data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50b0b/50b0b1907448008005f1520ac4ac47532387da83" alt=""
Transport of Nitrogen Nutrient Salts in Large-scale Dairy Farming Waste Returning to Field
MEI Ying, LIU Yuqi, ZHOU Hang, TIAN Yanfeng, ZANG Chen, LI Xianhua
Transport of Nitrogen Nutrient Salts in Large-scale Dairy Farming Waste Returning to Field
Dairy farming waste as an organic fertilizer has become a popular trend of dairy farming waste returning to field in China, but it may cause environmental pollution of farmland soil and surrounding groundwater due to its characteristics of a large amount of nitrogen nutrients. In this paper, the field management of 11 types of base fertilizer + topdressing models of large-scale dairy farming waste returning to field was used to study the law of nitrogen transport in farmland soil and soil aqueous solution. The results showed that the average content of total nitrogen in the soil of different depths under field management showed a gradually decreasing trend as the depth increased; the amount of nitrogen applied was significantly and positively correlated with the average content of nitrate nitrogen in the soil of different depths; nitrate nitrogen was the main form of nitrogen in the soil aqueous solution. Fertilization was the main source of farmland nitrogen input, and leaching was the main item of farmland nitrogen output; only relying on biological nitrogen fixation and atmospheric deposition as the source of nitrogen input would cause soil nitrogen depletion. Base fertilizer of 100% liquid fertilizer + topdressing of 100% liquid fertilizer (Q100100) field management was most likely to cause excess nitrogen in the soil; solid fertilizer and 50% liquid fertilizer as base fertilizer+ topdressing of 75% liquid fertilizer (SQ5075) was most prone to nitrogen leaching. Solid fertilizer and 75% liquid fertilizer as base fertilizer + topdressing of 75% liquid fertilizer (SQ7575) had the least loss of nitrogen from leaching, and was more conducive to plant growth and the accumulation of nitrogen in soil.
dairy farming waste returning to field / field management / fertilization / total nitrogen / nitrate nitrogen / ammonium nitrogen {{custom_keyword}} /
表1 大田施肥田间管理措施 |
田间管理 | 基肥 | 追肥 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
固肥 | 液肥 | 清水 | 液肥 | 清水 | ||
SQ7575 | 182 | 1280 | 400 | 1280 | 400 | |
SQ7550 | 182 | 1280 | 400 | 840 | 840 | |
SQ7525 | 182 | 1280 | 400 | 400 | 1280 | |
SQ5075 | 182 | 840 | 840 | 1280 | 400 | |
SQ5050 | 182 | 840 | 840 | 840 | 840 | |
SQ5025 | 182 | 840 | 840 | 400 | 1280 | |
Q100100 | 0 | 1680 | 0 | 1680 | 0 | |
Q7575 | 0 | 1280 | 400 | 1280 | 400 | |
Q5050 | 0 | 840 | 840 | 840 | 840 | |
Q2525 | 0 | 400 | 1280 | 400 | 1280 | |
Q00 | 0 | 0 | 1680 | 0 | 1680 |
注:S表示固肥;Q表示液肥;数字依次表示基肥、追肥中液肥的浓度。 |
表2 连续2年施肥后土壤氮平衡状况 |
田间 管理 | 氮输入 | 氮输出 | 盈余 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
肥料 | 生物固氮 | 大气沉降 | 种子 | 合计 | 作物 | 淋失 | 损失 | 反硝化 | 合计 | |||
SQ7575 | 307.3 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 0.1 | 314.9 | 5.7 | 12.9 | 0.9 | 19.4 | 38.9 | 276.1 | |
SQ7550 | 271 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 0.1 | 278.6 | 3.9 | 24.6 | 0.6 | 19.8 | 48.9 | 229.8 | |
SQ7525 | 234.7 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 0.1 | 242.3 | 4.1 | 26 | 0.6 | 19.7 | 50.4 | 191.9 | |
SQ5075 | 240.6 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 0.1 | 248.2 | 3.8 | 35.4 | 0.9 | 19.4 | 59.6 | 188.6 | |
SQ5050 | 204.3 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 0.1 | 211.9 | 3.5 | 34 | 0.5 | 19.8 | 57.8 | 154.1 | |
SQ5025 | 168 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 0.1 | 175.6 | 4.4 | 22.9 | 0.5 | 19.8 | 47.6 | 128 | |
Q100100 | 393.4 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 0.1 | 401.1 | 4.2 | 27.1 | 1 | 19.4 | 51.6 | 349.4 | |
Q7575 | 299.8 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 0.1 | 307.4 | 3.7 | 26.7 | 0.6 | 19.7 | 50.7 | 256.7 | |
Q5050 | 196.7 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 0.1 | 204.3 | 3.2 | 24.5 | 0.9 | 19.4 | 48 | 156.3 | |
Q2525 | 93.7 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 0.1 | 101.3 | 2.7 | 19.1 | 0.7 | 19.6 | 42.1 | 59.2 | |
Q00 | 0 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 0.1 | 7.6 | 0.8 | 23.1 | 0.1 | 20.3 | 44.2 | -36.6 |
表3 不同田间管理各深度TN、NO-3-N和NH+4-N 含量平均值 |
