
Isolation, Identification and Drug Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus from Mastitis and Non-mastitis Milk in Shandong
Zhang Qingqing, Liu Na, Wang Juan, Zhao Ge, Zhao Jianmei, Li Yuehua, Huang Xiumei, Gai Wenyan, Qu Zhina, Liu Huanqi
Isolation, Identification and Drug Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus from Mastitis and Non-mastitis Milk in Shandong
To understand the prevalence and drug resistance of Staphylococcus aureus in different types of milk in Shandong, bacterial isolation, identification and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) test were carried out on mastitis and non-mastitis milk samples from 37 farms. The isolation and identification of Staphylococcus aureus were carried by conventional method and PCR technology, the MIC test was conducted with broth micro dilution methods and the data were analyzed by chi-square test. ①A total of 150 strains of Staphylococcus aureus were isolated with the detection rate of 11.26% (150/1332), and the milk samples of mastitis was significantly higher than that of non-mastitis (P=0.009). ②The distribution tend of MIC of 12 drugs was roughly the same as that of EUCAST. ③The isolated strains were the most resistant to penicillin (91.38%), and there was a significant difference in mastitis and non-mastitis milk samples (P=0.047). ④In 116 separation strains, there were 34 (29.31%) strains of multiple resistance (≥3) and there was no significant difference in mastitis and non-mastitis milk (P=0.611). ⑤The resistance rate of six drugs in Weihai was more than 60% and the resistance rate of only one or two drugs in other regions was above 50%. The detection rate of Staphylococcus aureus in mastitis milk samples was significantly higher than that in non-mastitis milk samples. The isolated strain was highly resistant to penicillin and the problem of multiple drug resistance of mastitis milk samples was serious. Different regions showed different levels of drug resistance.
mastitis / non-mastitis / Staphylococcus aureus / isolation and identification / drug resistance {{custom_keyword}} /
[1] |
刘朝, 王京仁, 张成栋 , 等. 湖北地区奶牛乳房炎病原菌的分离鉴定与耐药性分析[J]. 中国奶牛, 2007(7):35-38.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[2] |
魏凡华, 狄学珍, 许立华 , 等. 银川地区奶牛乳房炎流行病学调查与分析[J]. 畜牧与兽医, 2014,12(46):127-128.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[3] |
邓海平, 蒲万霞, 俞诗源 , 等. 奶牛乳房炎主要病原菌及其分离鉴定方法研究进展[J]. 中国草食动物, 2009,29(2)l:52-54.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[4] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[5] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[6] |
朱江巍, 刘耀川, 张雅为 . 奶牛乳房炎病原菌分离及药物敏感性试验[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2016(2):111-113.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[7] |
王登峰, 李建军, 高攀 , 等. 我国部分省区牛源金黄葡萄球菌抗菌药物敏感性调查[J]. 中国奶牛, 2013(3):47-51.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[8] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[9] |
钟召兵, 侯磊, 孙红华 , 等. 奶牛乳房炎耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌耐药性及mecA耐药基因分型研究[J]. 中国奶牛, 2017(8):41-44.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[10] |
章慧, 戴春风, 韩奕奕 . 上海地区奶牛乳房炎金黄色葡萄球菌耐药性[J]. 乳业科学与技术, 2018,41(2):1-4.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[11] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[12] |
汪宇 . 猪源MRSA和多耐药基因cfr的流行情况调查和传播机制研究[D]. 北京:中国农业大学, 2012.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[13] |
张桂贤, 邵文世, 徐蕾 , 等. 山东临沂地区治疗奶牛乳房炎的药物效果调查[J]. 北方牧业, 2009.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[14] |
郝景锋, 李静姬, 张宇航 , 等. 吉林省奶牛乳房炎病原菌分离鉴定及药敏试验[J]. 动物医学进展, 2016,37(12):126-129.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[15] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[16] |
薛梅, 朱俊平 . 山东潍坊部分奶牛场奶牛乳房炎病原菌的分离鉴定级耐药性检测[J]. 中国动物检疫, 2015,32(8):19-23.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[17] |
王妍慧, 孙礼 . 奶牛乳房炎病原菌的分离鉴定及药敏试验[J]. 山东畜牧兽医, 2014(9):19-20.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[18] |
高攀, 王登峰, 李建军 , 等. 新疆牛源金黄色葡萄球菌抗菌素敏感性调查[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2012,49(11):2134-2139.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[19] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
{{custom_ref.label}} |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |