Analysis of Agricultrual Waterlogging Vulnerability in Jianghan Plain——A Case of Xiantao City

Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2014, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (23) : 237-243. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2681
23

Analysis of Agricultrual Waterlogging Vulnerability in Jianghan Plain——A Case of Xiantao City

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In order to assess the agricultural waterlogging vulnerability of Jianghan Plain, the research area, Xiantao City was selected. 5 factors, cultivated land rate, topography index, drainage capacity, soil seepage density and rescuing ability were presented to define waterlogging vulnerability. Based on these factors the framework for assessing agricultural waterlogging vulnerability was created and agricultural waterlogging vulnerability was evaluated in the 400 m×400 m grid of Xiantao City. The results showed: the crop in Xiantao City was affected seriously by waterlogging disaster. The four categories as light, moderate, high and extreme vulnerability region account 18.7%, 34.0%, 33.2%, 14.1% of the study areas respectively. The serious and extreme vulnerability regions mainly distributed in the southeast and southwest, and they were like ‘V’ shape, while most of the light and moderate vulnerability regions in the middle and north of study area.

Key words

Jianghan Plain; waterlogging; vulnerability; Xianyao City

Cite this article

Download Citations
Analysis of Agricultrual Waterlogging Vulnerability in Jianghan Plain——A Case of Xiantao City. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2014, 30(23): 237-243 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2681

References

[1] Black Cannon P T, Davis I, Wisner B. Nature Hazards, People’ s Vulnerability and Disasters[M].London: Routledge,1994:13-21.
[2] 史培军.三论灾害研究的理论与实践[J].自然灾害学报,2002,11(3): 1- 9.
[3] Xu X,Ge Q, Zheng J, Dai E, et al. Agricultural drought risk analysis based on three main crops in prefecture-level cities in the monsoon region of east China[J].Natural Hazards,2013,66:1257-1279.
[4] 史培军.再论灾害研究的理论与实践[J].自然灾害学报,1996,5(4): 6-171.
[5] 李必华,刘百韬,李正浩,等.江汉平原涝渍地域分异规律研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2003,12(3):285-288.
[6] 喻光明.江汉平原渍涝灾害的初步研究.资源、环境与农业发展[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1992:205-210.
[7] 陆建贤,王国峰,张林康,等.浙北嘉湖平原农田渍害的土壤因素及其特性[J].土壤通报,1997,28(1):1-3.
[8] 盛绍学,石磊.江淮地区小麦春季涝渍灾害脆弱性成因及空间格局分析[J].中国农业气象,2010,31(增 1):140-143.
[9] 陶凯,杜耘,陈斌,等.洪湖地区涝渍灾害脆弱性评估[J].世界科技研究与发展,2008,30(2):177-179.
[10] 胡正选.天门市沉湖区域渍涝灾害现状与治理对策[J].农田水利与小水电,1994,11:13-15.
[11] Quan R S, Liu M, Lu M, et al. Waterlogging risk assessment based on land use/cover change: a case study in Pudong New Area, Shanghai[J].Environ Earth Sci,2010,61:1113-1121.
[12] 刘华山,孟凡庭,杨青华,等.土壤渍涝对芝麻根系生长及抗氧化物酶活性的影响[J].植物生理学通讯,2005,41(1):45-47.
[13] 王留明,王家宝,沈法富,等.渍涝与干旱对不同转 Bt基因抗虫棉的影响[J].棉花学报,2001,13(2):87-90.
[14] 陈洪俭,王世济,阮龙,等.淮河流域夏玉米渍涝灾害及防御对策.安徽农学通报,2011,17(5):86-87.
[15] Shao G C, Lan J J, Yu S E, et al. Photosynthsis and growth of winter wheat in response to waterlogging at different growth stages [J].Photosynthetica,2013,51(3):429-437.
[16] 王扬锋,陆忠艳,马雁军.东北地区渍涝风险气象等级预报[J].江西农业大学学报,2009,31(5):957-961.
[17] 马晓群,陈晓艺,盛绍学.安徽省冬小麦渍涝灾害损失评估模型研究[J].自然灾害学报,2003,12(1):158-162.
[18] 商彦蕊.干旱、农业旱灾与农户旱灾脆弱性分析[J].自然灾害学报, 2000,9(2):55-61.
[19] Birkmann, J, Teichmann K. Integrating disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation: key challenges- scales, knowledge, and norms[J].Sustainability Science,2010,5(2):171-184.
[20] 苏桂武,高庆华.自然灾害风险分析要素[J].地学前缘,2003(10): 272-279.
[21] 刘章勇,刘百韬,谢磊,等.江汉平原涝渍地域农业生态环境特征与评价指标体系[J].长江流域资源与环境,2003,12(1):84-87.
[22] 徐建华.现代地理学中的数学方法[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2002.
[23] 高惠旋.应用多元统计分析[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
[24] 喻光明.江汉平原渍灾害田生态特征的研究[J].生态学报,1993,13 (3):252-261.
[25] 徐瑞瑚,杨礼茂.江汉平原渍害田机理与地下排水治渍[J].地域研究与开发,1995,14(4):62-66.
Share on Mendeley

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/