Scientia Agricultura Sinica

Figure/Table detail

Variation in Rice Yield Response to Fertilization in China: Meta-analysis

HAN TianFu, MA ChangBao, HUANG Jing, LIU KaiLou, XUE YanDong, LI DongChu, LIU LiSheng, ZHANG Lu, LIU ShuJun, ZHANG HuiMin

Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(11): 1918-1929. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.11.007

Fig. 5 Response ratio (RR₊₊) of rice yield in response to fertilization practices in different the soil available phosphorus, available potassium and slowly available potassium levels
AP: Soil available phosphorus; AK: Soil available potassium; SAK: Soil slowly available potassium. The same as below

Other figure/table from this article

Fig. 3 Response ratio (RR₊₊) of rice yield in response to fertilization practices in different crops, fertilizers, and soil textures
Fig. 4 Response ratio (RR₊₊) of rice yield in response to fertilization practices in different the soil pH, organic matter, and total nitrogen levels
SOM: Soil organic matter; STN: Soil total nitrogen. The same as below
Fig. 2 Response ratio (RR₊₊) of rice yield in response to fertilization practices in different regions, times, and cropping systems
Dots with error bars denote the overall mean response ratio and 95% CI, respectively. The 95% CI that do not go across the zero line mean significant difference between treatment and control. The values in parentheses represent independent sample size. The same as below
Table 1 Descriptive statistics for sample size
Fig. 1 The yield of rice under different treatments
CK means no fertilizer treatment, F means conventional fertilizer treatment. Different lowercases indicate significantly different (P＜0.05); The solid line in the box represents the median value, and dash line represents the average value. The upper and lower of the box represent 75% and 25% of total data, respectively. The upper and lower of the lines represent 95% and 5% of total data, respectively. The upper and lower of the solid points represent the vertical outliers. The values in parentheses represent the number of rice yield data of each treatment
Fig. 6 Variable importance
Fig. 7 Relationship between the response ratio (RR₊₊) of rice yield and fertilizer agricultural efficiency
CF: Chemical fertilizer; CMF: Chemical and organic fertilizer

About journal

About journal

Editorial board

Indexed-in

Browse

Accepted

Current Issue

Archive

Most Download

Most Read

Most Cited

Browse by Column

Special Issue

Virtual Issues

Author Center

Submission

Guidelines

Manuscript Writing

Copyright Agreement

Template

Charges

Subscription

Contact us

中文

模态框（Modal）标题

About journal

Browse

Author Center