Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Belt Deployment Methods on Nutrient Distribution and Utilization Characteristics of Apple-Soybean Alley Cropping System

WAN Qian, WANG Ruoshui, XIAO Wan, LUO Chengwei, DOU Xiaoyu, WANG Lisha, XIONG Chang, WANG Xin, DAI Houshuai

PDF(2340 KB)
PDF(2340 KB)
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11) : 64-73. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0355

Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Belt Deployment Methods on Nutrient Distribution and Utilization Characteristics of Apple-Soybean Alley Cropping System

Author information +
History +

Abstract

To investigate the effects of different drip irrigation belt deployment methods on soil and plant nutrient distribution and utilization characteristics in an alley cropping system, a split-zone experiment was carried out to analyze the spatial distribution of soil nutrients, soybean yield, plant nutrient uptake and use efficiency in a typical apple-soybean intercropping system under different drip irrigation belt deployment. Three types of drip belt spacing (L1: drip belt at the root of each soybean row; L2: one drip belt every other soybean row; L3: two drip belts every three soybean rows) and two types of mulching (M1: white film and M0: without film) were applied. The results showed that mulching type and drip irrigation belt layout had significant effects on the distribution of soil nutrients (P<0.05). In the horizontal direction, the variation trend of soil nutrient content in different distances from tree rows showed “V” and “N” shape patterns. By means of the drip belt layout, soil water and fertilizer could be redistributed, hence to promote the niche separation and alleviate competition between the two species as well, which could further improve the nutrient uptake and utilization efficiency to increase the yield ultimately. The highest plant nutrient content and uptake and utilization efficiency were both achieved in the treatment of white film mulching with one drip irrigation belt every other soybean row layout, under which the highest yield was 1747.6 kg/hm2. The model could provide reference for alleviating the interspecific water-fertilizer competition in apple-soybean intercropping system.

Key words

alley cropping system / drip irrigation belt deployment / interspecific competition / soil nutrients / Loess Plateau of west Shanxi Province

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations
WAN Qian , WANG Ruoshui , XIAO Wan , LUO Chengwei , DOU Xiaoyu , WANG Lisha , XIONG Chang , WANG Xin , DAI Houshuai. Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Belt Deployment Methods on Nutrient Distribution and Utilization Characteristics of Apple-Soybean Alley Cropping System. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2023, 39(11): 64-73 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0355

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within
[1]
云雷. 晋西黄土区果农间作系统种间关系研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2011:5-25.
本文引用 [2]
[2]
JOSE S, GILLESPIE A R, SEIFERT J R, et al. Defining competition vectors in a temperate alley cropping system in the midwestern USA: 3. Competition for nitrogen and litter decomposition dynamics[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2000, 48(1):61-77.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006241406462
http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1006241406462
本文引用 [2]
[3]
RAO M R, ONG C K, PATHAK P, et al. Productivity of annual cropping and agroforestry systems on a shallow Alfisol in semi-arid India[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 1991, 15(1):51-63.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046278
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00046278
本文引用 [2]
[4]
SANCHEZ P A. Science in agroforestry[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 1995, 30(1-2):5-55.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708912
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00708912
本文引用 [2]
[5]
FRIDAY J B, FOWNES J H. Competition for light between hedgerows and maize in an alley cropping system in Hawaii, USA[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2002, 55(2):125-137.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020598110484
http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1020598110484
本文引用 [2]
[6]
高飞, 王若水, 许华森. 晋西黄土区水肥调控对苹果玉米间作系统土壤含水量及分布的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2016, 14(4):94-104.
本文引用 [3]
[7]
JOSE S, GILLESPIE A R, PALLARDY S G. Interspecific interactions in temperate agroforestry[J]. Agroforsyst, 2004, 61(1):237-255.
本文引用 [1]
[8]
冯良山, 孙占祥, 郑家明, 等. 不同水肥条件对间作花生和谷子水分养分利用的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33(5):24-29.
本文引用 [1]
[9]
李发永, 张营山, 王龙, 等. 枣棉间作模式下作物不同水肥界面交互影响初探[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014, 32(2):99-106,136.
本文引用 [1]
[10]
尹飞, 毛任钊, 傅伯杰, 等. 枣粮间作生态系统土壤氮空间分布特性[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(1):325-331.
本文引用 [1]
[11]
秦树高, 吴斌, 张宇清, 等. 林草复合系统地下部分种间互作关系与化感作用研究进展[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(2):253-261.
本文引用 [1]
[12]
GOYAL S, CHANDER K, MUNDRA M C, et al. Influence of inorganic fertilizers and organic amendments on soil organic matter and soil microbial properties under tropical conditions[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1999, 29(2):196-200.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050544
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s003740050544
本文引用 [1]
[13]
张秀捷, 孔清华, 李光永, 等. 滴灌带间距和滴头间距对黄瓜产量的影响及经济效益分析[J]. 节水灌溉, 2010(9):81-83.
摘要
滴灌带的选择和布设方式是灌溉系统设计的重要参数，同时也决定了系统的投资效益。通过田间试验研究，分析了滴灌带间距和滴头间距对黄瓜产量和经济效益的影响。结果表明：在灌水条件相同的情况下，滴灌带间距和滴头间距耦合作用对黄瓜没有显著影响。但是从系统投资效益考虑，滴灌带间距为60cm，滴头间距为50cm时，系统投资效益最高。
[14]
王维娟, 牛文全, 孙艳琦, 等. 滴头间距对双点源交汇入渗影响的模拟研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 38(4):219-225,234.
本文引用 [1]
[15]
袁昌富, 李明思, 于英雷, 等. 滴头间距对线源滴灌土壤湿润均匀度的影响[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 28(4):492-496.
本文引用 [1]
[16]
李宝深. 滴灌蕉园养分综合管理技术研究与应用—以广西金穗为例[J]. 中国农业文摘-农业工程, 2016, 28(5):26.
本文引用 [1]
[17]
XINGFA H, ZHOUBI Z, ZEJUN H. Suitable Technological Parameters of Mulched Drip Irrigation of Corn in Northwest China Irrigation Frequency and Drip Line Spacing[J]. Agricultural Engineering, 2019.
本文引用 [2]
[18]
