耕作方式对土壤团聚体微生物及有机碳矿化的影响研究进展及展望

刘新坤, 孙盛凯, 段霄汉, 崔冬梅, 张婷婷, 崔纪超, 朱旭毅, 韩惠芳

中国农学通报. 2023, 39(7): 88-94

PDF(1256 KB)
PDF(1256 KB)
中国农学通报 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (7) : 88-94. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0229
资源·环境·生态·土壤·气象

耕作方式对土壤团聚体微生物及有机碳矿化的影响研究进展及展望

作者信息 +

Effects of Tillage Methods on Soil Aggregate Microorganisms and Organic Carbon Mineralization: A Review

Author information +
History +

摘要

农业碳排放约占全球年均总排放量的25%,为实现中国2060年碳中和的目标,农业对CO2的吸收与排放需达到自然平衡。土壤有机碳(SOC)矿化是具有碳降解功能的微生物分解SOC为作物生长提供养分,向外界释放CO2等温室气体的生物化学过程。农田SOC矿化与作物养分供给、CO2形成和排放紧密相关,但SOC矿化受多种因素影响。土壤耕作是驱动农田土壤碳固定的关键因素,耕作方式对SOC的影响是农业生态系统碳循环研究的重要内容。土壤不同粒径团聚体被视为微生物碳矿化产生CO2的生化反应器,SOC的矿化分解离不开其对微生物以及对应酶的利用。可见,耕作方式通过直接作用改变土壤团聚体结构,进而改变土壤中的微生物类群,最终对SOC矿化产生影响。就此归纳总结了关于耕作方式、土壤团聚体及关联土壤微生物对农田SOC矿化的影响,以期从改良土壤团聚体结构入手,减少农田SOC矿化,为中国实现“双碳”(碳达峰、碳中和)目标提供理论支撑。

Abstract

Agricultural carbon emissions account for about 25% of the annual global CO2 emissions. To achieve the goal of carbon neutrality in China before 2060, the absorption and emissions of CO2 in agriculture need to reach a dynamic balance. Soil organic carbon (SOC) mineralization is a biochemical process of microbial decomposition of SOC which provides nutrients for crop growth and releases greenhouse gases such as CO2 to the environment. SOC mineralization in farmland is closely related to crop nutrient supply, carbon sequestration and CO2 emission, but SOC mineralization is affected by many factors. Soil tillage is the key factor driving farmland soil carbon fixation, and the impact of tillage methods on SOC is an important part of agricultural ecosystem carbon cycle research. Soil aggregates with different particle sizes are regarded as biochemical reactors for microbial carbon mineralization to produce CO2. The mineralization and decomposition of SOC can not be separated from the use of microorganisms and corresponding enzymes. Therefore, the tillage methods directly change the structure of soil aggregates, then change the microbial groups in soil, and ultimately affect SOC mineralization. This review summarized the effects of tillage methods, soil aggregates and associated soil microorganisms on SOC mineralization in farmland, aiming to reduce the occurrence of SOC mineralization in farmland, and provide theoretical support for China to achieve the goal of “double carbon” (peaking carbon emissions and achieving carbon neutrality).

关键词

有机碳矿化 / 土壤耕作 / 土壤有机碳 / 团聚体 / 微生物

Key words

organic carbon mineralization / soil tillage / soil organic carbon / aggregates / microorganisms

引用本文

导出引用
刘新坤 , 孙盛凯 , 段霄汉 , 崔冬梅 , 张婷婷 , 崔纪超 , 朱旭毅 , 韩惠芳. 耕作方式对土壤团聚体微生物及有机碳矿化的影响研究进展及展望. 中国农学通报. 2023, 39(7): 88-94 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0229
LIU Xinkun , SUN Shengkai , DUAN Xiaohan , CUI Dongmei , ZHANG Tingting , CUI Jichao , ZHU Xuyi , HAN Huifang. Effects of Tillage Methods on Soil Aggregate Microorganisms and Organic Carbon Mineralization: A Review. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2023, 39(7): 88-94 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0229

参考文献

[1]
FE D S, TUBIELLO F N, SALVATORE M, et al. New estimates of CO2 forest emissions and removals:1990-2015[J]. Forest ecology & management, 2015, 352:89-98.
[2]
LAL R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security[J]. Science, 2004, 304:1623-1627.
The carbon sink capacity of the world's agricultural and degraded soils is 50 to 66% of the historic carbon loss of 42 to 78 gigatons of carbon. The rate of soil organic carbon sequestration with adoption of recommended technologies depends on soil texture and structure, rainfall, temperature, farming system, and soil management. Strategies to increase the soil carbon pool include soil restoration and woodland regeneration, no-till farming, cover crops, nutrient management, manuring and sludge application, improved grazing, water conservation and harvesting, efficient irrigation, agroforestry practices, and growing energy crops on spare lands. An increase of 1 ton of soil carbon pool of degraded cropland soils may increase crop yield by 20 to 40 kilograms per hectare (kg/ha) for wheat, 10 to 20 kg/ha for maize, and 0.5 to 1 kg/ha for cowpeas. As well as enhancing food security, carbon sequestration has the potential to offset fossil fuel emissions by 0.4 to 1.2 gigatons of carbon per year, or 5 to 15% of the global fossil-fuel emissions.
[3]
SMITH P, HABERL H, POPP A, et al. How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?[J]. Global change biology, 2013, 19(8):2285-2302.
Feeding 9-10 billion people by 2050 and preventing dangerous climate change are two of the greatest challenges facing humanity. Both challenges must be met while reducing the impact of land management on ecosystem services that deliver vital goods and services, and support human health and well-being. Few studies to date have considered the interactions between these challenges. In this study we briefly outline the challenges, review the supply- and demand-side climate mitigation potential available in the Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use AFOLU sector and options for delivering food security. We briefly outline some of the synergies and trade-offs afforded by mitigation practices, before presenting an assessment of the mitigation potential possible in the AFOLU sector under possible future scenarios in which demand-side measures codeliver to aid food security. We conclude that while supply-side mitigation measures, such as changes in land management, might either enhance or negatively impact food security, demand-side mitigation measures, such as reduced waste or demand for livestock products, should benefit both food security and greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation. Demand-side measures offer a greater potential (1.5-15.6 Gt CO2 -eq. yr(-1) ) in meeting both challenges than do supply-side measures (1.5-4.3 Gt CO2 -eq. yr(-1) at carbon prices between 20 and 100 US$ tCO2 -eq. yr(-1) ), but given the enormity of challenges, all options need to be considered. Supply-side measures should be implemented immediately, focussing on those that allow the production of more agricultural product per unit of input. For demand-side measures, given the difficulties in their implementation and lag in their effectiveness, policy should be introduced quickly, and should aim to codeliver to other policy agenda, such as improving environmental quality or improving dietary health. These problems facing humanity in the 21st Century are extremely challenging, and policy that addresses multiple objectives is required now more than ever. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
[4]
