欧洲畜禽粪便的管理策略与技术

郭常莲, 李永平, 汤昀, 朱教宁, 庞震鹏

中国农学通报. 2023, 39(5): 135-141

PDF(1201 KB)
PDF(1201 KB)
中国农学通报 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5) : 135-141. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0142
农业信息·科技教育

欧洲畜禽粪便的管理策略与技术

作者信息 +

Management Strategy and Technology of Animal Manure in Europe

Author information +
History +

摘要

探讨了欧洲对于畜禽粪便的管理策略与主要技术。欧洲畜禽粪便管理策略的选择是从养殖业发展、环境与经济问题等多视角出发,主要考虑2种情况:一是局部地区养殖业规模适中,养殖场产生的粪便可由本地土地消纳;二是养殖场规模大,粪便产生局部过量,超出当地农田消纳能力,则要考虑粪便的输出与营养去除。主要粪便处理技术包括酸化、固液分离、堆肥、厌氧消化、好氧生物处理、真空蒸发浓缩、热干燥、氨转化利用、过滤与反渗透、植物净化等。

Abstract

This paper discussed animal manure management strategies and technologies in Europe. The strategies were determined mainly by the development of local animal husbandry and environmental and economic factors. Two situations were discussed: one was that the manure generated by local breeding farms could be applied locally when the scale of animal husbandry was moderate; the other was that the manure produced by local breeding farms exceeded local land carrying capacity. Under the second situation, how to deal with the exceeded manure and remove the nutrients should be considered. Main manure treatment technologies applied in Europe included acidification, solid-liquid separation, composting, anaerobic digestion, aerobic biological treatment, concentration by vacuum evaporation, thermal drying, ammonia stripping and absorption, filtration and reverse osmosis, plant purification, etc.

关键词

畜禽养殖 / 畜禽粪便 / 土地消纳 / 粪便处理技术 / 粪便管理策略

Key words

animal husbandry / animal manure / land spreading / animal manure treatment technology / animal manure management strategy

引用本文

导出引用
郭常莲 , 李永平 , 汤昀 , 朱教宁 , 庞震鹏. 欧洲畜禽粪便的管理策略与技术. 中国农学通报. 2023, 39(5): 135-141 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0142
GUO Changlian , LI Yongping , TANG Yun , ZHU Jiaoning , PANG Zhenpeng. Management Strategy and Technology of Animal Manure in Europe. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2023, 39(5): 135-141 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0142

