宁波地区长期非粮化生产对耕层土壤理化性质的影响

应虹, 朱诗君, 金树权, 汪峰, 周金波

中国农学通报. 2024, 40(27): 75-82

PDF(1633 KB)
PDF(1633 KB)
中国农学通报 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (27) : 75-82. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0006
资源·环境·生态·土壤

宁波地区长期非粮化生产对耕层土壤理化性质的影响

作者信息 +

Effects of Long-term Non-grain Production on Soil Physicochemical Properties of Topsoil in Ningbo Area

Author information +
History +

摘要

本研究旨在探究宁波地区长期非粮化生产对耕层土壤理化性质的影响,为非粮化耕地的恢复利用提供参考依据。通过比较采集的全市130个非粮化耕地和53个对照样地的土壤样品,并结合地貌类型(水网平原、滨海平原、丘陵山区、河谷平原)和非粮化种植类型(苗木、果树)进行了系统分析。结果表明:非粮化耕地的土壤pH、有机质含量、土壤容重分别为5.74±0.83、24.72±8.01 g/kg和1.28±0.05 g/cm3,分别显著低于或高于周边水田的6.17±1.02、30.07±10.68 g/kg和1.18±0.05 g/cm3 (P<0.05)。不同地貌类型条件下,非粮化生产对耕层土壤理化性质的影响存在差异,其中对丘陵山区和河谷平原的耕地产生影响较大,导致土壤EC值、有机质和全氮含量均下降10%以上,土壤pH下降至酸性水平(pH<5.5)。2种非粮化生产方式(苗木和果树种植)均会不同程度导致土壤pH、EC值、CEC值、有机质和全氮含量下降与土壤容重上升,但苗木种植的影响程度均要大于果树种植,其中非粮化苗木地的有机质含量为22.90±7.18 g/kg,显著低于非粮化果园和对照样地的30.07±10.68 g/kg和26.87±8.44 g/kg (P<0.05)。研究表明,宁波地区长期非粮化生产导致土壤酸化、地力下降和土壤紧实度提高等问题,同时非粮化耕地的恢复利用应充分考虑地貌类型和非粮化种植类型等因素差异。

Abstract

To provide a reference for the restoration and utilization of non-grain cultivated land, the effects of long-term non-grain production on soil physicochemical properties of topsoil in Ningbo area were explored deeply. In this study, soil samples were collected from 130 non-grain cultivated land and 53 control plots, and then were systematically analyzed based on geomorphic types (water network plain, coastal plain, hilly area and valley plain) and non-grain planting types (nursery land and orchard). The results showed that: the pH, organic matter content and soil bulk density of non-grain cultivated land were 5.74±0.83, 24.72±8.01 g/kg and 1.28±0.05 g/cm3, respectively, significantly lower or higher than that of surrounding paddy fields (6.17±1.02, 30.07±10.68 g/kg and 1.18±0.05 g/cm3, respectively)(P<0.05). Under different terrains, the effects of non-grain production on soil physicochemical properties were different, and the greater effects were found in hilly areas and valley plains. Specifically, there was a decrease of more than 10% in EC, organic matter and total nitrogen content, and pH value decreased into an acidic level less than pH 5.5. The two non-grain production types of nursery stock and orchard both led to the decrease of pH, EC, CEC, organic matter and total nitrogen content and the increase of soil bulk density, and the former had a greater impact. The organic matter content of nursery stock was 22.90±7.18 g/kg, significantly lower than that of orchard and control plots (30.07±10.68 g/kg and 26.87±8.44 g/kg)(P<0.05). Our results indicated that the long-term non-grain production in Ningbo resulted in soil acidification, decreased fertility and increased soil compactness, and the restoration and utilization of non-grain cultivated land should fully consider the differences of geomorphic types and non-grain planting types.

关键词

宁波地区 / 非粮化生产 / 土壤理化性质 / 地貌 / 种植类型 / 复耕利用 / 土壤pH / 有机质含量 / 土壤容重 / 电导率 / 阳离子交换量 / 耕地管理 / 土壤质量

Key words

Ningbo area / non-grain production / soil physicochemical properties / terrains / planting types / restoration and utilization / soil pH / organic matter content / soil bulk density / electrical conductivity / cation exchange capacity / cultivated land management / soil quality

引用本文

导出引用
应虹 , 朱诗君 , 金树权 , 汪峰 , 周金波. 宁波地区长期非粮化生产对耕层土壤理化性质的影响. 中国农学通报. 2024, 40(27): 75-82 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0006
YING Hong , ZHU Shijun , JIN Shuquan , WANG Feng , ZHOU Jinbo. Effects of Long-term Non-grain Production on Soil Physicochemical Properties of Topsoil in Ningbo Area. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2024, 40(27): 75-82 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0006

参考文献

[1]
吴郁玲, 张佩, 于亿亿, 等. 粮食安全视角下中国耕地“非粮化”研究进展与展望[J]. 中国土地科学, 2021, 35(9):116-124.
[2]
李廷强, 郝点. 我国耕地“非粮化”现状及其复耕培肥技术研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6):1703-1712.
近年来,工商资本下乡、土地流转、种植结构调整导致我国耕地“非粮化”现象普遍,直接威胁“18亿亩耕地保护红线”和国家粮食安全。“非粮化”耕地大致分为耕层剥离型和耕层未剥离型两类,前者原有耕层破坏、犁底层缺失,后者可能存在酸化、盐渍化等障碍问题,二者均不同程度地降低土壤肥力,不利于粮食可持续生产。国内外学者针对退化土壤改良做了大量研究,包括客土换土、障碍因子消减、生物培肥等措施,然而针对“非粮化”土壤的整治尚无系统研究成果。本文利用国家统计年鉴数据,结合文献分析,对我国耕地“非粮化”现状及改良、复耕、培肥关键技术进行系统总结,并指出未来的发展方向。
[3]
LIU J, WU L, CHEN D, et al. Development of a soil quality index for Camellia oleifera forestland yield under three different parent materials in Southern China[J]. Soil tillage research, 2018,176:45-50.
[4]
麻万诸, 章明奎, 吕晓男. 浙江省耕地氮磷钾现状分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2012, 38(1):71-80.
[5]
祝锦霞, 徐保根. 基于变化向量的耕地利用方式变化对耕地质量评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(2):292-300.
[6]
魏彬萌, 王益权. 渭北果园土壤物理退化特征及其机理研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(3):694-701.
[7]
郑铭洁, 楼玲, 周成云, 等. 长期非粮化利用对水田碳库及酸度和容重的影响[J]. 中国农技推广, 2020, 36(12):62-65.
[8]
鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
[9]
王飞, 周志峰. 宁波市耕地地力评价及培肥改良[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2012.
[10]
ALFARO F D, MANZANO M, MARQUET P A, et al. Microbial communities in soil chronosequences with distinct parent material: the effect of soil pH and litter quality[J]. Journal of ecology, 2017,105:1709-1722.
[11]
王道泽, 丁志峰, 杨琼瑶, 等. 水田改旱地土壤酸化变化的模拟研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2021, 30(10):56-61.
[12]
TANIKAWA T, FUJII S, SUN L, et al. Leachate from fine root litter is more acidic than leaf litter leachate: a 2.5-year laboratory incubation[J]. Science of the total environment, 2018,645:179-191.
[13]
徐仁扣, 李九玉, 周世伟, 等. 我国农田土壤酸化调控的科学问题与技术措施[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(2):160-167.
[14]
SHI R Y, LI J Y, JIANG J, et al. Ameliorating effects of individual and combined application of biomass ash, bone meal and alkaline slag on acid soils[J]. Soil and tillage research, 2016,162:41-45.
[15]
TANG Y, WANG L, XIE Y, et al. Effects of intercropping accumulator plants and applying their straw on the growth and cadmium accumulation of Brassica chinensis L.[J]. Environmental science and pollution research, 2020,27:39094-39104.
[16]
OORTS K, VANLAUWE B, MERCKX R. Cation exchange capacities of soil organic matter fractions in a ferric lixisol with different organic matter inputs[J]. Agriculture ecosystems & environment, 2003,100:161-171.
[17]
YAN C, YAN S S, JIA T Y, et al. Decomposition characteristics of rice straw returned to the soil in northeast China[J]. Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems, 2019,114:211-224.
[18]
周一鹏, 张雨辰, 罗鑫叶, 等. 土壤有机质空间变异性及其驱动因素研究进展[J]. 土壤通报, 2019, 50(6):1492-1499.
[19]
王峻, 薛永, 潘剑君, 等. 耕作和秸秆还田对土壤团聚体有机碳及其作物产量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(5):121-127.
[20]
林少颖, 赖清志, 刘旭阳, 等. 秸秆及配施生物炭对福州茉莉园土壤碳、氮、磷、铁含量及其生态化学计量学特征影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2021, 41(9):3777-3791.
[21]
ZHOU M, LI Y. Phosphorus-sorption characteristics of calcareous soils and limestone from the southern everglades and adjacent farmlands[J]. Soil science society of America journal 2001,65,1404-1412.
[22]
JIN Z, CHEN C, CHEN X, et al. Soil acidity, available phosphorus content, and optimal biochar and nitrogen fertilizer application rates: a five-year field trial in upland red soil, China[J]. Field crops research, 2019,232:77-87.

基金

宁波市科技创新2025重大专项“非粮化耕地和中低产田产能提升综合技术模式与应用”(2022Z169)
PDF(1633 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/