本研究旨在比较CTAB法、改良CTAB法、SDS法、氯化苄法和Chelex-100 法提取真菌DNA作为PCR模板的效果，以生长速率、菌落形态差异较大的11 个煤污病菌属真菌为研究对象，以核糖体RNA(rRNA)基因中的内转录间隔区(ITS)序列和28S rRNA基因部分序列的扩增率为指标，采用SPSS软件对结果进行方差分析。结果表明，CTAB法和改良CTAB法适用真菌范围最广，分别有7 个和9 个属真菌的扩增率都大于70%且无显著性差异；氯化苄法和Chelex-100 法适用范围居中，分别有6 个和8 个属真菌的扩增率较高且无显著性差异，扩增率分别大于70%和50%；SDS法适用范围最窄，有6 个属真菌的扩增率高于50%且无显著性差异。大多数煤污病菌至少有2 种及以上的DNA提取方法能够取得较好的效果，但链丝孢属真菌只有用氯化苄法提取DNA效果最好。采用改良CTAB法结合氯化苄法，能够满足所有供试煤污病菌类群真菌提取基因组DNA用作PCR反应模板的需要。
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare the effect of fungal genomic DNA, which was extracted by five methods including CTAB method, modified CTAB method, SDS method, benzyl chloride method and Chelex-100 method, as PCR templates. Eleven sooty blotch and flyspeck (SBFS) fungal genera that exhibited different growth rates and colony characters were selected as tested fungi, and amplification percentages of PCR reactions of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) and partial sequences of 28S rRNA gene of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) were used as indexes, and the results were analyzed with SPSS software. The results showed that the CTAB method and the modified CTAB method were suitable for most fungi, respectively with seven and nine tested fungal genera amplification percentage higher than 70% and had no significant differences. The benzyl chloride method and the Chelex-100 method were suitable for partial fungi, respectively with six and eight tested fungal genera amplification percentage higher than 70% and 50%, and had no significant differences. The SDS method was suitable for only a narrow range of fungi, with six tested fungal genera amplification percentage higher than 50% and had no significant differences. There were at least two methods that could perform well to extract DNA from most SBFS fungal genera, but only the benzyl chloride method gave the best DNA extraction result for the genus Scleroramularia. Using modified CTAB method combined with the benzyl chloride method could meet the need of extracting SBFS fungal genomic DNA as PCR templates.
关键词
DNA提取,煤污病菌,CTAB,SDS,氯化苄,Chelex-100
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
DNA extraction; sooty blotch and flyspeck fungi; CTAB; SDS; benzyl chloride; Chelex-100
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 魏江春. 菌物生物多样性与人类可持续发展. 中国科学院院刊, 2010, 25(6): 645-650.
[2] 魏江春. 菌物生物多样性及其资源研发前景. 菌物研究, 2012, 10(3): 125-129.
[3] 孙广宇, 彭友良, 李振歧, 等. 核苷酸序列分析在真菌系统学研究中的应用. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 31(6): 187-192.
[4] 吴志红, 汪天虹, 黄卫, 等. 简便易行的丝状真菌染色体DNA提取法. 菌物系统, 2001, 20(4): 575-577.
[5] 吴发红, 黄东益, 黄小龙, 等. 几种真菌DNA提取方法的比较. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(8): 62-64.
[6] 朱衡, 瞿峰, 朱立煌. 利用氯化苄提取适于分子生物学分析的真菌 DNA. 真菌学报, 1994, 13(1): 34-40.
[7] 孙立夫, 张艳华, 裴克全. 一种高效提取真菌总DNA的方法. 菌物学报, 2009, 28(2): 299-302.
[8] 潘力, 崔翠, 王斌. 一种用于PCR扩增的丝状真菌DNA快速提取方法. 微生物学通报, 2010, 37(3): 450-453.
[9] 陈吉良, 黄小龙, 吴安迪, 等. 一种快速高效提取病原真菌DNA作为PCR模板的方法. 菌物学报, 2011, 30(1): 147-149.
[10] Gleason ML, Batzer JC, Sun GY, et al. A new view of sooty blotch and flyspeck. Plant Disease, 2011, 95(4): 368-383.
[11] 冮洁, 杜连祥, 路福平, 等. 基因工程菌里氏木霉染色体DNA的提取方法. 生物技术, 2004, 14(2): 24-26.
[12] 张晓晖, 郭春华, 江晓霞, 等. 康氏木霉基因组DNA提取方法的比较研究. 生物技术通报, 2007(5): 128-130.
[13] 贺羽, 李鑫, 王有福, 等. 苹果球壳孢腐烂病菌DNA不同提取方法的比较. 江苏农业科学, 2012, 40(6): 38-40.
[14] 程国旺, 吴中华, 徐剑, 等. 高山被孢霉DNA提取方法的比较与改进. 安徽农业大学学报, 2004, 31(2): 203-206.
[15] 孙仲桂, 曹远银, 韩建东, 等. 小麦秆锈菌夏孢子DNA提取方法的比较研究. 湖北农业科学, 2010, 49(6): 1281-1284.
[16] 韩冰, 蔺瑞明, 曹远银, 等. 小麦条锈菌DNA提取方法的比较研究. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(4): 81-83.
[17] 张宝俊, 李志岗, 张家榕, 等. 4种镰刀菌基因组DNA提取方法的比较研究. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 38(31): 13559-13560, 13563.
[18] 韩峰, 李凤兰, 李学湛, 等. 马铃薯干腐病主要致病菌DNA提取方法比较. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(1): 209-213.
[19] 白永宏, 陈国梁, 闫冬, 等. 几种食用菌子实体总DNA提取方法的比较研究. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(19): 11409-11410.
[20] 李亚菲, 何鸿举, 吕茜, 等. 扩展青霉基因组DNA五种提取方法比较. 北方园艺, 2011(20): 128-131.
[21] 崔丽霞, 韩建荣. 青霉DNA提取方法比较研究. 山西大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 27(2):185-187.
[22] 谢放, 陈京津, 朱子雄. 三种提取冬虫夏草菌丝体基因组DNA方法的比较. 生物技术通报, 2010(8): 134-136.
[23] 安鑫龙, 董金皋, 韩建民. 玉米大斑病菌的RAPD分析I. 应用CTAB法提取玉米大斑病菌DNA. 河北农业大学学报, 2001, 24(1): 38-41.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
PDF(1699 KB)
