
湖北主栽品种茄衣烟叶外观质量与理化指标的相关性
张婷, 李金海, 肖少红, 王康, 柳均, 廖晓玲, 陈慧, 俞飞, 彭龙俊, 叶娇娇, 马通
中国农学通报. 2025, 41(1): 148-153
湖北主栽品种茄衣烟叶外观质量与理化指标的相关性
Relationship Between Appearance Quality and Physicochemical Indexes of Main Variety of Cigar Wrapper Leaves in Hubei Province
为明确影响湖北主栽品种‘CX26’、‘CX80’茄衣烟叶外观质量的关键理化指标,测定湖北省2020—2023年‘CX26’、‘CX80’茄衣色差、厚度差、断裂伸长率、烟碱、总糖、总氮等关键理化指标,以及完整度、均匀度、身份、脉相、油分等外观品质指标,通过统计分析发现影响茄衣外观质量的主要理化指标。方差分析结果显示,品种间茄衣烟叶色差、总糖、氯、烟碱、外观质量总分存在显著或极显著差异。描述性统计结果显示,与‘CX26’相比,‘CX80’茄衣的色差、厚度差、总糖含量较低,断裂伸长率、烟碱含量、氯含量、钾含量比较高,总氮含量基本一致,外观质量总分较高。简单相关分析结果显示,与外观质量总分呈显著或极显著正相关的指标是断裂伸长率、总糖、氯,与外观质量总分呈显著或极显著负相关的指标有色差、厚度差。逐步回归和通径分析结果显示,影响‘CX26’茄衣外观质量的关键物理指标是断裂伸长率、色差,影响‘CX80’茄衣外观品质的关键物理指标是断裂伸长率、色差、厚度差。建立的回归预测模型可用于快速、准确判定烟叶外观质量。要提高湖北茄衣外观质量,生产上应关注烟叶的弹性、颜色和身份,着重提高烟叶断裂伸长率,减少烟叶的颜色差和厚度差。
In order to clarify the key physical and chemical indicators that affect the appearance quality of the main varieties ‘CX26’ and ‘CX80’ wrapper leaves in Hubei Province from 2020 to 2023, key physical and chemical indicators were measured. Through statistical analysis, key physical and chemical indicators, including chromatic aberration, thickness difference, elongation at break, nicotine, total sugar, total nitrogen, and appearance quality indicators of wrapper such as integrity, uniformity, body, vein, and oil were determined. The results of analysis of variance showed significant differences in chromatic aberration, total sugar, chlorine, nicotine, and appearance quality scores among different varieties of wrapper leaves. Descriptive statistical results showed that compared with ‘CX80’, ‘CX26’had lower chromatic aberration, thickness difference, total sugar content, higher elongation at break, nicotine content, chlorine content, potassium content, and the same total nitrogen content, with a higher sensory evaluation score. Elongation at break, total sugar, and chlorine were significantly and positively correlated with the appearance quality score, chromatic aberration and thickness difference were significantly and negatively correlated with the appearance quality score. The results of stepwise regression and path analysis showed that the key physical indicators affecting the appearance quality of the ‘CX26’ wrapper were elongation at break and chromatic aberration, while elongation at break, chromatic aberration, and thickness difference were key indicators for variety ‘CX80’. Established regression prediction model can be used to quickly and accurately determine the appearance quality of tobacco leaves. Therefore, to improve the appearance quality of Hubei tobacco wrapper leaves, attention should be given to the elongation at break, chromatic aberration, and thickness difference of tobacco which may affect elasticity and color of tobacco leaves.
湖北 / 雪茄烟叶 / 茄衣 / 外观质量 / 色差 / 厚度差 / 断裂伸长率 / 理化指标 / 回归分析 / 通径分析 {{custom_keyword}} /
Hubei / cigar tobacco leaves / wrapper / appearance quality / chromatic aberration, thickness difference, elongation at break / physical and chemical indicators / regression analysis / path analysis {{custom_keyword}} /
[1] |
高娅北, 钟秋, 王松峰, 等. 雪茄茄衣晾制过程中烟叶颜色和含水量变化及其相关分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2019, 40(2):57-63.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[2] |
闫克玉, 赵铭钦. 烟草原料学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008:306-314.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[3] |
范静苑, 曲平治, 李爱军, 等. Maduro茄衣烟叶的特点及制作工艺[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(33):16353-16354.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[4] |
寇明钰, 汪长国, 戴亚, 等. 不同产地和等级的雪茄烟叶中游离氨基酸含量分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2013, 26(3):963-967.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[5] |
张艳梅, 杨春雷, 饶雄飞, 等. 雪茄茄衣XC26品种干物质积累和氮磷钾养分吸收规律研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2023(11):195-201.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[6] |
时向东, 汪文杰, 王卫武, 等. 遮荫下氮肥用量对雪茄外包皮烟叶光合特性的调控效应[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007, 13(2):299-304.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[7] |
时向东, 张晓娟, 王卫武, 等. 栽培密度对雪茄外包皮烟叶片化学成分和物理特性的影响[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2005, 11(2):40-42.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[8] |
袁育英, 崔俊明, 朱黎明, 等. 优质雪茄包皮烟栽培技术研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(15):6354-6355.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[9] |
时向东, 汪文杰, 顾会战, 等. 遮荫对雪茄外包烟叶光合和水分利用效率日变化的影响[J]. 河南科学, 2006, 24(5):672-675.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[10] |
时向东, 顾会战, 汪文杰, 等. 调制过程中温度对雪茄外包皮烟叶碳水化合物动态变化的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2006, 40(2):133-136.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[11] |
王旭锋. 浙江桐乡茄衣调制和发酵过程中主要化学成分的变化及其质量特色研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2013.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[12] |
李晶晶, 史宏志, 杨兴有, 等. 发酵条件对雪茄芯叶TSNAs及其前体物含量变化的影响[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2019, 25(6):120-125.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[13] |
虞昕磊, 刘俊, 王大爱, 等. 不同发酵温度的茄衣烟叶理化特性和香气质量变化[J]. 中南农业科技, 2024, 45(1):47-55.