参考文献

[1]
BERNAL M P, BESCÓS B, BONMATÍ A, et al. Evaluation of manure management systems in Europe[R]. 2015.10,LIFE09 ENV/ES/000453 (www.lifemanev.eu).
[2]
HOU Y, VELTHOF G L, LESSCHEN J P, et al. Nutrient Recovery and Emissions of Ammonia, Nitrous Oxide, and Methane from Animal Manure in Europe:Effects of Manure Treatment Technologies[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2017, 51(1):375-383.
[3]
张朋月, 丁京涛, 孟海波, 等. 牛粪水酸化贮存过程中氮形态转化的特性研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(8):212-218.
[4]
王小彬, 闫湘, 李秀英. 畜禽粪污厌氧发酵沼液农用之环境安全风险[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(1):110-139
[5]
PEXAS G, MACKENZIE S, WALLACE M, et al. Environmental impacts of housing conditions and manure management in European pig production systems through a life cycle perspective: A case study in Denmark[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 253:120005. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120005).
[6]
闫杰, BUISONJÉ F E D E, MELSE R W. 白皮书—荷兰经验对中国畜禽粪便治理的启发. 2017, 报告编号:1049(https://doi.org/10.18174/423982).
[7]
王淑彬, 王明利, 等. 种养结合农业系统在欧美发达国家的实践及对中国的启示[J]. 世界农业, 2020(3): 92-98.
[8]
WORLD B G. Manure Management: An Overview and Assessment of Policy Instruments in the Netherlands[R]. 2017(www.worldbank.org.
[9]
BANGALORE M, HOCHMAN G, ZILBERMAN D. Policy incentives and adoption of agricultural anaerobic digestion: A survey of Europe and the United States[J]. Renewable energy, 2016, 97(11):559-571.
[10]
JOEL E, MAAZUZA O, STEWART B. A review of policy drivers and barriers for the use of anaerobic digestion in Europe, the United States and Australia[J]. Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, 2015, 52(10):815-828.
[11]
陈子爱, 邓良伟, 王超, 等. 欧洲沼气工程补贴政策概览[J]. 中国沼气, 2013, 31(6):29-34.
[12]
莫际仙, 高春雨, 毕于运. 国外养分管理计划政策与启示[J]. 世界农业, 2018, 06(总470):86-93.
[13]
BANKS C, SALTER A, MICHAEL C. Potential of anaerobic digestion for mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and production of renewable energy from agriculture: barriers and incentives to widespread adoption in Europe[J]. Water science & technology, 2007, 55(10):165-173.
[14]
PEXAS G, MACKENZIE S, WALLACE M, et al. Environmental impacts of housing conditions and manure management in European pig production systems through a life cycle perspective: A case study in Denmark[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2020, 253(4): N.PAG-N.PAG.
[15]
FLOTATS X, FOGED H L, BONMATÍ A, et al. Manure Processing Technologies. In: Technical Report No.II Concerning “Manure Processing Activities in Europe” to the European Commission. Directorate-General Environment, 2011:184.
[16]
MILLER F, METTING F B. Composting as a process based on the control of ecologically selective factors. Soil Microbial Ecology. Applications in agricultural and environmental management. NewYork,Marcel Dekker,Inc., 1992:515-544.
[17]
GAJALAKSHMI S, ABBASI S A. Solid waste management by composting: State of the art[J]. Critical reviews in environmental science and technology, 2008, 38:311-400.
[18]
BERNAL M. Compost: Production, Use and Impact on Carbon and Nitrogen Cycles[D]. International Fertiliser Society,York,UK, 2008:631.
[19]
邓亚琴, 王宇蕴, 李兰, 等. 云南省畜禽粪污土地消纳能力的评估及其肥料化发展前景[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2021, 40(11):2419-2427.
[20]
焦敏娜, 任秀娜, 何熠锋, 等. 畜禽粪污清洁堆肥——机遇与挑战[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2021, 40(11):2361-2371.
[21]
ACHINAS S, EUVERINK G J W. Rambling facets of manure-based biogas production in Europe: A briefing[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2020, 119:109566.
[22]
党锋, 毕于运, 刘研萍, 等. 欧洲大中型沼气工程现状分析及对我国的启示[J]. 中国沼气, 2014, 32(1): 79-83.
[23]
FOGED H L, FLOTATS X, BONMATI B A, et al. Assessment of economic feasibility and environmental performance of manure processing technologies.T echnical Report No.IVconcerning“Manure Processing Activities in Europe”to the European Commission,Directorate- General Environment. Project reference: ENV.B.1,ETU, 2010(7):130.
[24]
梁丽芬, 叶泉清, 陈静, 等. 提高畜禽粪便沼气发酵产气量的研究进展[J]. 四川环境, 2021, 40(2):254-258.
[25]
曾静, 尹芳, 张无敌, 等. 添加蛭石对奶牛粪厌氧干发酵的影响[J]. 中国沼气, 2021, 39(4):33-38.
[26]
邱美珍, 谢菊兰, 张星, 等. 畜禽粪污资源化利用中生物转化技术研究进展[J]. 湖南畜牧兽医, 2020,(5):19-21.
[27]
FONT-PALMA CAROLINA. Methods for the Treatment of Cattle Manure—A Review[J]. Journal of Carbon Research,2019-5-27.
[28]
张静妮, 韩志刚, 郑丹, 等. 畜禽养殖废水处理动态与发展趋势[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2021, 40(11):2320-2329
[29]
FINZI A, MATTACHINI G, LOVARELLI D, et al. Technical, Economic, and Environmental Assessment of a Collective Integrated Treatment System for Energy Recovery and Nutrient Removal from Livestock Manure[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(7):2756.
[30]
GIUNTOLI J, AGOSTINI A, EDWARDS R, et al. Solids and gaseous bioenergy pathways: input values and GHG emissions. 2015, Report EUR 27215 pag.14-ISBN 978-92-79-47895-6 (PDF)-ISSN 1831-9424.
[31]
LAURENI M, PALATSI J, LLOVERA M, et al. Influence of pig slurry characteristics on ammonia stripping efficiencies and quality of the recovered ammonium-sulfate solution[J]. Chem technol biotechnol, 2013(88): 1654-1662.
[32]
WEBB J, SØRENSEN P, VELTHOF G, et al. An Assessment of the Variation of Manure Nitrogen Efficiency throughout Europe and an Appraisal of Means to Increase Manure-N Efficiency[J]. Advances in agronomy, 2013, 119(1):371-442.

基金

山西农业大学学术恢复科研专项(2020xshf77)
PDF(1201 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/