PDF(2046 KB)
Analysis of Characteristics of Research Papers on Nitrogen Utilization in Crop Intercropping Cultivation in China from 2000 to 2022
DONGKuijun, ZHANGYitao, XIBin, LIUHanwen
PDF(2046 KB)
PDF(2046 KB)
Analysis of Characteristics of Research Papers on Nitrogen Utilization in Crop Intercropping Cultivation in China from 2000 to 2022
Clarifying the differences in the characteristics of Chinese and English articles on farmland intercropping can better provide theoretical support and reference for carrying out researches in the field, condensing results and publishing high-level articles under the new situation. In this study, CiteSpace software was used to conduct a bibliometric analysis of keyword co-occurrence and keyword burst to analyze the characteristics of Chinese and English literatures in the field of nitrogen utilization in intercropping system in 2000-2022, using the literatures related to nitrogen utilization in intercropping system in Web of Science (WOS) core database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) as the research objects. It was found that the Chinese and English publications of nitrogen research in intercropping system have been quite different. In the first decade, Chinese publications were mainly focused on the economic and environmental benefits of nitrogen regulation in intercropping system under different external conditions. However, in recent years, the number of English publications has far exceeded the number of Chinese publications, and many highly cited articles have been published in journals with great international influence. The journals with the largest number of articles in Chinese were mainly domestic well-known journals such as Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, Acta Agronomica Sinica and Scientia Agricultura Sinica. The journals with the largest number of articles in English were mainly foreign mainstream journals such as Plant and Soil and Field Crops Research, and the impact factors were all above 3.5 points. The institutions with the most Chinese publications were mainly Yunnan Agricultural University and Sichuan Agricultural University. From the perspective of the number of English publications, China Agricultural University and the Chinese Academy of Sciences were the main contributors. Compared with the keywords published in Chinese and English journals, the research content has certain similarities, mainly focusing on yield, maize, wheat, soil, nitrogen and nitrogen utilization efficiency. However, in recent years, there have been some differences in research hotspots. The published English articles focused on microorganisms and nitrogen research at a large scale, while the published Chinese articles still focused on increasing production and efficiency, focusing on economic benefits while taking into account environmental benefits. On the basis of theoretical research, they paid more attention to the application of technology, which can be replicated and more operable. Although the number of articles published and the level of research in this field have increased rapidly in China, the number of Chinese articles has been relatively reduced, and there is a lack of influential English mainstream journals in China. In the future, we should pay more attention to the combination of theory and practice, establish professional Chinese journals or set up special sections, open up the boundary between Chinese and English articles, and serve the production practice. At the same time, diversified intercropping planting and its microbial and genetic research should be carried out, and the research and development and application of supporting agricultural machinery and equipment should be promoted to promote farmland biodiversity, ecological effects and agricultural sustainable development potential.
intercropping system / nitrogen / CNKI / Web of Science / CiteSpace {{custom_keyword}} /
| [1] |
冯晨, 黄波, 冯良山, 等. 不同配置对辽西玉米‖花生间作系统氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(1):61-73.
【目的】通过研究不同配置条件下玉米‖花生间作系统地上部氮含量和吸收量,结合间作系统花生结瘤固氮和土壤有效氮分布,明确不同配置下玉米‖花生间作体系对氮素的吸收利用特征,为玉米‖花生间作氮高效利用模式的区域筛选提供依据。【方法】本试验于2015—2016年在国家农业环境阜新观测实验站进行,设置玉米单作（M）、花生单作（P）、2行玉米4行花生间作（M2P4）和4行玉米4行花生间作（M4P4）模式,玉米单作及每种间作模式下设3种不同玉米种植密度（6、9和12株/m<sup>2</sup>）,共10个处理,分析不同配置（行比和密度）玉米‖花生间作系统氮素吸收利用特征和优势。【结果】与单作相比,间作玉米和花生植株氮浓度变化并不明显,受作物占地比例影响,间作模式下玉米和花生的产量、氮产量均低于相应单作,且氮产量与间作生物产量表现相一致。玉米‖花生间作可以显著提高系统氮的吸收利用（氮吸收当量比NER>1）,且主要归因于玉米的养分吸收优势（pNER<sub>m</sub>为0.63—0.80）。随着玉米行比和密度的增加NER也随之增大,其中M4P4模式（NER 1.06—1.22）的氮吸收要显著高于M2P4模式（NER 1.0—1.06）。在玉米‖花生间作系统中,玉米比花生更有竞争力（A<sub>mp</sub>>0）,且竞争吸收氮养分能力也更强（CR<sub>mp</sub>>1）,M4P4行比以及玉米增密有助于增强玉米对氮营养的竞争,增加系统氮养分吸收优势（△NU>0）以及间作养分对产量的贡献（C）。与玉米间作可促进花生结瘤固氮,M4P4行比配置下花生根瘤数量、单株根瘤重量和单个瘤重均高于M2P4配置,且以中、低密度处理为优。间作系统中土壤有效氮含量（N<sub>min</sub>）表现为花生条带土壤N<sub>min</sub>高于玉米条带,且单作花生土壤N<sub>min</sub>高于间作花生,而单作玉米土壤N<sub>min</sub>低于间作玉米。【结论】玉米‖花生间作可显著提高系统氮的吸收利用,其中玉米对系统氮吸收的贡献较大,适度增加玉米行比和密度有助于增加系统氮素吸收当量比、增强玉米对氮营养的竞争以及间作养分对产量的贡献。综合分析认为,本研究中M4P4-6和M4P4-8为玉米‖花生间作较佳配置,玉米花生种间互作对间作系统干物质量和花生生物固氮的促进,以及玉米在吸收氮养分上的强竞争能力是玉米‖花生间作具有氮素吸收利用优势的重要原因。
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [2] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [3] |
Crop diversification has been put forward as a way to reduce the environmental impact of agriculture without penalizing its productivity. In this context, intercropping, the planned combination of two or more crop species in one field, is a promising practice. On an average, intercropping saves land compared with the component sole crops, but it remains unclear whether intercropping produces a higher yield than the most productive single crop per unit area, i.e., whether intercropping achieves transgressive overyielding. Here, we quantified the performance of intercropping for the production of grain, calories, and protein in a global meta-analysis of several production indices. The results show that intercrops outperform sole crops when the objective is to achieve a diversity of crop products on a given land area. However, when intercropping is evaluated for its ability to produce raw products without concern for diversity, intercrops on average generate a small loss in grain or calorie yield compared with the most productive sole crop (-4%) but achieve similar or higher protein yield, especially with maize/legume combinations grown at moderate N supply. Overall, although intercropping does not achieve transgressive overyielding on average, our results show that intercropping performs well in producing a diverse set of crop products and performs almost similar to the most productive component sole crop to produce raw products, while improving crop resilience, enhancing ecosystem services, and improving nutrient use efficiency. Our study, therefore, confirms the great interest of intercropping for the development of a more sustainable agricultural production, supporting diversified diets.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [4] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [5] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [6] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [7] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [8] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [9] |
曾昭海. 豆科作物与禾本科作物轮作研究进展及前景[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(1):57-61.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [10] |
杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 等. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6):1476-1487.
为明确玉米大豆套作、玉米花生间作养分吸收利用对产量优势贡献的差异。本研究开展了2年大田试验, 通过比较间套作与相应单作成熟期植株氮磷钾养分吸收量和利用效率, 综合分析了玉米大豆套作、玉米花生间作中养分吸收和利用效率的变化。结果表明: 玉米大豆套作土地当量比(land equivalent ratio, LER)为1.16~1.72, 具有套作产量优势, 玉米花生间作LER为0.89~1.13, 无明显间作产量优势。玉米大豆套作体系中, 植株氮、磷、钾养分吸收总量比相应单作提高32.60%~54.22%、27.35%~34.64%和17.74%~24.42%, 氮素利用效率低于相应单作21.99%~42.07%。氮、磷、钾吸收效率对LER的贡献分别为0.34~0.62、0.31~0.46和0.22~0.32, 利用效率的贡献分别为-0.11~ -0.35、-0.03~ -0.31和-0.11~0.22。玉米花生间作体系中, 氮、磷、钾养分吸收总量分别高出相应单作-7.86%~31.58%、23.09%~46.52%和1.60%~55.48%, 氮素利用效率高出相应单作7.55~26.60。氮、磷、钾吸收效率对LER的贡献分别为0~0.22、0.05~0.27和-0.11~0.32, 利用效率的贡献分别为-0.25~0.19、-0.32~0.11和-0.47~0.32。因此, 玉米大豆套作优势在营养方面的基础主要来自于相对于单作养分吸收总量的增加, 而玉米花生间作无明显间作优势主要因为养分吸收对产量优势的贡献较小。
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [11] |
李隆. 间套作强化农田生态系统服务功能的研究进展与应用展望[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(4):403-415.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [12] |
李隆, 李晓林, 张福锁, 等. 小麦大豆间作条件下作物养分吸收利用对间作优势的贡献[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2000, 6(2):140-146.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [13] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [14] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [15] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [16] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [17] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [18] |
李杰, 陈超美. CiteSpace科技文本挖掘及可视化[M]. 北京: 首都经济贸易大学出版社,2017:77-87.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [19] |
邱均平. 文献计量学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社,2019:1-13.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [20] |
梁丽娜, 赵亚慧, 吴佳俊, 等. 基于CiteSpace的国内外农业面源污染研究进展与前沿分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2023, 44(4):99-112.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [21] |
刘波, 李学斌, 何高吉, 等. 基于Web of Science数据库的土壤呼吸知识图谱分析[J]. 土壤通报, 2021(2):443-453.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [22] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [23] |
李洋, 温亮明. 我国科学数据外流:表现、问题与对策[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2019, 38(12):72-81.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [24] |
肖焱波, 李隆, 张福锁. 小麦/蚕豆间作体系中的种间相互作用及氮转移研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2005(5):965-973.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [25] |
安庆蓉, 赵西宁, 赵连豪, 等. 黄土高原间作大豆对幼龄果园土壤水分及氮素累积的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023, 37(5):152-159.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [26] |
王建鹏, 蔡明, 胡永琪, 等. 应用15N示踪法研究马铃薯燕麦间作对氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2023, 58(5):71-77.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [27] |
张亦涛, 任天志, 刘宏斌, 等. 玉米大豆间作降低小麦玉米轮作体系土壤氮残留的效应与机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(13):2580-2590.
【目的】阐明夏播玉米大豆间作对小麦玉米轮作体系产量、吸氮量、土壤含水量和硝态氮残留的影响，明确间作地上部和地下部因素对间作优势的相对贡献率，为优化资源配置、提高土地生产力提供科学依据。【方法】2011年6月至2012年10月，在河北省徐水县代表性农田设置玉米单作（T1）、大豆单作（T2）、玉米与大豆间作根部不分隔（T3）、玉米与大豆间作根部分隔（T4）4个处理，并对关键生育时期的作物生长、土壤水分和硝态氮含量进行实时观测。【结果】相对作物单作种植模式，间作产量优势明显，玉米大豆间作种植的土地当量比（LER）大于1，间作模式总吸氮量（256.1 kg·hm<sup>-2</sup>）显著高于玉米单作种植（159.7 kg·hm<sup>-2</sup>）。玉米大豆间作主要通过促进玉米生长和氮素吸收来提高间作系统生产能力，其中地上部因素对间作玉米生物量、产量和吸氮量提高的贡献率分别为81.6%、83.4%和75.7%，而地下部因素的贡献率仅为18.4%、16.6%和24.3%。间作玉米条带土壤含水量显著低于单作玉米，隔根间作玉米土壤含水量显著低于不隔根间作玉米，单作大豆与间作大豆土壤含水量无显著差异，隔根对间作大豆土壤含水量无显著影响。相对单作种植，间作系统降低了玉米收获后各层土壤硝态氮含量，而提高了大豆条带土壤硝态氮含量；相对不隔根处理，间作隔根对玉米土壤硝态氮含量影响不大，但降低了间作大豆土壤硝态氮含量。夏季无论是单作种植还是间作种植，其后茬小麦产量和吸氮量均无显著差异，但间作可以显著降低小麦收获后土壤硝态氮残留量（P＜0.05），相对玉米单作，间作种植的后茬小麦收获后0—100 cm土层硝态氮残留量降低了87.2 kg·hm<sup>-2</sup>，其中地上部因素贡献率为77.5%，地下部因素对此贡献仅为22.5%。【结论】夏播间作种植产量优势明显，间作模式整体吸氮量高于玉米单作，其中地上部因素对间作优势的贡献大于地下部因素，并且夏播间作种植对后茬小麦产量和吸氮量均无显著影响。相对单作种植，间作种植降低了玉米条带土壤含水量而对大豆条带无显著影响，间作玉米条带土壤硝态氮含量显著降低而大豆条带土壤硝态氮含量显著提高，但间作系统当季及后茬作物收获后的整体土壤硝态氮残留显著降低。
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [28] |
雍太文, 刘小明, 刘文钰, 等. 减量施氮对玉米-大豆套作体系中作物产量及养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(2):474-482.