为进一步筛选出雪茄茄衣烟叶适宜的发酵温度参数,借助恒温恒湿箱模拟雪茄烟叶精准发酵环境,以发酵环境湿度80%、烟叶回潮含水率30%为固定条件,设置发酵温度40、45、50 ℃ 3个水平,比较不同温度发酵烟叶的外观品质、物理特性、化学成分和香气质量。结果表明,相较于40 ℃发酵温度,45 ℃和50 ℃有利于雪茄烟叶深度发酵,叶面颜色加深、色泽亮度增进,但50 ℃发酵超过3周,烟叶油分损耗明显。发酵后,烟叶颜色参数值都略有下降,3个处理的红色值(a*)、黄色值(b*)差异不明显,45 ℃明亮度最高,50 ℃其次,40 ℃最低。发酵过程烟叶平衡含水率(吸湿性)持续下降,拉力呈先上升后下降的趋势,45 ℃处理烟叶物理性能最优,50 ℃其次,40 ℃略差。发酵后,烟叶蛋白质、可溶性糖、生物碱(烟碱)、色素(叶黄素、β-胡萝卜素)的含量都明显下降,氨基酸的含量基本持平,发酵温度越高,烟碱、色素、蛋白质等代谢越剧烈。发酵后,多数香气物质含量都大幅增加,发酵温度越高,烟叶香气物质总量增幅越大,其中类胡萝卜素降解产物、苯丙氨酸转化产物在45 ℃发酵烟叶中含量最高,棕色化反应产物在50 ℃发酵烟叶中含量最高。由此可知,适当提高发酵温度(45~50 ℃)可有效促进烟叶颜色加深、光泽油润感更佳,烟叶化学成分更协调、香气质量增进更显著,进而获得外观质量、感官品质兼优的茄衣烟叶原料。
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[14] |
张彤彤, 赵君, 余君, 等. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌提升雪茄茄衣烟叶发酵品质机制研究[J]. 轻工学报, 2023, 38(6):93-101.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[15] |
焦芳婵, 贺晓辉, 刘子仪, 等. 不同雪茄烟品系在云南烟区的生态适应性评价[J]. 作物研究, 2023, 37(4):394-399.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[16] |
张婷, 柳均, 黎妍妍, 等. 湖北烤烟香型、香韵及香气物质关系分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 2021, 52(2):385-392.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[17] |
陈一鑫, 肖志鹏, 丁松爽, 等. 衡阳烟区茄衣烟叶综合评价模型构建及栽培品种评价[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2024, 45(2):118-127.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[18] |
刘勇军, 邢卓冉, 时向东, 等. 基于多元统计分析的茄衣烟叶生产气候资源配置[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2024, 43(3):167-175.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[19] |
赵亮, 王硕立, 赵曦, 等. 国内外典型茄衣烟叶常规化学成分和中性致香物质关键性差异指标研究[J]. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(1):79-86.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[20] |
李爱军, 范静苑, 秦艳青, 等. 海南与印尼茄衣烟叶质量差异分析[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2013, 19(4):60-63.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[21] |
高华军, 耿召良, 贺远, 等. 移栽方式和揭膜时期对海南省雪茄烟田杂草控制效果和烟叶产质量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2023, 52(2):47-56.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[22] |
沈晗, 杨凯, 任伟, 等. 影响上部烟叶感官质量的主要化学成分分析[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2019, 25(6):18-26.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[23] |
杜家菊, 陈志伟. 使用SPSS线性回归实现通径分析的方法[J]. 生物学通报, 2010, 45(2):4-6.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[24] |
郭文龙, 丁松爽, 刘路路, 等. 翻堆对初次发酵过程中雪茄茄芯烟叶质量变化的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2021, 52(2):265-373.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[25] |
过伟民, 张艳玲, 刘伟, 等. 烤烟品种间理化特征的差异及其与感官质量的关系[J]. 烟草科技, 2016, 49(5):23-29.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
{{custom_ref.label}} |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |