Qiaohong Fan, Jingnan Zou, Zhimin Lin, Gui Chen, Wu You, Kai Su, Wenxiong Lin
Accepted: 2025-07-08
The rice ratooning (RR) pattern is increasingly gaining attention in southern China due to its low carbon emissions and high yield characteristics. However, the net carbon budget balance and the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Three rice planting patterns were established in this trial experiment conducted from 2021 to 2022 in Fuzhou (25°17′N, 119°18′E), Southeast China: the ratooning rice pattern (MC+RSR) for rice ratooning, single-cropping rice (LR1), and double-cropping rice (ER+LR2). The closed static dark box gas collection, dry matter determination, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) etc. approaches were utilized to investigate the mechanism of "high carbon fixation - low emissions" in the rice ratooning system. This was achieved through a comprehensive evaluation across multiple dimensions, including crop yield, GHG emissions, carbon and nitrogen footprints, resource utilization efficiency, carbon fixation capacity, and carbon budget balance. The results showed that the average daily yield of the ratooning season rice (RSR) across different RR patterns from 2021 to 2022 was 28.21 to 47.40% higher than that of the main crop (MC) and single-cropping rice (LR1), and 13.50 to 27.76% higher than that of the double cropping system. This discrepancy was attributed to a 3.32-6.85% increase in the allocation of 13C photosynthetic products (including NSC) to panicle organs and a 21.77-43.51% reduction in allocation to underground roots and soil of RSR. Moreover, the average daily GWP values are 16.44 kg CO2-eq ha⁻1 for ratoon rice (MC+RSR), 24.99 kg CO2-eq ha⁻1 for single-cropping rice (LR1), and 21.32 kg CO2-eq ha⁻1 for double-cropping rice (ER+LR2). Specifically, the average daily GWP of ratoon rice is 34.21% lower than that of single-cropping rice and 22.90% lower than that of double-cropping rice. Similarly, the average daily GHGI of ratoon rice is 62.28% lower than that of single-cropping rice and 28.96% lower than that of double-cropping rice. In terms of carbon and nitrogen footprints, the ratoon rice model exhibited average daily values of 34.54 kg CO2-eq ha-1 and 22.72 kg N-eq ha-1, respectively. In comparison, the single-cropping rice model had average daily values of 45.63 kg CO2-eq ha-1 and 24.49 kg N-eq ha-1, while the double-cropping rice model showed averages of 43.38 kg CO2-eq ha-1 and 24.77 kg N-eq ha-1, indicating the reductions of 24.30 and 7.23% in carbon and nitrogen footprints compared to the single-cropping rice model, as well as reductions of 20.38 and 8.30% relative to the double-cropping rice system. Furthermore, the average carbon budget surplus across the three cropping systems is as follows: 22,380.01 kg CO2-eq ha-1 for ratoon rice (MC+RSR), 11,228.54 kg CO2-eq ha-1 for single-cropping rice (LR1), and 23,772.15 kg CO2-eq ha-1 for double-cropping rice (ER+LR2). Therefore, the resource utilization efficiency of the ratoon rice model (MC+RSR) was 23.92 and 47.50% higher than that of the single-cropping rice model (LR1) and the double-cropping rice model (ER+LR2), respectively. Furthermore, the average daily economic benefits increased by 32.71 and 80.75%, respectively. These findings provide a robust theoretical foundation and practical guidance for advancing agricultural carbon neutrality technologies and ensuring food security.