Light Response Model of Three Camellia oleifera F1 Generation

PDF(1254 KB)
PDF(1254 KB)
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2018, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (10) : 47-51. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas18060016

Light Response Model of Three Camellia oleifera F1 Generation

Author information +
History +

Abstract

To provide a basis for the breeding of hybrid Camellia oleifera, we selected suitable one from four light response models by fitting and comparing the light response curve of 3 hybrid F1 generation of Camellia oleifera. It showed that there was a similar change of Pn in the 3 hybrid F1 generation by using the light response curve fitting, but the maximum value was different, the order was‘Ganwu 16’(♂)בShuntaifenhong’ (♀) hybrid[7.61 μmol/(m2·s)]>‘Gan190’(♂)בGanwu 8’(♀) hybrid[8.74 μmol/(m2·s)]>‘Ganwu 1’(♂)× ‘Baipizhongzi’(♀) hybrid[2.62 μmol/(m2·s)]. The light suppression point of the hybrid progeny of‘Ganwu 16’ (♂)ב Shuntaifenhong’(♀) [1750 μmol/(m2·s)] and‘Gan190’(♂)בGanwu 8’(♀) hybrid [1600 μmol/(m2·s)] were higher than that of‘Ganwu 1’(♂)בBaipizhongzi’(♀) hybrid [1000 μmol/(m2·s)]. Under the weak light condition [<200 μmol/(m2 ·s)], the curves of the four light response models were almost straight. The fitting values of the 3 hybrids light saturation points and the compensation points were close to the measured values by using the right angle hyperbolic correction model. The path analysis showed that the main factors affecting the 3 hybrids Pn were different. The main affecting factors of Pn of‘Ganwu 16’(♂)בShuntaifenhong’(♀) hybrid and‘Gan190’(♂)בGanwu 8’(♀) hybrid were Ci and Tr, and the direct effect of Ci on Pn was - 0.980, -0.840, the effect of Tr on Pn was achieved by the direct effect of Tr on Pn (0.749, 0.189) and the indirect effect of Tr on Pn through Gs (0.241, 0.183). The main affecting factors on Pn of‘Ganwu 16’(♂)× ‘Shuntaifenhong’(♀) hybrid were Ci and Gs, the path coefficient of the direct effect of Ci on Pn was -0.667, the effect of Gs on Pn was achieved by the direct effect of Gs on Pn (0.510) and the indirect effect of Gs on Pn through Tr (0.503).

Key words

camellia;oleifera F1 Hybrid, Light;Response Model

Cite this article

Download Citations
Light Response Model of Three Camellia oleifera F1 Generation. Journal of Agriculture. 2018, 8(10): 47-51 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas18060016

References

[1]吴方圆,李泽,刘繁灯,等.油茶主栽品种光合特性的比较[J].经济林研究,2018, 36(02):7-13
[2]施金玉,王健,秦宇.1年生油茶嫁接苗的生长规律[J].贵州农业科学,2017, 45(11):43-47.
[3]孙颖,孙海林,幸伟年.油茶产业SWOT分析与发展策略研究[J].农学学报,2017, 7(08):93-96+108.
[4]孙颖,孙海林,李江,等.Co~(60)γ诱变处理油茶的光合特性研究[J].南方林业科学,2017,45(04):1-3+15.
[5]谌丽施,秦爱文,孙颖,龚春,徐林初.太空诱变油茶M_1代光合特性的研究[J].南方林业科学,2015,43(03):11-14.
[6]何志祥,孙颖,雷小林,等.油茶简化修剪光合特性研究[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(16):111-116.
[7]李建安,何志祥,孙颖,等.油茶林分光合特性的研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2010,30(10):56-61.
[8]孙赫,赵春梅,代忠迪,等.光合-光响应模型的研究进展[J].林业科技情报, 2016,48(04):15-18.
[9]柴胜丰,唐健民,杨雪,等.4种模型对黄枝油杉光合光响应曲线的拟合分析[J].广西科学院学报,2015,31(04):286-291.
[10]宋佩东.5种光响应模型对小叶杨的适用性分析[J].辽宁林业科技,2015, (03):9-12.
[11]钟楚,朱勇.几种光合作用光响应模型对烟草的适用性分析[J].中国农业气象, 2013,34(01):74-80.
[12]叶子飘,王建林.植物光合-光响应模型的比较分析[J].井冈山学院学报,2009, 30(02):9-13.
[13]王秀伟,毛子军.7个光响应曲线模型对不同植物种的实用性[J].植物研究,2009, 29(01):43-48.
[14]叶子飘,于强.光合作用光响应模型的比较[J].植物生态学报,2008,(06):1356-1361.
[15]佘诚棋,程鹏,季琳琳,等.油茶光合作用光响应曲线的拟合[J].经济林研究,2012,30(01):118-120+137.
[16]何应会,马锦林,张日清,等..3个油茶优良无性系光合特性研究[J].广西林业科学,2009,38(04):212-217.
[17]林玮,黄永芳,黄永韬.不同油茶无性系光响应的研究[J].广东林业科技[J].2013, 29(02):23-27.
[18]谌丽施. 诱变普通油茶M1代生长与光合特性研究[D].江西农业大学,2015.
[19]叶子飘,胡文海,闫小红,等.基于光响应机理模型的不同植物光合特性[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(09):2544-2552.
[20]孔文娟,刘学录,姚小华,等.4个油茶物种的光合特性研究[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,35(01):16-22.
[21]曹永庆,姚小华,滕建华,等.花粉直感效应对油茶种实特征的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,40(05):55-60.
Share on Mendeley
PDF(1254 KB)

51

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/