刘昱, 陈敏鹏, 陈吉宁. 农田生态系统碳循环模型研究进展和展望[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(3):1-9.
[5]
张萌, 卢杰, 任毅华. 土壤呼吸影响因素及测定方法的研究进展[J]. 山东林业科技, 2021, 51(2):92,100-106.
[6]
LENKA N K, LAL R. Soil aggregation and greenhouse gas flux after 15 years of wheat straw and fertilizer management in a no-till system[J]. Soil & tillage research, 2013, 126:78-89.
[7]
WANG B, BREWER P E, SHUGART H H, et al. Soil aggregates as biogeochemical reactors and implications for soil-atmosphere exchange of greenhouse gases- A concept[J]. Global change biology, 2019, 25:373-385.
[8]
ZHOU H, PENG X, PERFECT E, et al. Effects of organic and inorganic fertilization on soil aggregation in an Ultisol as characterized by synchrotron based X-ray micro-computed tomography[J]. Geoderma, 2013,195-196:23-30.
[9]
ZHONG Y, LI J, XIONG H. Effect of deficit irrigation on soil CO2 and N2O emissions and winter wheat yield[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2021, 279:123718.
[10]
潘根兴, 丁元君, 陈硕桐, 等. 从土壤腐殖质分组到分子有机质组学认识土壤有机质本质[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(5):451-470.
梳理了与土壤生态系统功能相联系的,特别是对固碳减排的土壤有机质本质认识的研究进展及路径,探讨了经典腐殖质学说存在的问题,概述了新近的有机质保护稳定学说及腐殖质组学学说,并追溯了生物标志物有机质分子研究,最后从土壤学的基本理念和理论出发讨论和重新认识土壤有机质的本质及其价值。从形成条件、分离条件和分子鉴定等多方面分析,土壤腐殖质形成和稳定学说越来越显示出局限性;而面向气候变化的碳固定研究可以深入探析土壤有机质的复杂存在状态。越来越认识到土壤有机质是投入土壤的有机物质经不同程度生物利用或降解的产物残留,只是被土壤不同程度地区隔和封闭,本质上仍是分子量变化极大的生命源有机物的集合。因此,可通过生物标志物分子作为靶标在土壤中提取和识别,该技术的发展将孕育萌生土壤有机质分子组学。后者可以用于判读土壤有机质的结构支撑、反应活性和促生功能等方面的本质差别,这些差别可能是由有机分子组成结构及存在状态所决定而不是由有机分子稳定性决定的。从这个概念出发,类似于土壤微生物分子生态,土壤有机质的丰度、组成、结构与功能间的联系可能是土壤有机质本质的核心问题。对这种关系的量化和参数化表征可用以探索土壤有机质永续固定,且可以保持生命活性的土壤有机质的管理策略及技术,并配合土壤的团聚体理论诠释土壤的本质和生态系统功能服务,这将是未来土壤学服务人类可持续发展的理论立足点。
[11]
EDUARDO M, FUENTES J P, PINO V, et al. Chemical and biological properties as affected by no-tillage and conventional tillage systems in an irrigated Haploxeroll of Central Chile[J]. Soil and tillage research, 2013, 126(1):238-245.
[12]
王丽宏, 胡跃高, 杨光立, 等. 农田冬季覆盖作物对土壤有机碳含量和主作物产量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2006(6):64-67.
[13]
刘红梅, 李睿颖, 高晶晶, 等. 保护性耕作对土壤团聚体及微生物学特性的影响研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(6):1277-1284.
[14]
符卓旺, 彭娟, 杨静, 等. 耕作制度对紫色水稻土根际与非根际土壤有机碳矿化的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2012, 26(1):165-169.
[15]
朱咏莉, 韩建刚, 吴金水. 农业管理措施对土壤有机碳动态变化的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2004, 35(5):648-651.
[16]
唐晓红, 魏朝富, 吕家恪, 等. 保护性耕作对丘陵区水稻土团聚体稳定性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(11):49-54.
[17]
ÁLVARO-FUENTES J, CANTERO-MARTINEZ C, LOPEZ M V, et al. Soil aggregation and soil organic carbon stabilization: Effects of management in semiarid Mediterranean agroecosystems[J]. Soil science society of America journal, 2009, 73(5):1519-1529.
[18]
ZOTARELLI L, ALVESl B J R, URQUIAGA S, et al. Impact of tillage and crop rotation on light fraction and intra-aggregate soil organic matter in two Oxisols[J]. Soil and tillage research, 2007, 95(1-2):196-206.
[19]
薛斌, 黄丽, 鲁剑巍, 等. 连续秸秆还田和免耕对土壤团聚体及有机碳的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(1):182-189.
[20]
李玉洁, 王慧, 赵建宁, 等. 耕作方式对农田土壤理化因子和生物学特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(3):939-948.
不同耕作方式对土壤水热、养分及生物特性产生的影响不同,实施合理的农田土壤管理措施不仅可以改善土壤理化性状,也可改变农田土壤生态过程.保护性耕作方式不同程度地改善了土壤质量,免耕能有效提高土壤酶活性,免耕和深松耕等能为土壤微生物的生长繁殖提供丰富的可利用资源,免耕、少耕等能减少对土壤动物的扰动,进而影响到土壤动物的数量、多样性及种群结构.本文综述了不同耕作方式下农田土壤理化性质和生物学特性的研究进展,重点分析了不同耕作方式对土壤理化因子、酶活性、微生物多样性和土壤动物的影响,指出了适宜的耕作方式对土壤质量修复的可能性及研究方向.
[21]
陈升龙. 黑土团聚体的孔隙结构特征与有机碳矿化的关系研究[D]. 长春: 中国科学院研究生院, 2015.
[22]
王浩, 王淑兰, 王小利, 等. 黄土旱塬区三种耕作方式下土壤碳排放与有机碳储量[A].中国农学会耕作制度分会学术年会[C]. 2018.
[23]
ZHANG X, XIN X, ZHU A, et al. Effects of tillage and residue managements on organic C accumulation and soil aggregation in a sandy loam soil of the North China Plain[J]. Catena, 2017, 156:176-183.
[24]
王永慧, 轩清霞, 王丽丽, 等. 不同耕作方式对土壤有机碳矿化及酶活性影响研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2020, 51(4):876-884.
[25]
刘定辉, 蒲波, 陈尚洪, 等. 秸秆还田循环利用对土壤碳库的影响研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2008(5):1316-1319.
[26]
BRIEDIS, CDM J, CAIRES, et al. Soil organic matter pools and carbon-protection mechanisms in aggregate classes influenced by surface liming in a no-till system[J]. Geoderma, 2012, 170:80-88.
[27]
WATZINGER A, FEICHTMAIR S, KITZLER B, et al. Soil microbial communities responded to biochar application in temperate soils and slowly metabolized 13C-labelled biochar as revealed by 13C PLFA analyses: results from a short-term incubation and pot experiment[J]. European journal of soil science, 2014, 65(1):40-51.
[28]
祝贞科, 沈冰洁, 葛体达, 等. 农田作物同化碳输入与周转的生物地球化学过程[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(19):5987-5997.
[29]
DOU X, HE P, ZHU P, et al. Soil organic carbon dynamics under long-term fertilization in a black soil of China: Evidence from stable C isotopes[J]. Scientific reports, 2016, 6:21488.
Effects of different fertilizers on organic carbon (C) storage and turnover of soil fractions remains unclear. We combined soil fractionation with isotope analyses to examine soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics after 25 years of fertilization. Five types of soil samples including the initial level (CK) and four fertilization treatments (inorganic nitrogen fertilizer, N; balanced inorganic fertilizer, NPK; inorganic fertilizer plus farmyard manure, MNPK; inorganic fertilizer plus corn straw residue, SNPK) were separated into four aggregate sizes (>2000 mu m, 2000-250 mu m, 250-53 mu m, and <53 mu m), and three density fractions: free light fraction (LF), intra-aggregate particulate organic matter (iPOM), and mineral-associated organic matter (mSOM). Physical fractionation showed the iPOM fraction of aggregates dominated C storage, averaging 76.87% of SOC storage. Overall, application of N and NPK fertilizers cannot significantly increase the SOC storage but enhanced C in mSOM of aggregates, whereas MNPK fertilizer resulted in the greatest amount of SOC storage (about 5221.5 g C m(2)) because of the enhanced SOC in LF, iPOM and mSOM of each aggregate. The SNPK fertilizer increased SOC storage in >250 mu m aggregates but reduced SOC storage in <250 mu m aggregates due to SOC changes in LF and iPOM.
[30]
CHEN L, LIU L, QIN S, et al. Regulation of priming effect by soil organic matter stability over a broad geographic scale[J]. Nature communications, 2019, 10(1):5112.
The modification of soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition by plant carbon (C) input (priming effect) represents a critical biogeochemical process that controls soil C dynamics. However, the patterns and drivers of the priming effect remain hidden, especially over broad geographic scales under various climate and soil conditions. By combining systematic field and laboratory analyses based on multiple analytical and statistical approaches, we explore the determinants of priming intensity along a 2200 km grassland transect on the Tibetan Plateau. Our results show that SOM stability characterized by chemical recalcitrance and physico-chemical protection explains more variance in the priming effect than plant, soil and microbial properties. High priming intensity (up to 137% of basal respiration) is associated with complex SOM chemical structures and low mineral-organic associations. The dependence of priming effect on SOM stabilization mechanisms should be considered in Earth System Models to accurately predict soil C dynamics under changing environments.