通过田间试验研究了种植方式（玉米单作、大豆单作、玉米-大豆套作）和施氮水平（0、180、240 N kg·hm<sup>-2</sup>）对玉米和大豆产量、养分吸收及氮肥利用的影响.结果表明： 与单作相比，玉米-大豆套作体系中玉米籽粒产量、地上部植株N、P、K吸收量及收获指数略有降低，而大豆籽粒产量、地上部植株N、P、K吸收量及收获指数显著提高.玉米-大豆套作系统的套作优势随施氮量的增加而降低，与当地农民常规施氮量(240 kg·hm<sup>-2</sup>)相比，减量施氮（180 kg·hm<sup>-2</sup>）处理下玉米和大豆产量、经济系数，以及N、P、K吸收量和收获指数、氮肥农学利用率、氮肥吸收利用率显著提高，土壤氮贡献率降低；与不施氮相比，减量施氮降低了玉米带土壤的全N、全P含量，提高了大豆带土壤的全N、全P、全K含量和玉米带土壤的全K含量.减量施氮水平下，玉米-大豆套作系统的周年籽粒总产量、地上部植株N、P、K总吸收量均高于玉米和大豆单作，土地当量比（LER）达2.28；玉米-大豆套作系统的氮肥吸收利用率比玉米单作高20.2%，比大豆单作低30.5%，土壤氮贡献率比玉米和大豆单作分别低20.0%和8.8%.玉米-大豆套作减量一体化施肥有利于提高系统周年作物产量和氮肥利用率.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [29] |
雍太文, 杨文钰, 向达兵, 等. 玉/豆套作模式下玉米播期与密度对大豆农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2009, 28(3):439-444.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [30] |
范虹, 殷文, 柴强. 间作优势的光合生理机制及其冠层微环境特征[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2022, 30(11):1750-1761.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [31] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [32] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [33] |
Intercropping, the simultaneous production of multiple crops on the same field, provides opportunities for the sustainable intensification of agriculture if it can provide a greater yield per unit land and fertilizer than sole crops. The worldwide absolute yield gain of intercropping as compared with sole crops has not been analysed. We therefore performed a global meta-analysis to quantify the effect of intercropping on the yield gain, exploring the effects of crop species combinations, temporal and spatial arrangements, and fertilizer input. We found that the absolute yield gains, compared with monocultures, were the greatest for mixtures of maize with short-grain cereals or legumes that had substantial temporal niche differentiation from maize, when grown with high nutrient inputs, and using multirow strips of each species. This approach, commonly practised in China, provided yield gains that were (in an absolute sense) about four times as large as those in another, low-input intercropping strategy, commonly practised outside China. The alternative intercropping strategy consisted of growing mixtures of short-stature crop species, often as full mixtures, with the same growing period and with low to moderate nutrient inputs. Both the low- and high-yield intercropping strategies saved 16-29% of the land and 19-36% of the fertilizer compared with monocultures grown under the same management as the intercrop. The two syndromes of production in intercropping uncovered by this meta-analysis show that intercropping offers opportunities for the sustainable intensification of both high- and low-input agriculture.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [34] |
叶优良, 包兴国, 宋建兰, 等. 长期施用不同肥料对小麦玉米间作产量、氮吸收利用和土壤硝态氮累积的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2004:113-119.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [35] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [36] |
唐艺玲, 管奥湄, 周贤玉, 等. 减量施氮与间作大豆对华南地区甜玉米连作农田N2O排放的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(12):1529-1535.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [37] |
何春霞, 孟平, 张劲松, 等. 基于稳定碳同位素技术的华北低丘山区核桃-小麦复合系统种间水分利用研究[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(7):2047-2055.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [38] |
吴瑕, 胡艺琛, 杨凤军, 等. 间作分蘖洋葱对番茄氮素吸收和根际土壤微生物多样性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(8):1478-1493.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [39] |
周泉, 王龙昌, 熊瑛, 等. 绿肥间作和秸秆覆盖对冬季油菜根际土壤有机碳及土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2016, 37(3):1114-1120.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [40] |
汪雪, 刘晓静, 王静, 等. 紫花苜蓿-燕麦连续间作下根系及土壤养分时空变化特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10):2683-2692.
本试验采用田间框栽土培法,以紫花苜蓿单作和燕麦单作为参照,对紫花苜蓿和燕麦连续间作下不同时空根系特征、土壤养分特性以及高产年份中根系变化与土壤养分内在联系进行分析。结果表明: 与单作相比,间作降低了燕麦0～10 cm土层内的根重和总根长占比,显著提高了燕麦在20～30 cm土层内的根重和根表面积,显著增加了紫花苜蓿在10～20 cm土层内的根长和根长密度,并大幅度提高了间作系统中0～40 cm土层内的有效磷和有机质含量。随着种植年限的增长,间作下紫花苜蓿总根长、根重、根表面积及其在0～20 cm土层内的根重和根长占比均逐渐增加,燕麦根重、总根长、根表面积和根平均直径明显提高,尤其是20～30 cm土层内燕麦的根重和根表面积,而各土层速效养分含量降低。因此,在紫花苜蓿与燕麦间作体系内,连续间作可促进紫花苜蓿10～20 cm土层内总根长显著增加,有效改善燕麦20～40 cm土层(尤其20～30 cm土层)内根重和根表面积;且随着种植年份的增长,间作使紫花苜蓿与燕麦根系对0～40 cm土层内速效养分的吸收和竞争加剧,从而降低了速效养分在土壤中的累积。
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [41] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [42] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [43] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [44] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [45] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [46] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [47] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [48] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [49] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [50] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| {{custom_ref.label}} |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
PDF(2046 KB)
Collection(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
