Fruit Quality of Majia Pomelo and Pinghe Red Pomelo: A Comparison Study

Zhang Li, Wang Ruiqing, Zhao Gang, Wang Aibin, Lin Guowei

PDF(1358 KB)
PDF(1358 KB)
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (22) : 126-130. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0088

Fruit Quality of Majia Pomelo and Pinghe Red Pomelo: A Comparison Study

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Comprehensive analysis of the quality characteristics of Guangfeng Majia pomelo was conducted to provide a basis for its brand promotion and fruit deep processing. Using Pinghe red pomelo as control, various parameters on appearance, flavor, nutritional and sensory quality of Majia pomelo were analyzed and compared. The results showed that the single fruit weight and lateral diameter of Majia pomelo were 59.0% and 32.0% higher than those of Pinghe red pomelo, respectively. The juice yield rate of the pulp of Majia pomelo was significantly higher than that of Pinghe red pomelo, which was 80.95%. Majia pomelo is a high-sweet, low-acid fruit, its content of glucose and fructose were 78.8% and 42.9% higher than those of Pinghe red pomelo, respectively, but the difference of sucrose and total sugar content was not obvious. The titratable acid content and citric acid content of Majia pomelo were significantly lower than those of Pinghe red pomelo, while the solid-acid ratio was significantly higher. The vitamin C and carotenoids of Majia pomelo pulp were 1.55 and 1.70 times that of Pinghe red pomelo. Among the mineral elements, calcium content of Majia pomelo was higher than that of Pinghe red pomelo, and there was no obvious difference in other elements. Sensory analysis revealed no significant difference between the two cultivars, except that the taste of Majia pomelo was bitterer. It is concluded that the flesh of the Majia pomelo is juicy and tastes sweet after bitterness, and it is rich in vitamin C and carotenoids, and its free sugars are mainly monosaccharides. Therefore, Majia pomelo has great promotion potential.

Key words

citrus / pomelo / pure pulp juice yield / β-carotene / sensory quality

Cite this article

Download Citations
Zhang Li , Wang Ruiqing , Zhao Gang , Wang Aibin , Lin Guowei. Fruit Quality of Majia Pomelo and Pinghe Red Pomelo: A Comparison Study. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2021, 37(22): 126-130 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0088

References

[1]
张为. 江西国家地理标志保护产品——广丰马家柚[J]. 质量探索, 2012, 9(7):15.
[2]
成传香, 王鹏旭, 贾蒙, 等. 三个中国主栽宽皮柑橘品种制汁品质评价[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2019, 45(24):173-178.
[3]
朱东煌, 王贤达, 沈虹, 等. ‘琯溪蜜柚’砂囊粒化症与采收期的关系[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(26):64-68.
[4]
张涓涓, 杨莉, 刘德春, 等. 马家柚果实品质与土壤、叶片、果实矿质养分的相关性分析[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2015, 37(5):811-818.
[5]
杨莉, 张涓涓, 刘德春, 等. 马家柚及变异品系果实发育期间矿质营养变化及与果实内含物的相关性研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2018, 40(3):479-486,501.
[6]
谢婧蘅, 杨莉, 旦世浩, 等. 套袋对马家柚果实外观及内在品质的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(1):229-237.
[7]
吴方方, 管建丰, 蒋小林, 等. 气象因子对广丰马家柚果实品质的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2018, 47(4):48-50.
[8]
温逸俊, 况晨光. 不同品种柚类在赣西地区适应性研究[J]. 中国果菜, 2016, 36(9):25-27.
[9]
陈永涛, 罗怿, 李金强, 等. 贵州柑橘主栽品种果实品质分析[J]. 种子, 2017, 36(10):110-112.
[10]
Kemp S E, Hollowood T, Hort J. 感官评价实用手册[M]. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 2009:99-103.
[11]
Rosales C K, Suwonsichon S. Sensory lexicon of pomelo fruit over various cultivars and fresh-cut storage[J]. Journal of Sensory Studies, 2015, 30(1):21-32.
[12]
石健泉, 沈丽娟, 卢美玲, 等. 柚品种果实糖、酸含量的分级标准与风味的关系[J]. 广西柑桔, 1994(3):13-17.
[13]
李勋兰, 洪林, 杨蕾, 等. 11个柑橘品种果实营养成分分析与品质综合评价[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(8):228-233.
[14]
潘少香, 孟晓萌, 郑晓冬, 等. 基于ICP-MS的不同品种柑橘中矿物元素的差异性分析[J]. 现代食品科技, 2020, 36(8):333-339.
[15]
Deb A C. Fundamentals of biochemistry (7th)[M]. Calcutta: New Central Book Agency (P) Ltd, 1998:415-418.
[16]
张迪, 谢鸿根, 潘鹤立, 等. 不同品种柑橘果肉中氨基酸的测定与分析[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2018, 47(4):322-326.
[17]
Pangborn R M. Relative taste of sleeted sugars and organic acids[J]. J Food Sci, 1963, 28:726-733.
[18]
Ting S V, Deszyck E J. The carbohydrates in the peel of oranges and grapefruit[J]. J Food Sci, 1961, 26:146-152.
[19]
Doty T E. Fructose sweetness: a new dimension[J]. Cereal Food World, 1976, 21:62-63.
[20]
赵艳艳. 蔗糖以及单体果糖和葡萄糖对大鼠糖脂代谢的影响研究[D]. 无锡:江南大学, 2014.
[21]
Goldenberg L, Yaniv Y, Porat R, et al. Mandarin fruit quality: a review[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2018, 98(1):18-26.
During the last decade, there has been a continuous rise in consumption and global marketing of fresh, easy-to-peel mandarins, with current annual production of nearly 29 million tons. Nevertheless, most of the existing knowledge on quality traits of citrus fruit comes from research conducted on oranges and grapefruit, which are the main products for the citrus juice manufacturing industry; relatively little is yet known regarding the unique fruit quality traits of mandarins, nor about the great diversity in these traits among the various natural sub-groups and varieties of mandarins. In the present review we discuss the physiological, biochemical, and molecular factors governing key fruit quality attributes of mandarins, including fruit colour, size and shape, ease of peeling, seedlessness, flavour, and nutritional quality. Fruit colour, size, and shape contribute to external appearance; peelability and seedlessness to ease of consumption; and flavour and nutritional quality to internal quality. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.© 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.
[22]
Sirisomboon P, Theamprateep C. Physicochemical and textural properties of pomelo (Citrus maxima Merr. cv. Kao Nam Pueng)fruit at preharvest, postharvest and during the commercial harvest period, Philipp[J]. Agric Sci, 2012, 95(1):43-52.
[23]
Assefa A D, Saini R K, Keum Y S. Fatty acids, tocopherols, phenolic and antioxidant properties of six citrus fruit species: a comparative study[J]. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 2017, 11(4):1665-1675.
[24]
陈健乐, 程焕, 陈士国, 等. 提取工艺与果径对柑橘果胶多糖性质的影响[J]. 中国食品学报, 2020, 20(4):1-9.
[25]
苏东林, 李培骏, 张丽萍, 等. 柑橘果胶高效提取及其酰胺化改性制备[J]. 中国食品学报, 2020, 20(10):84-95.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright reserved © 2021. Chinese Agricultural Association Bulletin. All articles published represent the opinions of the authors, and do not reflect the official policy of the Chinese Agricultural Association or the Editorial Board, unless this is clearly specified.
Share on Mendeley
PDF(1358 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/