[31]
LAL, RATTAN. Sequestering carbon and increasing productivity by conservation agriculture[J]. Journal of soil & water conservation, 2015, 70(3):55A-62 A.
[32]
PLAZA C, COURTIER-MURIAS D, FERNANDEZ J M, et al. Physical, chemical, and biochemical mechanisms of soil organic matter stabilization under conservation tillage systems: A central role for microbes and microbial by-products in C sequestration[J]. Soil biology & biochemistry, 2013, 57:124-134.
[33]
陈晓芬, 刘明, 江春玉, 等. 不同施肥处理红壤性水稻土团聚体有机碳矿化特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(17):3325-3334.
【目的】在已有团聚体碳氮分布研究的基础上,进一步研究不同施肥处理红壤性水稻土团聚体有机碳矿化特征,并分析有机碳矿化的影响因素,为揭示施肥对土壤肥力的影响及土壤有机碳矿化作用机制提供理论依据。【方法】以长期定位施肥红壤性水稻土为研究对象,包括9个处理:不施肥(CK)、有机质循环(C)、氮肥(N)、氮肥+有机质循环(NC)、氮磷肥(NP)、氮磷钾肥(NPK)、氮磷钾肥+有机质循环(NPKC)、氮钾肥(NK)和氮磷钾肥+1/2秸秆回田(NPKS)。运用湿筛法得到>2 mm、1&mdash;2 mm、0.25&mdash;1 mm、0.053&mdash;0.25 mm和<0.053 mm 5个粒级团聚体,观测团聚体和全土有机碳矿化动态变化,测定团聚体中微生物生物量碳含量和转化酶活性。【结果】全土和>1 mm团聚体有机碳矿化速率在培养前期快速下降,之后逐渐降低至稳定状态,而<1 mm粒级尤其是0.053&mdash;0.25 mm 团聚体,有机碳矿化速率在培养前期降低幅度减小并更早达到稳定状态。有机碳累积矿化量在>2 mm和1&mdash;2 mm团聚体中最高,在0.053&mdash;0.25 mm团聚体中最低。与对照相比,施磷肥处理(NP和NPK)各粒级团聚体有机碳累积矿化量平均提高17.0%&mdash;62.1%,施有机肥处理(C、NC和NPKC)则平均提高25.0%&mdash;80.5%。>2 mm和0.25&mdash;1 mm团聚体对全土有机碳矿化的贡献最大,分别为21.0%&mdash;42.5%和20.6%&mdash;32.7%。>0.25 mm大团聚体微生物生物量碳含量和转化酶活性均高于<0.25 mm微团聚体。施磷肥处理各粒级团聚体微生物生物量碳含量较对照平均高73.4%&mdash;92.0%,施有机肥处理平均高60.8%&mdash;99.6%。磷肥和有机肥的施用显著提高>0.25 mm大团聚体转化酶活性,其中NC处理大团聚体转化酶活性最高,较对照提高46.0%&mdash;135.0%。团聚体有机碳累积矿化量与有机碳、全氮、微生物生物量碳含量及转化酶活性均呈极显著正相关,但与有机碳的相关性最大。【结论】大团聚体在土壤有机碳矿化中发挥主导作用;有机碳含量是影响团聚体有机碳矿化的最主要因素;磷肥和有机肥的施用促进了土壤团聚体有机碳的矿化,是提高红壤性水稻土供肥能力的有效措施。
[34]
杨芳, 段惠敏, 段建军, 等. 温度对黑色石灰土原土及不同粒径土壤颗粒有机碳矿化的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2019, 48(2):68-76.
[35]
安世花, 李渝, 王小利, 等. 长期施有机肥对黄壤旱地不同粒径有机碳矿化的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2019, 47(8):47-51.
[36]
郝瑞军, 李忠佩, 车玉萍, 等. 好气与淹水条件下水稻土各粒级团聚体有机碳矿化量[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(9):1944-1950.
[37]
刘晶, 田耀武, 张巧明. 豫西黄土丘陵区不同土地利用方式土壤团聚体有机碳含量及其矿化特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(3):255-261.
[38]
高菲, 林维, 崔晓阳. 过筛处理对小兴安岭2种森林类型土壤有机碳矿化的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(2):30-39.
[39]
ADEKANMBI A A, SHAW L J, SIZMUR T. Effect of sieving on ex situ soil respiration of soils from three land use types[J]. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition, 2020, 20:912-916.
This study aims to investigate the effect of sieving on ex situ soil respiration (CO2 flux) measurements from different land use types. We collected soils (0–10 cm) from arable, grassland and woodland sites, allocated them to either sieved (4-mm mesh, freshly sieved) or intact core treatments and incubated them in gas-tight jars for 40 days at 10 °C. Headspace gas was collected on days 1, 3, 17, 24, 31 and 38 and CO2 analysed. Our results showed that sieving (4 mm) did not significantly influence soil respiration measurements, probably because micro aggregates (&lt; 0.25 mm) remain intact after sieving. However, soils collected from grassland soil released more CO2 compared with those collected from woodland and arable soils, irrespective of sieving treatments. The higher CO2 from grassland soil compared with woodland and arable soils was attributed to the differences in the water holding capacity and the quantity and stoichiometry of the organic matter between the three soils. We conclude that soils sieved prior to ex situ respiration experiments provide realistic respiration measurements. This finding lends support to soil scientists planning a sampling strategy that better represents the inhomogeneity of field conditions by pooling, homogenising and sieving samples, without fear of obtaining unrepresentative CO2 flux measurements caused by the disruption of soil architecture.
