
The Phenological Characteristics of Menyuan Tamarisk and Their Response to Climate Change
QI Ruying, NIE Yongxi, ZHONG Cun
The Phenological Characteristics of Menyuan Tamarisk and Their Response to Climate Change
The tamarisk phenological and temperature data from 1988 to 2020 obtained by Menyuan National Basic Meteorological Station were used, and the change characteristics of Menyuan tamarisk and their response to climate change in spring and autumn (bud opening, leaf spreading, flowering, leaf discoloration and defoliation) were studied by correlation analysis. The results showed that: (1) the phenological phase in spring had an earlier trend, the flowering period was earlier obviously, and the phenological phase in autumn presented a delayed trend; (2) the average growing period of Menyuan tamarisk was 168 days, and the growing period showed a significant lengthening trend with the changing rate of 13 d/10 a; (3) from 1988 to 2020, the annual and seasonal average temperature in Menyuan County had an increasing trend, which was consistent with global warming, the climate tendency rate of the annual average temperature change was 0.54℃/10 a, indicating that the annual average temperature increased by about 1.7℃ in 32 years; (4) the tamarisk phenological phase in spring was very sensitive to the change of temperature, getting earlier with the rising of temperature; (5) during 1988 to 2020, the annual average temperature of Menyuan and the phenological phase of tamarisk did not change abruptly. In summary, Menyuan tamarisk was sensitive to climate change. Therefore, the study on the response of Menyuan tamarisk to climate change in Qilian Mountains’ ecological vulnerable areas has certain reference value for ecological environmental monitoring and management.
tamarisk / phenological phase / woody plants / Qilian Mountains / global warming / abrupt change {{custom_keyword}} /
表1 1988—2020年门源红柳春、秋季物候期观测资料(月/日) |
物候期 | 春季 | 秋季 | ||||||||||||||
芽开放期 | 展叶期 | 开花期 | 叶变色期 | 落叶期 | ||||||||||||
叶芽 | 始期 | 盛期 | 始期 | 盛期 | 末期 | 始变 | 全变 | 始期 | 末期 | |||||||
平均 | 4/23 | 5/5 | 5/12 | 5/3 | 5/9 | 5/21 | 8/30 | 10/6 | 9/6 | 10/20 | ||||||
最早 | 3/31 | 4/26 | 5/2 | 4/18 | 4/26 | 4/28 | 7/11 | 9/3 | 7/13 | 9/19 | ||||||
最晚 | 5/14 | 5/25 | 6/4 | 6/10 | 6/20 | 6/27 | 9/20 | 10/24 | 10/5 | 11/2 |
表2 1988—2020年门源红柳物候期趋势变化率(d/a) |
春季 | 秋季 | |||||||||
芽开放期 | 展叶期 | 开花期 | 叶变色期 | 落叶期 | ||||||
物候期 | 叶芽 | 始期 | 盛期 | 始期 | 盛期 | 末期 | 始变 | 全变 | 始期 | 末期 |
变化率 | -0.205 | -0.712** | -0.815** | -1.029** | -1.056** | -1.246** | 0.313 | 0.861** | 0.014 | 0.577** |
注:*表示在0.05水平(双侧)上显著相关;**表示在0.01水平(双侧)上显著相关。下同。 |
表3 门源红柳展叶和开花物候期与不同时段气温的相关性 |
物候期 | 1月 | 2月 | 3月 | 4月 | 5月 | 3—4月 | 春季 | 冬季 | 年平均 |
展叶始期 | -0.380* | -0.435* | -0.353* | -0.585** | -0.490** | -0.615** | -0.702** | -0.519** | -0.785** |
展叶盛期 | -0.457** | -0.416* | -0.339 | -0.544** | -0.533** | -0.578** | -0.685** | -0.531** | -0.780** |
开花始期 | -0.481** | -0.211 | -0.168 | -0.29 | -0.372* | -0.301 | -0.387* | -0.420* | -0.546** |
开花盛期 | -0.441* | -0.182 | -0.203 | -0.273 | -0.262 | -0.273 | -0.322 | -0.423* | -0.509** |
开花末期 | -0.469** | -0.206 | -0.269 | -0.319 | -0.198 | -0.316 | -0.337 | -0.470** | -0.558** |
表4 门源红柳展叶和开花物候期距平与春季气温距平的回归分析 |
物候期 | 回归系数 | 相关系数 | 气温升高1℃ 物候期提前天数 |
展叶始期 | -6.649 | -0.702** | -6.6 |
展叶盛期 | -7.522 | 0.968** | -7.5 |
开花始期 | -6.538 | 0.669** | -6.5 |
开花盛期 | -5.778 | 0.617** | -5.8 |
开花末期 | -6.951 | 0.583** | -7.0 |
[1] |
农业气象观测规范[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 1993.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[2] |
顾润源, 周伟灿, 白美兰, 等. 气候变化对内蒙古草原典型植物物候的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(3):767-776.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[3] |
徐韵佳, 戴君虎, 王焕炯, 等. 1985—2012年哈尔滨自然历主要物候期变动特征及对气温变化的响应[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(9):1662-1674.
利用中国物候观测网观测数据,新编制了哈尔滨地区1985-2012年的自然历。通过与原自然历(1963-1984年)比较,揭示了近30年以来哈尔滨地区21个植物99个物候期的变化特征,并通过物候期与气温的相关分析探讨了物候变化原因。结果表明:自1985年以来,哈尔滨的春季、夏季、秋季的物候期开始日期提前,冬季开始日期推迟。其中春季(以白榆叶芽膨大期为代表)、夏季(以暴马丁香开花始期为代表)、秋季(以金银忍冬果实成熟期为代表)分别提前了7天、6天和19天,冬季(以胡桃楸落叶末期为代表)推迟了2天。各物候期在春季、夏季、秋季的平均日期相较于原自然历提前了3~11天,在冬季推迟了3天。四季各物候期最早日期均以提前为主,夏冬季物候期最晚日期有所推迟。另外,各季节内部分物候期出现的先后次序发生了变化。近30年该地区气温的升高是物候季节开始日期提前的首要原因。且不同植物和物候期对气温变化的响应敏感性不同可解释物候季节内物候期先后次序的变化。
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[4] |
高祺, 缪启龙, 岳艳霞. 河北省木本植物物候变化特征及其对气候变暖的响应[J]. 中国农业气象, 2011, 32(1):17-22.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[5] |
李红梅, 马玉寿, 王彦龙. 气候变暖对青海高原地区植物物候期的影响[J]. 应用气象学报, 2010, 21(4):500-505.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[6] |
李国玉, 聂永喜, 达娃央宗, 等. 青海贵南自然物侯对气候变化的响应研究[J]. 农业灾害研究, 2020, 10(2):29-32,36.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[7] |
豆青芳, 肖莲桂, 石明章, 等. 55年来门源地区气温变化特征分析[J]. 青海环境, 2016, 26(4):171-175.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[8] |
魏凤英. 现代气候统计诊断与预报技术[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2007:37-59.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[9] |
符淙斌, 王强. 气候突变的定义和检测方法[J]. 大气科学, 1992, 16(4):482-493.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[10] |
蒋菊芳, 王鹤龄, 魏育国, 等. 河西走廊东部不同类型植物物候对气候变化的响应[J]. 中国农业气象, 2011, 32(4):543-549.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[11] |
雷俊, 姚玉璧, 孙润, 等. 黄土高原半干旱区物候变化特征及其对气候变暖的响应[J]. 中国农业气象, 2017, 38(1):1-8.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[12] |
郑景云, 葛全胜, 赵会霞. 近40年中国植物物候对气候变化的响应研究[J]. 中国农业气象, 2003(1):29-33.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[13] |
张福春. 气候变化对中国木本植物物候的可能影响[J]. 地理学报, 1995(5):402-410.
本文根据我国近30年的物候资料和气候资料的统计分析,论证了气温是影响中国木本植物物候的主要因子,在此基础上建立了物候与年平均气温的线性统计模式,又利用此模式分别计算了未来全球年平均气温升高0.5–2.0℃和未来大气中CO<sub>2</sub>浓度倍增而增暖情况下,我国主要木本植物物候期的大致变幅。
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[14] |
郑景云, 葛全胜, 郝志新. 气候增暖对我国近40年植物物候变化的影响. 科学通报, 2002, 47(20):1582-1587.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
{{custom_ref.label}} |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
Collection(s)
/
〈 |
|
〉 |