采用3 种模型对光响应曲线进行拟合,比较不同拟合模型的优劣,旨在优选出水分胁迫下最优的光合作用光响应模型,为深入了解扭黄茅光合生理生态特征、合理使用水资源有效地进行植被恢复提供科学依据。利用Li-6400 光合仪测定了元谋干热河谷扭黄茅雨季在不同土壤水分胁迫程度下光合作用的光响应过程,并用直角双曲线模型、非直角双曲线模型和直角双曲线修正模型对光响应曲线进行拟合,通过决定系数(R2)、拟合的初始量子效率(α)、最大净光合速率(Pnmax)、光饱和点(LSP)、光补偿点(LCP)和暗呼吸速率(Rd) 6 个参数的对比,比较3 种模型的差异。研究结果表明:(1)随着土壤水分胁迫的加重,扭黄茅净光合速率、光补偿点、暗呼吸速率降低,强光下扭黄茅的光合作用发生光抑制现象,表现为光合速率随光合有效辐射强度的增加而呈现先升高后降低的趋势;(2)从决定系数比较来看,拟合效果优劣排序为直角双曲线修正模型>非直角双曲线模型>直角双曲线模型;(3)直角双曲线修正模型的Pnmax、LSP、LCP 和Rd 4 个光合参数均与实测值较为接近,而其他模型除个别参数较为接近外,多数参数差别较大。直角双曲线修正模型可以直接得出饱和光强和最大净光合速率,能够较好地拟合土壤水分胁迫下扭黄茅的光响应过程及其特征参数,拟合值较符合植物实际的生理情况,更接近实测值,该模型可以更好地拟合土壤水分胁迫下扭黄茅的光响应曲线。
Abstract
In order to find out the optimum light response model of photosynthesis, compare the advantages and disadvantages of different models, understand physiological ecology characteristics of photosynthesis of Paspalum notatum and reasonably use water resource to conduct vegetation recovery, three light response models were used to simulate light response. Light response process of photosynthesis was studied by Li-6400 photosynthesis system under different soil water stresses in rainy season in Yuanmou dry-hot valley, light response curve was simulated by rectangular hyperbola model, non-rectangular hyperbola model and modified rectangular hyperbola model, respectively. The difference of the three models was analyzed by determination coefficient (R2), simulated initial quantum efficiency (α), the maximum net photosynthetic rate (Pnmax), light saturation point (LSP), light compensation point (LCP) and dark respiration rate (Rd). The results showed that (1) Pnmax, LCP and Rd of Heteropogon contortus decreased with the increase of water stress, light suppression phenomenon happened under strong light situation, photosynthetic (Pn) increased and then decreased with the increase of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR); (2) according to R2, the simulation results followed the order of modified rectangular hyperbola model > non-rectangular hyperbola model > rectangular hyperbola model; (3) the four parameters of Pnmax, LSP, LCP and Rd were close to the measured values in rectangular hyperbola model, while most of the parameters of other models had obvious differences from the measured values except individual parameters. Modified rectangular hyperbola model could get saturated light intensity and Pnmax directly, and well fit the light response process and characteristic parameters, the simulated values could meet the actual physiology condition and the measured values, thus this model could simulate the light response characteristics of photosynthesis of Paspalum notatum under water stress.
关键词
扭黄茅;土壤水分胁迫;光合作用光响应;光响应模型
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
Heteropogon contortus; soil water stress; light response of photosynthesis; light response model
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 蒋高明, 常杰, 高玉葆,等. 植物生理生态学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社,2004: 73.
[2] 郎莹, 张光灿, 张征坤,等. 不同土壤水分下山杏光合作用光响应过程及其模拟[J]. 生态学报,2011,31(16): 4499-4508.
[3] 陈志成, 王荣荣, 王志伟,等. 不同土壤水分条件下栾树光合作用的光响应[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2012,10(3): 105-110.
[4] 彭素琴, 刘郁林. 不同品种金银花光合作用对干旱胁迫的响应[J].北方园艺,2010(19): 191-193.
[5] 夏江宝, 张光灿, 刘刚,等. 不同土壤水分条件下紫藤叶片生理参数的光响应[J]. 应用生态学报,2007, 18(1): 30-34.
[6] 韩刚, 赵忠. 不同土壤水分下4种沙生灌木的光合光响应特性[J].生态学报,2010,30(15): 4019-4026.
[7] 卢琼琼,宋新山,严登华. 干旱胁迫对大豆苗期光合生理特性的影响[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(9): 42-47.
[8] 何斌, 刘勇. 水分胁迫对异株荨麻光响应特性的影响[J].吉林农业大学学报,2012,34(2): 25-129.
[9] Long SP, Bernacchi CJ. Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error. Journal of Experimental Botany,2003,54(392): 2393-2401.
[10] 李倩, 王明, 王雯雯,等. 华山新麦草光合特性对干旱胁迫的响应[J].生态学报,2012,32(13): 4278-4284.
[11] 罗大庆, 郭其强, 王贞红,等. 西藏半干旱区3种柏树对干旱胁迫的生理响应特征[J].西北植物学报2011,31(8): 1611-1617.
[12] 叶子飘, 李进省. 光合作用对光响应的直角双曲线修正模型和非直角双曲线模型的对比研究[J].井冈山大学学报(自然科学版),2010,31(3): 38-44.
[13] 叶子飘. 光响应模型在超级杂交稻组合-Ⅱ优明86中的应用[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(8): 1323-1326.
[14] Ye ZP. A new model for relationship between irradiance and the rate of photosynthesis in Oryza sativa[J]. Photosynthetica,2007,45(4): 637-640.
[15] 叶子飘, 于强. 一个光合作用光响应新模型与传统模型的比较[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2007,38(6): 771-775.
[16] 叶子飘, 康华靖. 植物光响应修正模型中系数的生物学意义研究[J].扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2012,33(2): 51-57.
[17] 朱永宁, 张玉书, 纪瑞鹏,等. 干旱胁迫下3种玉米光响应曲线模型的比较[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2012,43(1): 3-7.
[18] Kulhari PK, Katewa SS. Effect of nitrogen with different sources on the productivity and quality of natural grasslands of Udaipur valley[J].Forage Research,1998,24(2): 91-92.
[19] Trivedi BK. Management strategies of Sehima-Heteropogon grasslands for forage production[J].Range Management and Agroforestry,1997,18(1): 1-10.
[20] Singh PK, Kumari PK, Pandey DD. Biomass and primary productivity of grassland of Chhotanagpur Plateau, Bihar[J].Environment and Ecology,1999,17(3): 696-700.
[21] 张映翠. 乡土草本植物对干热河谷退化土壤修复的生态效应及机制研究[D]. 重庆:西南农业大学,2005.
[22] Hendricksen RE, Myles DJ, Reid DJ, et al. Impacts of grazing management options on pasture and animal productivity in a Heteropogon contortus (black speargrass) pasture in central Queensland. 3. Diet composition in autumn[J].Animal Production Science,2010,50(4): 276-283.
[23] Burrows WH, Orr DM, Hendricksen RE, et al. Impacts of grazing management options on pasture and animal productivity in a Heteropogon contortus (black speargrass) pasture in central Queensland. 4. Animal production[J].Animal Production Science,2010,50(4): 284-292.
[24] Orr DM, Yee MC, Rutherford MT, et al. Impacts of grazing management options on pasture and animal productivity in a Heteropogon contortus (black speargrass) pasture in central Queensland. 2. Population dynamics of Heteropogon contortus and Stylosanthes scabra cv. Seca[J].Crop & Pasture Science,2010,61(3): 255-267.
[25] Rakotoarimanana V, Grouzis M, Le Floc'h E. Effects of Fire and Grazing on Grass Phytomass Evolution in a Heteropogon contortus Savanna (Sakaraha Region, South West Madagascar)[J].Tropicultura,2008,26(1): 56-60.
[26] 王海宁, 严乃胜, 黄东月,等. 不同收获期的扭黄茅种子和植株抗旱性分析[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2010,25(4): 500-505.
[27] 叶子飘, 王建林. 植物光合-光响应模型的比较分析[J].井冈山学院学报,2009,30(4): 9-13.
[28] 张力文, 钟国成, 张利,等. 3种鼠尾草属植物光合作用-光响应特性研究[J].草业学报,2012,21(2): 70-76.
[29] 李合生. 现代植物生理学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社,2002. 130-131.
[30] 叶子飘, 于强. 光合作用光响应模型的比较[J].植物生态学报,2008,32(6): 1356-1361.
[31] 钱莲文, 张新时, 杨智杰,等. 几种光合作用光响应典型模型的比较研究[J].武汉植物学研究,2009,27(2): 197-203.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}