[40]
TRIVEDI P, DELGADO-BAQUERIZO M, JEFFRIES T C, et al. Soil aggregation and associated microbial communities modify the impact of agricultural management on carbon content[J]. Environmental microbiology, 2017, 19(8):3070-3086.
Soil carbon (C) stabilisation is known to depend in part on its distribution in structural aggregates, and upon soil microbial activity within the aggregates. However, the mechanisms and relative contributions of different microbial groups to C turnover in different aggregates under various management practices remain unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the role of soil aggregation and their associated microbial communities in driving the responses of soil organic matter (SOM) to multiple management practices. Our results demonstrate that higher amounts of C inputs coupled with greater soil aggregation in residue retention management practices has positive effects on soil C content. Our results provide evidence that different aggregate size classes support distinct microbial habitats which supports the colonisation of different microbial communities. Most importantly our results indicate that the effects of management practices on soil C is modulated by soil aggregate sizes and their associated microbial community and are more pronounced in macro-aggregate compared with micro-aggregate sizes. Based on our findings we recommend that differential response of management practices and microbial control on the C turnover in macro-aggregates and micro-aggregate should be explicitly considered when accounting for management impacts on soil C turnover.© 2017 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
[41]
ANANYEVA K, WANG W, SMUCKER A. J. M., et al. Can intra- aggregate pore structures affect the aggregate's effectiveness in protecting carbon?[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2013, 57:868-875.
[42]
GUPTA V, GERMIDA J J. Soil aggregation: Influence on microbial biomass and implications for biological processes[J]. Soil biology & biochemistry, 2015, 80:A3-A9.
[43]
KRAVCHENKO A N, NEGASSA W C, GUBER A K, et al. Intra-aggregate pore structure influences phylogenetic composition of bacterial community in macroaggregates[J]. Soil science society of America journal, 2016, 78(6):1924.
[44]
JIANG Y j, SUN B, JIN C, et al. Soil aggregate stratification of nematodes and microbial communities affects the metabolic quotient in an acid soil[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2013, 60:1-9.
[45]
荣慧, 房焕, 张中彬, 等. 团聚体大小分布对孔隙结构和土壤有机碳矿化的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2022, 59(2):476-485.
[46]
N. DAL FERRO, L. SARTORI, G. SIMONETTI, et al. Soil macro-and microstructure as affected by different tillage systems and their effects on maize root growth[J]. Soil & tillage research, 2014, 140:55-65.
[47]
刘满强, 胡锋, 陈小云. 土壤有机碳稳定机制研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2007(6):2642-2650.
[48]
孙慧兰, 李卫红, 杨余辉, 等. 伊犁山地不同海拔土壤有机碳的分布[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(5):603-608.
以乌孙山北坡、科古琴山南坡为例,分析伊犁山地南北坡土壤有机碳的分布特征和影响因素。结果表明:① 0~50 cm范围内,高寒草甸、草甸草原土壤有机碳含量较高,荒漠草原土壤有机碳含量最低。土壤有机碳含量均随土壤深度的增加而降低,高寒草甸随土壤深度的增加土壤有机碳下降幅度最大;② 伊犁山地土壤腐殖化程度高,氮矿化能力强。大部分海拔的土壤碳氮比随土壤深度的增加而减少。河谷南坡碳氮比降低速率要大于河谷北坡。③ 土壤有机碳与全氮、全磷以及土壤含水率表现出良好的正相关性;与pH值表现出较好的负相关性,特别是20~50 cm处。植被类型分布和人类活动影响对土壤有机碳垂直变化影响显著。
[49]
ERIC C. BREVIK. The potential impact of climate change on soil properties and processes and corresponding influence on food security[J]. Agriculture, 2013, 3(3):398-417.
[50]