田间 管理 | 平均施氮量/ (g/m2) | 土壤水溶液平均含氮量/(mg/kg) | 土壤平均含氮量/(mg/kg) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TN | NO-3-N | NH+4-N | TN | NO-3-N | NH+4-N | |||
SQ7575 | 153.66 | 72.87 | 54.64 | 0.47 | 463.88 | 15.12 | 2.38 | |
SQ7550 | 135.51 | 110.94 | 91.49 | 0.66 | 409.6 | 12.47 | 1.35 | |
SQ7525 | 117.36 | 94.73 | 81.37 | 0.85 | 409.32 | 10.57 | 1.76 | |
SQ5075 | 120.29 | 138.45 | 112.82 | 0.92 | 388.12 | 20.76 | 1.15 | |
SQ5050 | 102.14 | 123.23 | 100.62 | 0.80 | 420.95 | 19.52 | 0.99 | |
SQ5025 | 83.99 | 110.53 | 90.88 | 0.60 | 359.54 | 16.08 | 2.12 | |
Q100100 | 196.72 | 98.64 | 74.67 | 0.84 | 310.64 | 24.96 | 1.21 | |
Q7575 | 149.88 | 109.59 | 84.67 | 0.75 | 343.87 | 21.55 | 1.08 | |
Q5050 | 98.36 | 84.41 | 57.46 | 1.19 | 344.25 | 16.53 | 2.12 | |
Q2525 | 46.84 | 52.07 | 47.23 | 0.89 | 387.16 | 16.42 | 1.18 | |
Q00 | 0 | 70.33 | 54.62 | 0.90 | 298.83 | 4.82 | 1.69 | |
背景值 | — | — | — | — | 201.25 | 11.26 | 1.23 |
[1] |
国家统计局, 农村社会经济调查司. 2019中国农村统计年鉴[M]. 中国统计出版社, 2019.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[2] |
国家统计局, 环境保护部. 2011中国环境年鉴[M]. 中国统计出版社, 2011.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[3] |
韩爽, 夏春龙, 王永东, 等. 大伙房水库控制流域水质变化及污染源识别[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(7):1568-1575.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[4] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[5] |
翟留博. 典型地区奶牛养殖体系氨气排放特征与减排途径[D]. 保定:河北农业大学, 2015.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[6] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[7] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[8] |
王萌, 王敬贤, 刘云, 等. 湖北省三峡库区1991—2014年农业非点源氮磷污染负荷分析[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(2):294-301.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[9] |
任凤玲, 张旭博, 孙楠, 等. 施用有机肥对中国农田土壤微生物量影响的整合分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(1):119-128.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[10] |
刘沙沙, 李兵, 张古彬, 等. 有机肥替代化肥对豫东地区上海青生长及氮磷利用的影[J]. 农学学报, 2019, 9(8):14-18,47.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[11] |
周伟, 吕腾飞, 杨志平, 等. 氮肥种类及运筹技术调控土壤氮素损失的研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(9):3051-3058.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[12] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[13] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[14] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[15] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[16] |
谢云, 王延华, 杨浩. 土壤氮素迁移转化研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(8):3442-3444,3462.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[17] |
韩莹. 基于单元格网的太湖上游流域土壌氮、磷平衡研巧[D]. 南京:中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所, 2012.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[18] |
张欢. 太湖地区施肥种类与强度对农田土壤氮平衡及氮流失影响研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2014.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[19] |
张鹏, 张然然, 都韶婷. 植物体对硝态氮的吸收转运机制研究进展[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(3):752-762.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[20] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[21] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[22] |
周伟, 吕腾飞, 杨志平, 等. 氮肥种类及运筹技术调控土壤氮素损失的研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(9):3051-3058.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[23] |
朱兆良, 文启孝. 中国土壤氮素[M]. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 1992.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[24] |
何文天. 基于作物—土壤模型的作物产量与农田氮素平衡模拟研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2017.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[25] |
赵秀春, 王成见, 孟春霞. 青岛市地下水中硝酸盐氮的污染及其影响因素分析[J]. 水文, 2008(5):94-96.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[26] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[27] |
汪涛, 朱波, 高美荣, 等. 川中丘陵区典型小流域地下水硝酸盐污染分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2006(3):84-87.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[28] |
王军. 硝态氮和铵态氮配施对烤烟叶片碳氮代谢及产质量的影响[D]. 南宁:广西大学, 2006.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[29] |
周英霞. 农田尺度土壤水肥盐时空分布与棉花生长特征研究[D]. 西安:西安理工大学, 2019.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[30] |
葛顺峰, 姜远茂, 彭福田, 等. 春季有机肥和化肥配施对苹果园土壤氨挥发的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(5):199-203.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
{{custom_ref.label}} |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
Collection(s)
/
〈 |
|
〉 |