Effects of Soil Water Stress on Photosynthetic Characteristics of Pistacia weinmannifolia in Dry-hot Valley

Huang Junling,Wang Yan,Li Yanmei and Zhan Naicai

PDF(1614 KB)
PDF(1614 KB)
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (16) : 19-25. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb14120137

Effects of Soil Water Stress on Photosynthetic Characteristics of Pistacia weinmannifolia in Dry-hot Valley

  • Huang Junling, Wang Yan, Li Yanmei, Zhan Naicai
Author information +
History +

Abstract

To study the effect of water stress on photosynthetic characteristics of Pistacia weinmannifolia, according to the soil field capacity, the author set different soil moisture content gradients (W1-W6, with soil field capacity of 100%, 80%, 50%, 30%, 10% and 5%, respectively). With Pistacia weinmannifolia as material, the author used Li-6400 to measure the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), stomatal conductance (Gs), transpiration rate (Tr) and water use efficiency (WUE) under 6 different soil moisture gradients, in order to understand the response of Pistacia weinmannifolia to too little or too much water stress, thus to provide certain theoretical guidance and technical reference for vegetation restoration, and breeding and cultivation of Pistacia weinmannifolia in dry-hot valley, Yunnan. The results showed that: (1) under different soil moisture gradients, Pn values of Pistacia weinmannifolia showed significant differences, total Pn presented a ‘down-up-down’ trend, diurnal variation curve was the ‘twin peaks’ type, with obvious phenomenon of lunch break; Pn decline was limited by stomatal and non-stomatal limitation factors, W1 and W2 were limited by stomata, W3 and W6 were limited by the non-stomatal factors; with the declining of soil moisture content, stomatal limitation tended to change to non-stomatal limitation; (2) after 18:00, except the W3, Pn of other treatments showed negative values, respiration was greater than the photosynthesis, the photosynthetic productivity of plants descended and finally the plants died; W3 was the best choice of the moderate moisture, its field capacity and soil moisture content were about 50% and 33.6%, respectively; (3) the stomatal conductance fell with the decrease of the soil moisture content, when the soil moisture content was in W3-W6, the daily change curve of stomatal conductance Gs had no obvious change, it almost had a gentle condition; the Gs value of W1-W6 was the largest at 8:00, mainly caused by air humidity; (4) the water use efficiency WUE increased with the soil moisture content, appropriate drought stress was advantageous to improve Pistacia weinmannifolia photosynthetic productivity and water use efficiency.

Key words

Pistacia weinmannifolia; water stress; photosynthetic rate; transpiration rate; water use efficiency

Cite this article

Download Citations
Huang Junling,Wang Yan,Li Yanmei and Zhan Naicai. Effects of Soil Water Stress on Photosynthetic Characteristics of Pistacia weinmannifolia in Dry-hot Valley. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2015, 31(16): 19-25 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb14120137

References

[1] 谢赞.清香木的繁殖及开发利用[J].林业实用技术,2002(11):28-29.
[2] 王妍,张超,李昆.云南干热河谷地区清香木分布调查[J].林业资源管理,2013(3):156-160.
[3] 吴征镒.云南植被[M].北京:科学出版社,1987:501-534.
[4] 陈闻,赵颖,叶正钱,等.干旱胁迫对5个海岛树种生长及生理特性的影响[J].浙江农林大学学报,2013,30(4):490-498.
[5] 罗永忠,成自勇.水分胁迫对紫花苜蓿叶水势、蒸腾速率和气孔导度的影响[J].草地学报,2011,19(2):215-221.
[6] 崔晓阳,宋金凤,张艳华.不同土壤水势条件下水曲柳幼苗的光合作用特征[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(6):794-802.
[7] 杨全,孟平,李俊清,等.土壤水分胁迫对杜仲叶片光合及水分利用特征的影响[J].中国农业气象,2010,31(1):48-52.
[8] 贾利强,李吉跃,郎南军.水分胁迫对黄连木、清香木幼苗的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2003,25(3):55-59.
[9] 赵琳,郎南军,温绍龙,等.云南干热河谷4种植物抗旱机理的研究[J].西部林业科学,2006(6):9-16.
[10] 郭樑,李莲芳,孙昂,等.云南松胚根与胚轴伸长对遮荫、微波和IBA处理的响应[J].西部林业科学,2014,43(3):110-116.
[11] 张向峰,王玉杰,王云琦.水分胁迫对马尾松光合特性的影响[J].中 南林业科技大学学报,2012,32(7):58-63.
[12] 刘惠.水分胁迫对野牡丹光合生理的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(4):1944-1946.
[13] 曹彤彤,赵丹,王桂凤.水分胁迫对树木光合作用的影响研究综述[J].当代生态农业,2011:112-114.
[14] 张旺锋,樊大勇,谢宗强.濒危植物银杉幼树对生长光强的季节性光合响应Ⅲ[J].生物多样性,2005,13:387-397.
[15] Farquhar G D, Sharkey T D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis[J].Annual Review of Plant Physiology,1982,33(3):317-345.
[16] Ahmed M, Theodore M D, Tiesen C, et al. Water stress and corp load effects on vegetative and fruit growth of ‘Elegant Lady’ peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batch] trees[J].Fruit,2005,60(1):55-68.
[17] 房全孝,陈雨海,李全起.灌溉对冬小麦水分利用效率的影响研究[J].农业工程学报,2004,20(4):34-39.
[18] 高英旭,顾宇书,刘红民,等.辽东山区主要造林树种气体交换特性及水分利用效率[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报,2013,32(7):972-977.
[19] 何炎红,田有亮,林涛,等.水分胁迫对沙冬青气体交换和叶绿素荧光的影响[J].广东农业科学,2014(10):41-47.
[20] 孙学凯,范志平,王红,等.科尔沁沙地复叶槭等3个阔叶树种的光合特性及其水分利用效率[J].干旱区资源与环境,2008,22(10):188-194.
[21] 郑淑霞,上官周平.8种阔叶树种叶片气体交换特征和叶绿素荧光特性比较[J].生态学报,2006,26(4):1080-1087.
[22] 云雷,毕华兴,田晓玲,等.晋西黄土区果农间作的种间主要竞争关系及土地生产力[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(5):1225-1232.
[23] 周琚,魏虹,吕茜,等.土壤水分对湿地松幼苗光合特征的影响[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(1):30-37.
[24] 康利平,张禄.水分胁迫对豇豆幼苗光合特性的影响[J].北方园艺,2012(8):17-19.
[25] 文萍,刘济明,徐国瑞,等.水分胁迫对罗甸小米核桃光合与蒸腾作用的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2013,41(8):57-60.
Share on Mendeley
PDF(1614 KB)

29

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/