
Effect of Several Biological Agents on Controlling Rice Blast and Improving Yield and Quality of Organic Rice
YAN Yu, WANG Weijian, YAO Yutian, CHEN Chen, QIU Jun, ZHANG Xiaowei, CHEN Xijun
Effect of Several Biological Agents on Controlling Rice Blast and Improving Yield and Quality of Organic Rice
Rice blast is one of the most serious diseases in organic rice production. To clarify the effect of several biological agents on controlling rice blast and improving yield and quality of organic rice, the disease severity, defense enzyme activities, and yield and quality indexes were detected after seed treatment and foliage spraying using the biological agents. Results showed that the biological agents used for seed soaking combined with foliage spraying had high control effects on rice blast, and the control effect of Bacillus subtilis, shenqinmycin and kasugamycin on leaf-blast was 62.84%, 58.11% and 54.05% respectively, and the disease index control efficacy was 81.07%, 56.49% and 46.11% respectively, the control effect on panicle-blast was relatively poor, 63.63%, 54.62% and 54.05% respectively, and the disease index control efficacy was 48.92%, 34.23% and 29.85%, respectively. After treatment with biological agents, the activities of defensive enzymes in rice plants were significantly increased, and most of them reached the maximum within 1-7 days. Yield-related indexes such as grain number per panicle, seed setting rate and 1000-grain weight increased significantly while the rate of brown rice, milled rice and head milled rice increased slightly. The content of amylose and protein increased slightly while the rate of chalky and green rice decreased significantly. The results indicated that application of biological agents could effectively control rice blast and improve the yield and quality of organic rice.
yield / quality / control effect / rice blast / organic rice {{custom_keyword}} /
[1] |
杜延军, 朱思齐. 我国水稻播种面积影响因素的实证研究[J]. 粮食科技与经济, 2018, 43(1):29-32,97.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[2] |
王艳青. 近年来中国水稻病虫害发和及趋势分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(2):343-347.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[3] |
孙国昌, 杜新法, 陶荣祥, 等. 水稻稻瘟病防治策略和21世纪研究展望[J]. 植物病理学报, 1998, 28(4):289-292.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[4] |
中国农药信息网. 农药登记数据[DB/OL]. http://www.chinapesticide.org.cn/hysj/index.jhtml.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[5] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[6] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[7] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[8] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[9] |
国家认证认可监督管理委员会, 中国农业大学. 中国有机产品认证与有机产业发展-2020[M]. 中国质检出版社北京,2020.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[10] |
孟凡乔. 中国有机农业发展:贡献与启示[J]. 中国生态农业学报:中英文, 2019, 27(2):198-205.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[11] |
金连登. 我国有机稻米生产现状及发展对策研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2007(3):1-4.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[12] |
孔凡明, 许志刚. 水稻不育系抗白枯病与体内酶活性变化的关系[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 1998, 25(3):217-223.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[13] |
李靖, 利容千, 袁文静. 黄瓜感染霜霉病菌叶片中一些酶活性的变化[J]. 植物病理学报, 1991, 21(4):277-283.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[14] |
邹琦. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社,2000.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[15] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[16] |
国家统计局. 国家数据[DB/OL]. https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01&zb=A0D0C&sj=2020.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[17] |
全国农业技术推广服务中心. 2017年全国农业有害生物抗药性监测结果及科学用药建议[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2017, 38(4):52-56.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[18] |
吴进才. 农药诱导害虫再猖獗机制[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2011, 48(4):799-803.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[19] |
徐雄, 李春梅, 孙静, 等. 我国重点流域地表水中29种农药污染及其生态风险评价[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2016, 11(2):347-354.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[20] |
This article investigates the sources of vegetables consumed by farmers, their perception of pesticide-related food safety risks and the behaviors they engage in to protect themselves, and explores the implications for the social co-governance (<em>shehui gongzhi</em>) of food safety emphasized by China’s recent Food Safety Law. The research site is a county in Yunnan Province where vegetable growing is the major source of income and livelihood for local farmers. We surveyed 417 farmers and collected 776 vegetable samples from 377 surveyed farmer households and tested them for organophosphate and carbamate pesticide residues using PR-12N Rapid Detection Instrument for Pesticide Residues. The results showed that farmers know about the risks to food safety caused by pesticides used in vegetable growing and they purposely avoid these risks by mainly consuming vegetables planted in home gardens or private plots that use little or no pesticides. Vegetable samples from these private plots had the lowest positive rate of pesticide residues (6.10%), compared with vegetable samples from commercial farmland (13.73%) and markets (12.66%), and the difference was statistically significant (<em>X</em><sup>2</sup>=9.69,0.005<<em>P</em><0.010). This implies that the efforts of farmers to protect themselves from pesticide-related food safety risks do have some effect; however, the effect is limited due to the environmental pollution caused by the massive use of pesticides in commercial vegetable growing. Furthermore, this self-protective behavior may have a negative impact on the social co-governance of food safety set out in the new Food Safety Law.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[21] |
刘晓漫, 曹坳程, 王秋霞, 等. 我国生物农药的登记及推广应用现状[J]. 植物保护, 2018, 44(5):101-107.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[22] |
成晓松, 张俊喜. 申嗪霉素与王铜混用对水稻穗期病害防治技术研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(5):190-192.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[23] |
穆常青, 潘玮, 陆庆光, 等. 枯草芽孢杆菌对稻瘟病的防治效果评价及机制初探[J]. 中国生物防治, 2006, 22(2):158-160.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[24] |
罗剑英. 申嗪霉素对水稻白叶枯病菌(Xanthomonas oryzae pv.oryzae)作用机制初步研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学,2014.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[25] |
刘永锋, 李美荣, 陈志谊, 等. YD4-6和NV11-4菌株抑菌活性及诱导水稻防御酶活性变化[J]. 微生物学通报, 2020, 37(12):1753-1759.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[26] |
朱凤, 田子华, 邰德良, 等. 从2014年稻瘟病重发谈今后防控对策的改进[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(8):155-158.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[27] |
龙俊江, 宋锦, 赵世浩. 入田280FS种子处理悬浮剂对水稻稻瘟病的防治效果试验[J]. 南方农业, 2019, 13(17):19-21.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[28] |
梁梦琦, 刘连盟, 孙磊, 等. 生产上主要杀菌剂对稻瘟病菌的防效及施药时期研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2017, 23(6):93-96.
稻瘟病是最主要的世界性水稻病害,化学防治是目前最为有效的防控措施。通过室内生测和田间试验相结合的方法,测试了多个特效药剂和广谱药剂对稻瘟病的防治效果,探讨了稻瘟病的最优防治适期和穗颈瘟、稻曲病兼防的可能性。结果表明,三环唑仍然是预防穗颈瘟的特效杀菌剂,而嘧菌酯、肟菌酯·戊唑醇和嘧菌酯·苯醚甲环唑等广谱杀菌剂对叶瘟表现出更好的防控效果。始穗期是防治穗颈瘟的关键时期,在发病严重的情况下在齐穗期再施1次药是必要的。如果选用合适的药剂,破口前施药对穗颈瘟也有一定的防控作用。由于防治稻曲病的最佳施药时期是破口前,因此,一次施药兼防穗颈瘟和稻曲病是可行的。
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[29] |
谢子正, 许渭根, 李仁忠, 等. 2014年浙江省水稻稻瘟病流行特点及原因分析[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2015, 35(3):58-60.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[30] |
马德学, 刘凤艳. 井灌稻作区秸秆还田对稻瘟病发生影响的研究[J]. 现代化农业, 2013,(5):4-6.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[31] |
张加云, 谢国清, 韩忠良. 2008年云南省水稻稻瘟病发生条件分析[J]. 云南农业科技, 2009,(1):50-51.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[32] |
朱洁, 李仲惺, 潘育东. 异噻菌胺·肟菌酯、肟菌酯·戊唑醇组合用药对稻瘟病的防治效果[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2016, 57(8):1258-1260.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
{{custom_ref.label}} |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
Collection(s)
/
〈 |
|
〉 |