Photosynthesis light response curves of different types of sweet potato and model fitting

张磊

PDF(756 KB)
PDF(756 KB)
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (15) : 71-77. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb14110037

Photosynthesis light response curves of different types of sweet potato and model fitting

  • 张磊
Author information +
History +

Abstract

The study aims to reveal the photosynthetic light response characteristics of sweet potato, and select the best photosynthetic response curve fitting model, accurately calculate the main parameters of photosynthetic. Rectangular hyperbolic model, non-rectangular hyperbolic model, exponential function model and modified rectangular hyperbolic model were adopted to fit the photosynthesis light response curves of three sweet-potato varieties (fresh sweet potato, starched sweet potato and purple sweet potato). The maximum net photosynthetic rate (Pnmax) and dark respiration rate (Rd) fitted by rectangular hyperbolic model were more than the measured values, light saturation point (Isat) was less than the measured values. The Pnmax was much more than the measured values fitted by non- rectangular hyperbolic model, but Isat was much smaller than the measured values. However the Isat, Rd and light compensation point (Ic) were fitted by the exponential model much smaller than the measured values. Only photosynthetic parameters values obtained by the modified rectangular hyperbolic model were closest to the measured values, and this model could fit light suppression section of light response curves of sweet potato. By comparing three types of photosynthetic characteristics of sweet potato, the Pnmax and Isat of fresh sweet potato and starched sweet potato were higher than that of purple sweet potato, but Ic and Rd of three sweet potato types had no significant difference. Photosynthetic parameters value is closest to the measured value obtained by modified rectangular hyperbolic model， and this model can be used accurately and efficiently to study photosynthetic characteristics of sweet potato in the future. Fresh sweet potato and starched sweet potato have greater adaptation to light intensity and potential for accumulation of photosynthetic products.

Key words

Sweet potato;light response curve; modified rectangular hyperbolic model; saturation irradiance．

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations
张磊. Photosynthesis light response curves of different types of sweet potato and model fitting. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2015, 31(15): 71-77 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb14110037

References

[1] Awada T, Radoglou K, Fotelli MN. Constantinidou HIA.Ecophysiology of seedlings of three Mediterranean pine species in contrasting light regimes[J].Tree Physiology,2003,23(1):33-41.
[2] Moreno-Sotomayor A, Weiss A, Paparozzi ET,et al. Stability of leaf anatomy and light responseCurves of field grown maize as a function of age and nitrogen status[J].Journal of Plant Physiology,2002,159(8):819-826.
[3] Damesin C. Respiration and photosynthesis characteristics of current 2 year stems of Fagus sylvatica: from the seasonal pattern to an annual balance[J]. New Phytologist,2003,158(4): 465-475.
[4] Robert ES, Mark A, John S B. Kok effect and the quantum yield of photosynthesis[J].PlantPhysiology,1984.75(1):95–101.
[5] 叶子飘.光合作用对光和CO2 响应模型的研究进展[J].植物生态学报, 2010,34(6):727-740.
[6]靳甜甜,刘国华,胡婵娟,等.黄土高原常见造林树种光合蒸腾特征[J].生态学报, 2008, 28(11): 5758- 5765.
[7] 向国红,顾建中,杜云安,等.洞庭湖区园林植物多样性保护与利用的研究[J].湖北农业科 学,2009,(6):1414-1421.
[8] Baly EC. The kinetics of photosynthesis[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B ( Biological Sciences),1935,117:218-239.
[9] Coombs J, Hall DO, Long SP, et al. Techniques in Bioproductivity and Photosynthesis[J].2nd ed.Oxford: Pergamon Press.1986.90-91.
[10] Miko UFK, Graham DF. Investigation of the CO2 dependence of quantum yield and respiration in Eucalyptus Pauciflora[J].Plant Physiology,1987.83:1032-1036
[11] Luo Y Q,Hui D F,Cheng W X, et al. Canopy quantum yield in amesocosm study[J].Agric For Meteorol,2000, 100: 35-48.
[12] Thornley JHM. Mathematical Models in Plant Physiology.London: Academic Press(Inc.)1976: 86-110.
[13] Thornley JHM. Dynamic model of leaf photosynthesis with acclimation to light and nitrogen[J]. Annals of Botany,1998,81:421-430.
[14] Marshall B, Biscoe PV. A model for C3 leaves describing the dependence of net photosynthesis on irradiance[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,1980,120:29-39.
[15] Farquhar GD, Sharkey TD. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis[J]. Annu Rev Plant Physiol MolBiol, 1982.33:317-345.
[16] 孙谷畴,赵 平,曾小平,等.倍增CO2 分压对水稻和叽子草冠层光合潜力的影响[J].生态学杂志,2003,22(4):1-4.
[17] Bassman J, Zwier JC. Gas exchange characteristics of Populus trichocarpa, Populus deltoids and Populus trichocarpa × P. deltoids clone[J]. Tree Physiology,1991,8:145-159.
[18] Prado CHBA, Moraes JAPV. Photosynthetic capacity and specific leaf mass in twenty woody species of Cerrado vegetation under field condition[J]. Photosynthetica,1997.33:103-112.
[19] Watling JR, Press MC, Quick WP. Elevated CO2 induces biochemical and ultrastructural changes in leaves of the C4 cereal sorghum[J].Plant Physiology,2000,3:1143-1152.
[20] 叶子飘.光响应模型在超级杂交稻组合-Ⅱ优明86 中的应用[J].生态学杂志, 2007a,26(8):1323-1326.
[21] Ye ZP. A new model for relationship between light intensity and the rate of photosynthesis in Oryza sativa[J].Photosynthetica,2007,45(4):637-640.
[22] Ye ZP,Yu Q,Kang HJ. Evaluation of photosynthetic electron flow using simultaneous measurements of gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence under photorespiratory conditions[J]. Photosynthetica, 2012,50:472-476.
[23] 闫小红,尹建华,段世华,等.四种水稻品种的光合光响应曲线及其模型拟合[J].生态学杂志, 2013,32(3):604-610.
[24] Lu PL (陆佩玲), Yu Q (于 强), Luo Y (罗 毅),et al. Fitting light response curves of Photosynthesis of winterwheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology(中国农业气象), 2001, 22(2): 12- 14 ( in Chinese).
[25] 焦裕媚,韦小丽.两种光响应及CO2 响应模型在喀斯特树种中的应用[J].贵州农业科学,2010,38(4):162-167.
[26] 叶子飘,于 强.光合作用光响应新模型与传统模型的比较[J].沈阳农业大学学报, 2007b,38(6):771-775.
[27] 廖小锋,刘济明,张东凯,等.野生小蓬竹的光合光响应曲线及其模型拟合.中南林业科技大学学报[J], 2012,32(3):124-128.
[28]王照兰,杨 持,杜建材,等.2009.不同生态型扁蓿豆光合特性和光适应能力[J].生态学杂志,28(6):1035-1040.
[29] 陈功楷,康华靖.鲜食型和菜用型甘薯叶片对光强及CO2 浓度的响应[J].广东农业科学,2013,(17):27-30.
[30] 许大全.光合作用效率[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2002:2-52.
[31] 王满莲,冯玉龙,李 新.紫茎泽兰和飞机草的形态和光合特性对磷营养的响应[J].应用生态学报, 2006,17(4),602-606.
[32] 宗学凤,张建奎,周清元,等.甘薯品种光合生理指标与薯干产量之间关系的初步研究[J].西南农业大学学报,2001,23(3):216-218
[33] 许 可,周 爽,何博文,等.三个甘薯品种光合特性与生产量关系的比较[J].中国农学通报,2010,24(6):172-175.
[34] 张 弥,吴家兵,关德新,等.长白山阔叶红松林主要树种光合作用的光响应曲线[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(9)：1575-15798.
[35] 郭 江,郭新宇,王纪华,等.不同株型玉米光响应曲线的特征参数研究[J].西北植物学报, 2005,25(8):1612-1617.
[36] 刘宇锋,萧浪涛,童建华,等.非直线双曲线模型在光合光响应曲线数据分析中的应用[J].中国农学通报,2005,121(8):76-79.
[37] Chen ZY, Peng ZS, Yang J, et al. A mathematical model for describing light-response curves in Nicotiana tabacum L[J]. Photosynthetica,2011,49:467-471.
[38]叶子飘,康华靖.植物光响应修正模型中系数的生物学意义研究[J].扬州大学学报( 农业与生命科学版),2012,32(2):51-57.
[39] 叶子飘,李进省.光合作用对光响应的直角双曲线修正模型和非直角双曲线模型的对比研究[J].井冈山大学学报(自然科学版),2010,31(3):38-44.
[40]叶子飘,康华靖,陶月良,等.不同模型对黄山栾树快速光曲线拟合效果的比较[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(8):1662-1667.
Share on Mendeley
PDF(756 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail
Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