Loss Rate of Major Supply Chain Models for Four Kinds of Leaf Vegetables in Beijing

PDF(641 KB)
PDF(641 KB)
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7) : 43-47. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15080059

Loss Rate of Major Supply Chain Models for Four Kinds of Leaf Vegetables in Beijing

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In view of the serious postharvest loss of leaf vegetables, the key nodes’loss rate of different supply chains of four kinds of leaf vegetables (lettuce, celery, rape, spinach) in Beijing was studied. Through a field survey of 23 large enterprises and cooperatives and vegetable production bases in 8 districts and counties of Beijing, the authors identified four major supply chain models in Beijing at present, including agriculture super-docking model, processing mode, individual-free market model, supermarket own-brand model, and studied the key nodes’loss rate. The results showed that: the average loss rate of the agriculture superdocking model was the highest, which could be up to 36.05%. The second was the supermarket own-brand model, its average loss rate was 32.64%. The average loss rate of the individual-free market model was the lowest, which was only 24.70%. Lettuce had the highest average loss rate in four major supply chain models, which could be up to 45.81%. The second was spinach, the rate could be up to 39.95%. Rape had the lowest average loss rate, which was only 16.58%. In addition, the acceptance standard of leaf vegetable was set, and the loss rate calculation formula was established. The differences of loss rate among the four main supply chain models and four kinds of leaf vegetables were compared. The study has certain significance on reducing postharvest loss rate of leaf vegetables and meeting the consumers’requirement for fresh vegetable.

Key words

leaf vegetable; postharvest; supply chain; loss rate

Cite this article

Download Citations
Loss Rate of Major Supply Chain Models for Four Kinds of Leaf Vegetables in Beijing. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2016, 32(7): 43-47 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15080059

References

[1]农业大词典编辑委员会.农业大词典[M].中国农业出版社,1998.
[2]杨月欣,王光亚,潘兴昌.中国食物成分表(2002).北京大学医学出版社[M], 2002. 58- 62.
[3]钱骁,李丹,田会清,等. 京城果蔬商户降低物流损耗方法分析[J]. 中国食物与营养, 2012, 18(1): 49-53.
[4]金文斌,董姻然,岳溪,等.乳酸钙处理对鲜切菠菜生理生化的影响[J].食品工业科技,2013, 34(19):303-307
[5]Chen X N, Li B J, Meng L C, et al. Research Progress in Preservation of Postharvest Leafy Vegetables[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 749: 401-407
[6]孟令川,吕莹,陈湘宁.鲜切菜贮藏保鲜技术研究进展[J].中国农学通报, 2013, 29(9):190-196
[7]邵自银.北京市蔬菜供应链构建研究[D].北京: 北京交通大学硕士学位论文, 2009
[8]刘玉朋, 胡宝贵. 基于供应链视角的北京市蔬菜供应体系分析[J]. 北京农学院学报, 2013, 28(3): 56-58.
[9]吴莹. 不同类型零售终端成本利润解构研究[D].东北财经大学,2013.
[10]张晓青. 我国蔬菜流通渠道研究[D].首都经济贸易大学,2014.
[11]张侃. 遂宁市超市蔬菜配送模式优化研究[D].南京农业大学,2013.
[12]谭锋,徐扬,Brian Revell,卢澄. 超市生鲜蔬菜供应链特征及损耗控制[J]. 食品工业科技,2010,01:330-333.
[13]王金平. 基于成本分析的蔬菜供应链整合及其配送管理研究[D].浙江大学,2010.
[14]卢亚杰. 我国超市优质生鲜蔬菜动态定价问题研究[D].北京交通大学,2010.
[15]兰婷婷. 蔬菜供应链管理模式优化策略研究[D].长春工业大学,2014.
[16]盛媛媛. 基于供应链的农产品物流成本分析[D].兰州商学院,2013.
[17]何月红. 蔬菜标准园收后处理中心设施与设备配置研究[D].南京农业大学,2012.
[18]王珊珊. 农贸市场蔬菜零售价格形成问题研究[D].华中农业大学,2013.
[19]孙妮. 江苏蔬菜物流周转箱循环利用模式研究[D].南京农业大学,2012.
[20]李鹏. 蔬菜专业合作社风险管理研究[D].华中农业大学,2012.
[21]仉文静. 寿光市蔬菜冷链物流产业发展研究[D].西北农林科技大学,2012.
[22]刘彬,王书军. 国外降低生鲜蔬菜物流损耗经验及其对我国的启示[J]. 对外经贸实务,2015,02:84-87.
Share on Mendeley
PDF(641 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/