XIAO H B, LI Z W, CHANG X F, et al. The mineralization and sequestration of organic carbon in relation to agricultural soil erosion[J]. Geoderma, 2018, 329:73-81.
[51]
SCHIMEL J P, SCHAEFFER S M. Microbial control over carbon cycling in soil[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2012,3.
[52]
KUZYAKOV Y. Priming effects: Interactions between living and dead organic matter[J]. Soil biology & biochemistry, 2010, 42(9):1363-1371.
[53]
GUENET B, DANGER M, ABBADIE L, et al. Priming effect: bridging the gap between terrestrial and aquatic ecology[J]. Ecology, 2010, 91(10):2850-2861.
Understanding how ecosystems store or release carbon is one of ecology's greatest challenges in the 21st century. Organic matter covers a large range of chemical structures and qualities, and it is classically represented by pools of different recalcitrance to degradation. The interaction effects of these pools on carbon cycling are still poorly understood and are most often ignored in global-change models. Soil scientists have shown that inputs of labile organic matter frequently tend to increase, and often double, the mineralization of the more recalcitrant organic matter. The recent revival of interest for this phenomenon, named the priming effect, did not cross the frontiers of the disciplines. In particular, the priming effect phenomenon has been almost totally ignored by the scientific communities studying marine and continental aquatic ecosystems. Here we gather several arguments, experimental results, and field observations that strongly support the hypothesis that the priming effect is a general phenomenon that occurs in various terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems. For example, the increase in recalcitrant organic matter mineralization rate in the presence of labile organic matter ranged from 10% to 500% in six studies on organic matter degradation in aquatid ecosystems. Consequently, the recalcitrant organic matter mineralization rate may largely depend on labile organic matter availability, influencing the CO2 emissions of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. We suggest that (1) recalcitrant organic matter may largely contribute to the CO2 emissions of aquatic ecosystems through the priming effect, and (2) priming effect intensity may be modified by global changes, interacting with eutrophication processes and atmospheric CO2 increases. Finally, we argue that the priming effect acts substantially in the carbon and nutrient cycles in all ecosystems. We outline exciting avenues for research, which could provide new insights on the responses of ecosystems to anthropogenic perturbations and their feedbacks to climatic changes.
[54]
马欣, 魏亮, 唐美玲, 等. 长期不同施肥对稻田土壤有机碳矿化及激发效应的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(12):5680-5686.
[55]
张晓曦, 张玲玲, 雷航宇, 等. 草本凋落物与尿素联合修复对油污土壤生物化学性质的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(8):2715-2725.
[56]
MITCHELL P J, SIMPSON A J, SOONG R, et al. Shifts in microbial community and water-extractable organic matter composition with biochar amendment in a temperate forest soil[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2015, 81:244-254.
[57]
卢晓蓉, 尹艳, 冯竞仙, 等. 杉木凋落物及其生物质炭对土壤原有有机碳矿化的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(4):943-953.
[58]
林先贵. 土壤微生物研究原理与方法[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2010:53-249.
[59]
郭婷. 短期耕作和施肥对草甸黑土酶活性和细菌多样性的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2018.
[60]
张乃明. 环境土壤学[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2012:71-72,180.

基金

国家自然科学基金“土壤团聚体多级结构调控有机碳矿化效应的微生物学机制”(32172127)
PDF(1256 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/