PDF(1273 KB)
The Field Application Effect of a Compound Microbial Agent on Sweet and Crisp Pea
DING Xueshuang, ZHU Hongqing, DING Yingfeng, YAO Qiaomin, ZHANG Qingqing, YAO Chunxin, ZHOU Xiaogang, YANG Jiazhen, DING Yumei, CHEN Jia
PDF(1273 KB)
PDF(1273 KB)
The Field Application Effect of a Compound Microbial Agent on Sweet and Crisp Pea
In order to investigate the application effect of compound microbial agent 615 on sweet and crisp pea cultivation, the sweet and crisp pea variety ‘Changshouren’ was used as material, the effects of four fertilization treatments (i. e. no fertilizer as control, single application of compound microbial agent 615, single application of chemical fertilizer, combined application of chemical fertilizer and compound microbial agent 615) on the main agronomic traits, yield and quality, rhizosphere soil microbial communities of sweet and crisp pea were studied. The results showed that: the pod bearing rate of sweet and crisp pea in all fertilization treatments were significantly increased by 7.90%-12.49%, and the disease incidence rate was reduced by 10.83% in the treatment of single application of compound microbial agent 615. In all fertilization treatments, the average plot yield was significantly raised by 10.75%-19.82%, among them, the combined application of chemical fertilizer and compound microbial agent 615 had the biggest increase of 19.82%. The content of total sugar, protein and starch in fresh seeds under the single application of compound microbial agent 615 was increased by 50.00%, 9.24% and 59.37%, respectively (p<0.05); and the number of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes in rhizosphere soil at anthesis reached 1.93 times, 2.38 times and 2.36 times of those at seedling stage. The combined application of chemical fertilizer and compound microbial agent 615 improved the content of sugar and starch(p<0.05). Considering the integrated ecological and economic benefits, it is recommended that the combined application of chemical fertilizer and compound microbial agent 615 should be conducted in planting sweet and crisp pea under field condition.
sweet and crisp pea / compound microbial agent / agronomic traits / yield / quality {{custom_keyword}} /
| [1] |
郝曦煜, 李雪, 陈博, 等. 我国豌豆产业发展特征及趋势分析[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2022(2):10-15.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [2] |
吴国云, 马艳, 杨学东, 等. 大理州秋豌豆白粉病田间发生动态及综合防治措施[J]. 云南农业科技, 2021(2):9-11.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [3] |
萧洪东, 王惠珍, 喻敏, 等. 不同品种豌豆营养成分分析比较[J]. 佛山科学技术学院学报:自然科学版, 2015, 33(2):15-17,21.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [4] |
袁仕良, 丁学双, 黄应家, 等. 祥云县秋甜脆豌豆根腐病发生情况及重发生原因分析[J]. 云南农业科技, 2022(1):35-37.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [5] |
刘劲哲, 樊永强, 王彦辉, 等. 豌豆褐纹病基腐病枯萎病芽枯病研究[J]. 青海农林科技, 2021(3):94-96.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [6] |
邱佳文. 生防根瘤菌Sneb183调控大豆异黄酮代谢抗胞囊线虫机理研究[D]. 沈阳农业大学,2018.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [7] |
严建辉. 施用复合微生物菌剂对几种农作物产量品质及土壤养分状况的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2018, 8(12):35-39.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [8] |
谢东锋, 王国强, 谢荣, 等. 不同微生物菌肥处理连作土壤对黄瓜生长及防御性酶的影响[J]. 福建农业学报, 2018, 33(7):696-701.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [9] |
孙成成, 丁伟, 潘兴兵, 等. 影响微生物菌剂应用稳定性的因素分析[J]. 植物医生, 2019, 32(4):19-23.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [10] |
梁永进, 尚海丽, 盘文政, 等. 微生物菌肥对’K326’烤烟生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(23):45-51.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [11] |
杨名佳, 刘丽萍, 王雪, 等. 枯草芽孢杆菌菌剂对人参黑斑病的生物防治效果[J]. 菌物研究, 2021, 19(2):134-138.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [12] |
马二磊, 黄芸萍, 臧全宇, 等. 4种微生物菌剂对多年连作甜瓜土壤真菌群落的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2021, 34(4):15-20.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [13] |
卯婷婷, 陶刚, 赵兴丽, 等. 4种微生物菌剂对辣椒主要病害的生物防治作用[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2020, 36(2):258-264.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [14] |
何嘉, 马婷慧, 白小军, 等. 不同微生物菌剂对枸杞生长发育及产量品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(6):1296-1301.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [15] |
方瑞琳, 王帝, 王雨婷, 等. 不同微生物菌剂对谷子主要农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2021, 33(2):1-6,39.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [16] |
何飞燕, 杜全能, 杨正, 等. 复合微生物菌剂对花生生长及产量的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(14):104-109
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [17] |
李艳宁, 姚振刚, 李建波, 等. 微生物菌剂不同用量对大棚黄瓜产量及土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 中国农技推广, 2020, 36(4):64-65.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [18] |
田慧敏, 郭成, 袁树先, 等. 微生物菌剂在番茄上的应用效果比较研究[J]. 赤峰学院学报:自然科学版, 2021, 37(1):25-28.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [19] |
何永梅, 陈胜文, 孔志强, 等. 生物菌肥的种类及功效[N]. 江苏农业科报,2020-11-28(005).
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [20] |
戴美松, 王月志, 蔡丹英, 等. 我国微生物菌肥登记现状及其在果树减肥增效中的应用[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2021, 62(2):241-246.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [21] |
吕鹏超, 王成慧, 林悦香, 等. 复合微生物菌剂对温室黄瓜生长和品质的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2020, 26(17):47-49,131.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [22] |
温丹, 王晓, 孙凯宁, 等. 不同形态微生物菌剂对不结球白菜生长和品质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021:1-7.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [23] |
李晶晶, 刘聪, 王鑫鑫, 等. 微生物菌剂对青椒生长、品质和土壤养分状况的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2021(13):1-10.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [24] |
汤圆强, 李涛, 张丽莉, 等. 沼液提取物与宛氏拟青霉菌复配对番茄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2021, 34(3):36-41.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [25] |
赵晓玲. EM微生物菌剂不同施用方法对大棚辣椒产量和品质的影响[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2015(8):58-60.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [26] |
张群艳, 来航线, 韦小敏, 等. 生物肥料多功能芽孢杆菌的筛选及其作用机理[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(2):489-497.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [27] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [28] |
赵学通, 徐思琪, 张琪, 等. 核桃专用生物-有机-无机复混肥对核桃种植的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(11):108-113.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| {{custom_ref.label}} |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
PDF(1273 KB)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
