Environmental Risk Assessment and Spatial-temporal Features of Fertilizer Utilization in Zhejiang

WANG Yulei, SHAN Yingjie, QIN Yebo

PDF(1284 KB)
PDF(1284 KB)
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2022, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3) : 30-34. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20200100004

Environmental Risk Assessment and Spatial-temporal Features of Fertilizer Utilization in Zhejiang

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Based on the fertilization intensity, environmental safety threshold and fertilization efficiency, a model of environmental risk assessment was adopted to analyze the spatial-temporal features of chemical fertilization in Zhejiang Province from 1978 to 2017. The results showed that the total amount and the intensity of fertilizer used in cultivated land of Zhejiang increased and then decreased from 1978 to 2017, and obvious differences existed in different areas. In 2017, total environmental risk index due to fertilizer use was 0.69, which was at a medium risk level. The environmental risk index of potassium fertilizer application was at low level, and that of nitrogen and phosphate fertilizer application was at medium level. The environmental risk index of fertilizer application in Huzhou and Zhoushan was at a safe level, and that of other regions of Zhejiang Province was at medium level. The nitrogen fertilizer application of 2 cities and potassium fertilizer application of 3 cities were at severe risk level. It is suggested that scientific fertilization technologies should be studied to reduce environmental risks and increase fertilizer use efficiency.

Key words

fertilizer application / safety threshold / fertilization intensity / spatial-temporal distribution / risk index / Zhejiang Province

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Yulei , SHAN Yingjie , QIN Yebo. Environmental Risk Assessment and Spatial-temporal Features of Fertilizer Utilization in Zhejiang. Journal of Agriculture. 2022, 12(3): 30-34 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20200100004

References

[1]
熊昭昭, 王书月, 童雨, 等. 江西省农业面源污染时空特征及污染风险分析[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(12):2821-2828.
[2]
王磊, 香宝, 苏本营, 等. 京津冀地区农业面源污染风险时空差异研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2017, 36(7):1254-1265.
[3]
姜滢, 尤悦文, 徐杨, 等. 2005—2014年苏州市农业面源污染源强变化特征[J]. 热带作物学报, 2016, 37(9):1805-1811.
[4]
姜茜, 孙炜琳. 浙江省农业面源污染风险分析及防治对策[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(9):311-315.
[5]
农业部种植业管理司. 农业部关于印发《到2020 年化肥使用量零增长行动方案》和《到2020 年农药使用量零增长行动方案》的通知[EB/OL]. 中华人民共和国农业部. [2015-03-18]. http://jiuban.moa.gov.cn/zwllm/tzgg/tz/201503/t201503184444765.htm
[6]
刘钦普. 江苏省农田化肥使用环境风险评价及影响因素[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2014, 42(8):310-312.
[7]
薛超, 田若蘅, 雷永疆, 等. 贵州省化肥施用时空分异及环境风险评价[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2018, 29(18):1-4.
[8]
刘钦普, 林振山, 周亮. 山东省化肥使用时空分异及潜在环境风险评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(7):208-214.
[9]
田若蘅, 黄成毅, 邓良基 等. 四川省化肥面源污染环境风险评估及趋势模拟[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(11):1739-1751.
[10]
环境保护部. 关于印发《国家生态文明建设示范村镇指标(试行)》的通知[EB/OL]. [2014-01-17]. http://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bwj/201401/t20140126_266962.htm
[11]
刘钦普. 中国化肥投入区域差异及环境风险分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(18):3596-3605.
[12]
吴良泉, 武良, 崔振岭. 中国水稻区域氮磷钾肥推荐用量及肥料配方研究[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2016, 21(9):01-13.
[13]
李书田, 金继运. 中国不同区域农田养分输入、输出与平衡[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(20):4207-4229.
[14]
张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 等. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径[J]. 土壤学报, 2017, 45(5):915-924.
[15]
浙江省农业农村厅浙江省财政厅关于试行农业投入化肥定额制的意见[EB/OL].[[2019-08-07]. http://www.zjagri.gov.cn/art/2019/8/7/art_1589297_36435903.html
[16]
陆若辉, 陈思力, 沈月. 降低浙江农田化肥施肥强度对策分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2017, 58(8):1293-1295,1301.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright reserved © 2022. Chinese Agricultural Association. All articles published represent the opinions of the authors, and do not reflect the official policy of the Chinese Agricultural Association or the Editorial Board, unless this is clearly specified.
Share on Mendeley
PDF(1284 KB)

Collection(s)

Cotton

Horticulture

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/