The aim is to verify the reasons of Zizyphus jujube (Chinese jujube tree) volatiles attracting Asias halodendri. The electroantennogram and olfactory behavioral responses of A. halodendri to six volatiles from Chinese jujube tree were tested with the electroantennogram (EAG) and Y-tube olfactometer, respectively. The results showed that the six compound chemicals emanating from Z. jujube could induce obvious EAG responses of male and female beetles. A. halodendri had the highest EAG relative value to the six compound chemicals when the concentration of stimulation got to 100 μg/μL. The EAG responses value of male and female A. halodendri to n-hendecane was the highest, being 2.34 and 2.29, respectively. As for olfactory behavioral response tests, the male and female beetles were attracted by n-hendecane and cis-3-hexenyl acetate. The research could provide a theoretical basis for developing botanical attractants to A. halodendri.
Yan Xiongfei,Liu Yonghua,Li Gang,He Ying,Liu Xiaoying and Liu Lie.
EAGand Olfactory Behavioral Responses of Asias halodendri to Six Volatiles from Chinese Jujube Tree. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2016, 32(36): 177-181 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16090142
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 郭峪新,单公华.中国枣(第二版)[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2010:11-68.
[2] 刘长海,阎锡海,王延峰,等.陕北枣区发现红缘天牛危害枣树[J].植物保护,2002,28(6):58.
[3] 刘艳萍,刘耀兰,刘雅娟.陕北枣树病虫害防治技术的探讨[J].陕西林业科技,2009,12(5),31-34.
[4] 刘菲.红缘天牛的生物学特性和综合防控对策[J].河北林业科技,2012,6(6):76-77.
[5] 戴建青,韩诗畴,杜家纬.植物挥发性信息化学物质在昆虫寄主选择行为中的作用[J].环境昆虫学报,2010,32(3):407-414.
[6] 史胜青,雷静品,胡永健,等.树木挥发物及其抗虫作用研究进展[J].华北农学报,2010,25(增刊):295-300.
[7] 阎凤鸣.化学生态学(第二版)[M].北京:科学出版社,2011:44-85.
[8] 王广利,迟德富.天牛化学通讯及其在害虫综合治理中的应用[J].林业科学,2007,43(9):88-94.
[9] 诸葛飘飘.杨树云斑天牛成虫寄主定位中的信息化合物质[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2009.
[10] 张燕如.柠条绿虎天牛的寄主选择机制[D].北京:北京林业大学,2015.
[11] 阎雄飞,刘博,刘永华,等.植食性昆虫寄主识别的化学感受分子机理[J].榆林学院校报,2013,23(2):5-10.
[12] 魏丹,秦勤,寻锋,等.红缘天牛对不同诱剂的EAG与行为反应及野外诱集效果[J].天津师范大学学报,2012,32(3):71-75.
[13] 丁嘉文,刘强,朱耿平,等.红缘天牛对沙枣花中8种化合物的EAG及行为反应[J].天津师范大学学报,2014,34(2):71-75
[14] 曹丽娟,刘强,朱耿平,等.红缘天牛对沙棘7种挥发物的EAG和嗅觉行为反应[J].天津师范大学学报,2015,35(3):84-88.
[15] 张嫣,刘强.红缘天牛对杏树挥发物的生理和行为反应[J].环境昆虫学报,2016,38(2):384-392.
[16] Hanks, L M. Influence of the larval host plant on reproductive strategies of cerambycid beetles[J].Annual Review of Entomology,1999,44(1):483-505.
[17] 王保新,杨桦,杨伟,等.云斑天牛对10种植物挥发物的EAG和行为反应[J].应用昆虫学报,2014,51(2):481-489.
[18] 黄翠虹,李静静,周琳,等.昆虫触角电位(EAG)及其与气谱联用(GC-EAD)技术[J].应用昆虫学报,2014,51(2):579-585.
[19] 阎雄飞,李善才.枣食芽象甲对不同品种枣树挥发物气味行为反应[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(22):197-200.
[20] 韩颖,李新岗,杨立军,等.枣树不同发育期挥发物研究[J].西北林学院学报,2010,25(5):170-175.
[21] 李为争,胡晶晶,陈汉杰,等.挥发性植物源害虫引诱剂筛选与混配方法的新视角[J].应用昆虫学报,2015,52(5):1094-1106.
[22] 王茹淋,杨伟,杨春平,等.华山松大小蠹对几种寄主挥发物组分的EAG和行为反应[J].生物学杂志,2011,30(4):724-729.
[23] 张嫣,刘强,朱耿平,等.槐绿虎天牛对葡萄和杏11种挥发物的EAG及行为反应[J].应用昆虫学报,2015,52(5):1113-1122.
[24] 樊慧,金幼菊,李继泉,等.引诱植食性昆虫的植物挥发性信息化合物的研究进展[J].北京林业大学学报,2004,26(3):76-81.
[25] 杨桦,杨茂发,杨伟,等.竹横锥大象对寄主及虫体挥发物的行为和触角电位反应[J].昆虫学报,2010,53(3):286-292.
[26] 肖方叔,刘强.红缘天牛嗅觉感受器的类型及特点[J].应用昆虫学报,2011,48(3):680-687.