张文龙, 申磊, 王秀媛, 等. 焉耆盆地孜然与玉米间作种植对作物生产力及种间互作的影响[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2022:1-8.
本文引用 [1]
[19]
云雷, 毕华兴, 马雯静, 等. 晋西黄土区果农间作土壤养分空间分布[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010(26):292-299.
本文引用 [3]
[20]
许华森, 云雷, 毕华兴, 等. 核桃-大豆间作系统细根分布及地下竞争[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(7):1612-1616.
本文引用 [1]
[21]
侯云鹏, 孔丽丽, 尹彩侠, 等. 覆膜滴灌下氮肥与种植密度互作对东北春玉米产量、群体养分吸收与转运的调控效应[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(1):54-65.
本文引用 [2]
[22]
赵妍, 王凤新, 周奇, 等. 滴灌带间距和灌水定额对春小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(14):194-199.
https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15120040
本文引用 [1] 摘要
为了探究春小麦合适的滴灌灌水定额和滴灌带间距组合，2015年3—7月进行了春小麦大田试验，研究3种滴灌带间距(D1：60 cm、D2：90 cm、D3：120 cm)和3种灌水定额(I1：35 mm、I2：45 mm、I3：55 mm)对西北旱区春小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响。试验结果表明：产量最高的处理为D1I2达到8964 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>。当滴灌带间距为60 cm和90 cm时，灌水定额从35 mm增加至45 mm时产量显著增加，灌水定额达到55 mm时产量分别下降9.5%和2.2%。灌水定额为35 mm和45 mm时，滴灌带间距60 cm的处理产量显著高于滴灌带间距120 cm的处理；灌水定额增加到55 mm时，3个滴灌带间距处理产量无显著差异。水分利用效率在1.57~2.11 kg/m<sup>3</sup>间变化，最高的为D2I2处理。综合考虑产量、灌水量、水分利用效率和滴灌带投入，D2I2处理是该地区最优的滴灌带间距和灌水定额组合。
[23]
胡敏, 苗庆丰, 史海滨, 等. 不同地膜覆盖对春玉米生长发育及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(2):173-177.
本文引用 [2]
[24]
许华森, 毕华兴, 高路博, 等. 晋西黄土区果农间作系统根系生态位特征[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(24):69-73.
本文引用 [1]
[25]
MURLEY C B, SHARMA S, WARREN J G, et al. Yield response of corn and grain sorghum to row offsets on subsurface drip laterals[J]. Agricultural water management, 2018, 208:357-362.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.06.038
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378377418309181
本文引用 [1]
[26]
XU Z Z, YU Z W, WANG D, et al. Nitrogen accumulation and translocation for winter wheat under different irrigation regimes[J]. Journal of agronomy and crop science, 2005, 191(6):439-449.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.2005.191.issue-6
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/jac/191/6
[27]
FAN Y, WANG Z, LIAO D, et al. Uptake and utilization of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium as related to yield advantage in maize-soybean intercropping under different row configurations[J]. Scientific reports, London: Nature publishing group, 2020, 10(1):9504.
本文引用 [1]
[28]
王月福, 于振文, 李尚霞, 等. 土壤肥力和施氮量对小麦氮素吸收运转及籽粒产量和蛋白质含量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003(11):1868-1872.
本文引用 [1] 摘要
在不同土壤肥力条件下，研究了施氮量对小麦氮素吸收、转化及籽粒产量和蛋白质含量的影响。结果表明，增施氮肥可以提高小麦各生育阶段的吸氮强度，尤以生育后期提高的幅度为大认为是增施氮肥提高小麦籽粒产量和蛋白质含量的基础，增施氮肥虽提高了小麦植株的吸氮强度。吸氮量增加，但开花后营养器官氮素向籽粒中的转移率降低，增施氮肥不仅促进了小麦植株对肥料氮的吸收，而且也促进了对土壤氮的吸收，并讨论了在高、低土壤肥力条件下氮肥合理运筹的问题。
[29]
REN Y, ZHANG L, YAN M, et al. Effect of sowing proportion on above- and below-ground competition in maize-soybean intercrops[J]. Scientific reports, Berlin: Nature portfolio, 2021, 11(1):15760.
本文引用 [1]
[30]
王旭洋, 范兴科. 水肥一体化滴灌条件下氮素在土壤中的时空分布特征[J]. 节水灌溉, 2016(6):55-58.
本文引用 [1] 摘要
水肥一体化灌溉是提高水肥利用效率的主要途径之一。试验采取单点原滴水施肥模拟滴灌条件下水肥一体化灌溉施肥过程，研究滴灌条件下氮素中的NO3--N和NH4+-N在土壤湿润体中的时空分布特征。结果表明，在灌水施肥结束后的1周时间内，土壤湿润体中NO3--N和NH4+-N在靠近灌水施肥点处的含量较高，由灌水点向外，随着距离的增大，其含量逐渐减小，在土壤湿润体的边缘，即湿润锋处，氮素的含量最低。随着时间的推移，NO3--N和NH4+-N的分布变化表现为：NO3--N的含量先增大后减小，在第5天达到最大值，此后含量有所降低。而NH4+-N的含量相对较低，其含量始终低于NO3--N的含量，且一直在减小，特别是在第3天以后迅速减小，到第5天时湿润体内NH4+-N的含量甚至低于灌水前风干土的含量。
Share on Mendeley
PDF(2340 KB)

91

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail
Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