Identification and Analysis of Drought Resistance About New Wheat Varieties (Lines) in Sichuan Province

Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2014, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (15) : 39-45. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-3065
23

Identification and Analysis of Drought Resistance About New Wheat Varieties (Lines) in Sichuan Province

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Drought is one of the frequent natural disasters in Sichuan. To cultivate drought-resistant varieties is an economical and effective way to prevent drought. In order to explore the Sichuan wheat varieties (lines) of the drought resistance ability, identification of drought resistance on 15 varieties is drought shed method, and ‘Luohan 7’ as check variety. According to the "Technical Specification of Identification and Evaluation for Drought Resistance in Wheat" standard, the drought resistance index of ‘Chuancongzu125’ was the highest in 15 varieties. The drought resistant ability of W138, ‘10Jian236’, N08-51, BL227, ‘Chuan11131’, BL08512 and 10BMY12 were the medium level. The drought resistant ability of ‘Nan 30-7’, ‘Nei 3416’, L08-969, GHM3, ‘Nan 04-59’, HZ10-28 and Ym09-6 were all in weak level. The results showed that, the plant height was the worst affected by drought, drought resistance coefficient variation between 0.652-0.778, followed by effective panicles, drought resistance coefficient variation between 0.662-0.830, then grains per spike, drought resistance coefficient variation between 0.724-0.866, and finally 1000-grain weight, drought resistance coefficient variation between 0.807-1.013. According to the 15 wheat varieties (lines) results, the drought resistance of Sichuan wheat varieties was weaker than north wheat cultivars.

Key words

winter wheat; drought shed; drought resistance identification; drought resistance index; drought resistance coefficient

Cite this article

Download Citations
Identification and Analysis of Drought Resistance About New Wheat Varieties (Lines) in Sichuan Province. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2014, 30(15): 39-45 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-3065

References

[1] 汤永禄,李朝苏,余秀芳,等.西南旱地套作小麦带式机播技术组装与示范效果[J].耕作与栽培,2010(4):60-61.
[2] 张春辉,黄志英.内江近 44 年干旱特点及成因分析[J].四川气象, 2005,25(3):21-23,29.
[3] 于振文.小麦高产创建示范技术[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2008: 234-261.
[4] 葛培,郭广芳,宴月明.小麦抗旱机理研究进展[J].生物技术通报, 2010(4):22-27.
[5] 冀天会,张灿军,杨子光.小麦抗旱性鉴定方法及评价指标研究Ⅲ综合评价指标的比较研究[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(10):422-426.
[6] 王玮,邹琦,杨兴洪,等.水分胁迫下冬小麦芽鞘长度与抗旱性的关系及其遗传特性的研究[J].西北植物学报,1997,17(4):493-498.
[7] Rebetzke G J, Richards R A, Fettell N A. Genotypic increases in coleoptile length improves stand establishment,vigour and grain yield of deep sown wheat[J].Field Crops Research,2007,100(1):10- 23.
[8] 杨子光,张灿军,冀天会.小麦抗旱性鉴定方法及评价指标研究V苗期抗旱指标的比较研究[J].中国农学通报,2008,24(1):156-159.
[9] 金善宝.中国小麦学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1996:754-758.
[10] 张灿军,冀天会,杨予光,等.小麦抗旱性鉴定方法及评价指标研究Ⅰ鉴定方法及评价指标[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(9):226-230.
[11] 景蕊莲,胡荣海,张灿军,等.GB/T21127—2007,小麦抗旱性鉴定评价技术规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008:1-5.
[12] 王相权,黄辉跃,唐建,等.不同施氮量及种植密度对四川丘陵区冬小麦产量的影响[J].种子科技,2010(12):25-27.
[13] 许海霞,李伟,程西永,等.干旱胁迫对小麦农艺性状的影响[J].中国农学通报,2008,24(3):125-129.
[14] 景蕊莲,昌小平.小麦抗旱种质资源的遗传多样性[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(3):410-416.
[15] 李源,谢楠,赵海明,等.不同高丹草品种对干旱胁迫的响应及抗旱性评价[J].草地学报,2010,18(6):891-896.
[16] 周国雁,伍少云.不同云南小麦种质资源的全生育期抗旱性及与主要农艺性状的相关性[J].华南农业大学学报,2013,34(3):309-314.
[17] Mugo S N, Banziger M. Prospects of using ABA in selection for drought tolerance in cereal crops[J]. Plant Physiol,1992,4(2):112- 116.
[18] Zhao L Y, Deng X P, Shan L. A review on types and mechainsms of compensation effect of crops under water deficit[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2004,15(3):523-526.
[19] 王西成,朱华忠,邱军,等.中国冬小麦新品种动态:2011-2012 年度国家冬小麦品种区域试验汇总报告[R].北京:中国农业科学出版社,2012:362-369.
Share on Mendeley

Collection(s)

Reviews

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/