Dili Lai, Yu Fan, Md. Nurul Huda, Yuanfen Gao, Tanzim Jahan, Wei Li, Yuqi He, Kaixuan Zhang, Jianping Cheng, Jingjun Ruan, Baoping Zhao, Meiliang Zhou
Accepted: 2024-11-05
The phenylpropane metabolic pathway is one of the most significant metabolic pathways in plants, synthesizing more than 8,000 metabolites, including flavonoids, lignans, lignin, coumarins, and other metabolites through multiple branching pathways (Gao et al. 2024, Zhang and Liu 2015). This pathway is crucial in plant growth, development, and plant-environment interactions (Dong and Lin 2021). The essential functions of flavonoids in UV protection (Gaberscik et al. 2002), disease resistance (He et al. 2023a), and salt tolerance (Ismail et al. 2015) highlight the significance of developing a rapid detection method for phenylpropane pathway compounds and their associated flavonoids, facilitating gene function validation, genetic breeding, and metabolic engineering for enhanced flavonoid production.
Currently, several liquid-phase methods, particularly LC-Q-TOF-MS/MS, are available to detect different bioactive compounds, especially flavonoids in the phenylpropane metabolic pathway. For example, it has been reported in kiwifruit (Wojdyło and Nowicka 2019), citrus (Xing et al. 2017), chili (Mi et al. 2020), grapes (Mayr et al. 2018), soybeans, and ginkgo biloba (Meng et al. 2022). While several liquid-phase methods exist for detecting phenylpropane pathway substances and flavonoids, prior studies have certain limitations, such as fewer detected compounds, lack of systematicity and comprehensiveness, low detection efficiency, and high cost. Therefore, developing a systematic and comprehensive method to detect flavonoid compounds from initiating the phenylpropane pathway to rutin becomes necessary.
Addressing this need, we have established a rapid method for detecting flavonoids, facilitating a deeper understanding of the dynamics and gene functions within the phenylpropane metabolic pathway. Briefly, the freeze-dried material was pulverized into a dry powder, sieved through an 80 mesh sieve, and precisely weighed 0.1 g. Subsequently, 10 mL of 80 % (v/v) methanol/water solution was added, followed by vortexing and shaking for 1 min. The extraction process was performed using an ultrasonic bath at 80 kHz for 40 min at a constant temperature of 50°C. Finally, the extracts underwent filtration through a 0.22 µm organofiltration membrane, followed by identification and quantification of compounds using LC-QqQ-MS/MS (Agilent 1290-6495). An analytical system comprising an Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC) Agilent 1290 Infinity coupled with an Agilent 1290 Infinity G4226A autosampler, in conjunction with an accurate-mass Quadrupole-Time of Flight (Q/TOF) Mass Spectrometer Agilent 6495 (nominal resolution 40000) equipped with an Agilent Dual Jet Stream Ionization source (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used. Chromatographic separation was performed utilizing a Zorbax reverse-phase column (RRHD SB-C18 3×150 mm, 1.8 µm, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a solvent composition consisting of 0.1% (v/v) aqueous formic acid (solvent A) and 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile (solvent B). The elution gradient program entailed an initial 2% B isocratic hold for 2 mins, followed by a linear increase from 2 to 10% B over 2 mins, a subsequent gradient from 10 to 80% B over 7 mins, a further increase to 98% B over 2 mins, a return to 2% B over 2 mins, and concluding with a 2% B isocratic hold for 2 mins. The flow rate was set at 0.4 mL/min, with a sample injection volume of 2 µL and a column temperature of 40°C. Data acquisition was facilitated using Agilent MassHunter version B.04.00 (B4033.2) software. Data analysis was performed utilizing Agilent MassHunter Qualitative Analysis software version B.07.00. Compound identification relied on accurate mass and isotope pattern, with compound identification scores expressed as “overall identification score”, calculated as the weighted average of the isotopic pattern signal.
The flavonoid biosynthesis pathway has been well studied in model plant Arabidopsis and various crop species, including rice, maize, bean, and tomato (Tohge et al. 2017). Flavonoids are mainly synthesized through the phenylpropane biosynthesis pathway (Li et al. 2021). Therefore, this study constructs a detection method for flavonoids related to the phenylpropanoid metabolism pathway (Appendix A). In addition to the major flavonoids such as rutin, our assay encompasses a range of related compounds such as kaempferol, astragalin, nicotiflorin, afzelin, etc. (Appendices B and C). Furthermore, our method extends beyond flavonoids to include the detection of additional substance classes, including phenolic acids such as trans-cinnamic acid, 4-hydroxycinnamic acid, and chlorogenic acid, as well as quinones like emodin. Moreover, coumarins such as esculetin and scopoletin, proanthocyanidins like procyanidin A1/B1/C1, and anthocyanins such as keracyanin chloride and cyanidin chloride are also included (Fig. 1-A). Although some compounds have been previously reported (El-Najjar et al. 2011, Matos 2021), their integration into the flavonoid assay enhances the assay’s comprehensiveness. Thus, our method facilitates a more thorough assessment of flavonoid-related compounds, elucidating a more complete pathway from phenylpropane to rutin.
The validation of the assay in this study encompassed a comprehensive series of experiments, including linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), precision, stability, and repeatability (Appendix D). Notably, the established calibration curves for all analytes demonstrated good linear regression with high coefficients of determination (R2≥0.9935). The LOD and LOQ were higher for five substances, including chlorogenic acid, proanthocyanidins, procyanidin C1, ampelopsin, and trans-cinnamic acid, while for the remaining analytes, they were below 8.54 and 28.47 ng mL-1, respectively. Precision, stability, and repeatability tests demonstrated relative standard deviations below 4.85, 4.98, and 4.96%, respectively, collectively indicating the reliability of the method. In summary, our LC-MS/MS method demonstrates high sensitivity, precision, and accuracy, enabling simultaneous and rapid determination of the targeted 37 compounds.
We tested the method’s feasibility by taking a flavonoid-rich plant (buckwheat) as the research object. Tartary buckwheat is known for its diverse flavonoid content and various health-promoting attributes, including antioxidant properties, balanced amino acid composition, richness in resistant starch, and other functions (Joshi et al. 2020, Kreft et al. 2020, Huda et al. 2021). Utilizing this method to detect flavonoids in buckwheat is, therefore, crucial and can serve as validation of its applicability. Consequently, various tissues (roots, stems, leaves, flowers, and seeds) from three widely distributed buckwheat varieties (Tartary buckwheat, common buckwheat, and golden buckwheat) were utilized as samples for analysis (Fig. 1-B-D). Moreover, constituents within the golden buckwheat rhizome were also detected. The findings revealed that, overall, the flowers of all three buckwheat species exhibited the highest flavonoid content, encompassing compounds such as quercitrin, naringenin, afzelechin, rutin, nicotiflorin, afzelin, and others (Fig. 1-E-G). This observation aligns with existing literature indicating that buckwheat flowers are notably rich in flavonoids (Zhang et al. 2017, He et al. 2023b), thereby validating the effectiveness of the established methodology in accurately reflecting the sample's composition. Besides, catechin, epicatechin, procyanidin C1, procyanidin B1, and chlorogenic acid exhibit higher concentrations in leaves and flowers than in other tissues, consistent with previous findings (Hou et al. 2021). These findings demonstrate the potential of the method to analyze flavonoid-rich plants, such as buckwheat, while also affirming its ability to provide an objective reflection of sample composition.
The successful application of this method in buckwheat makes us consider whether this method can be extended to other model plants. Arabidopsis thaliana and tobacco were used to broaden its application. The findings showed a significant abundance of chlorogenic acid in tobacco leaves, constituting approximately 2% of the sample composition (Fig. 1-H-J), consistent with prior studies attributing chlorogenic acid as the most abundant polyphenol in tobacco (Wang et al. 2023, Zou et al. 2021), thereby affirming the reliability of our method to a certain extent. A large number of flavonoids were detected in both model plants, including rutin, nicotiflorin, afzelin, procyanidin, procyanidin C1, procyanidin B1, and ampelopsin. Additionally, several compounds were identified at lower levels in tobacco and Arabidopsis, such as kaempferol, isoquercitrin, quercitrin, apigenin, catechin, epicatechin, afzelechin, linarin, keracyanin chloride, 4-hydroxycinnamic acid, vitexin-glucoside, and kaempferol-3-glucuronide, with concentrations at approximately 4 µg g-1 or less. Besides, tobacco exhibited notably higher levels of quercitrin, epicatechin, and keracyanin compared to Arabidopsis. On the other hand, some substances were not detected in either tobacco or Arabidopsis, which potentially indicates that these substances are extremely rare in these model plants or that this method may be more suitable for application in flavonoid-rich plants. However, the majority of compounds (20) included in the method were detected in both Arabidopsis and tobacco, indicating that the method is effective for flavonoid detection across diverse plant species.
In summary, this study presents a comprehensive method for the rapid detection and evaluation of flavonoids along the phenylpropane pathway in plants, encompassing 37 substances ranging from phenylpropanes to rutin and its derivatives, including phenolic acids (4), flavonoids (21), anthocyanins (4), coumarins (3), proanthocyanidins (4), and quinones (1). The method's effectiveness was successfully validated in flavonoid-rich buckwheat plants, yielding positive results. In addition, the application of the method was extended to Arabidopsis and tobacco leaves. Our method has several main advantages: focused on the phenylpropane pathway, abundant detection substances, short time consuming, lower cost, and accurate quantification. This method provides valuable support for assessing flavonoid contents in the phenylpropanoid metabolic pathway of plants, facilitating gene function validation and advancing crop genetic improvement.