花生连作障碍与根系分泌物自毒作用的研究进展

刘娟,张俊,臧秀旺,汤丰收,董文召,苗利娟,徐静,张忠信

中国农学通报. 2015, 31(30): 101-105

PDF(1290 KB)
PDF(1290 KB)
中国农学通报 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (30) : 101-105. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15040100
农学 农业基础科学

花生连作障碍与根系分泌物自毒作用的研究进展

  • 刘娟,张俊,臧秀旺,汤丰收,董文召,苗利娟,徐静,张忠信
作者信息 +

Research Advances in Continuous Cropping Obstacles and Root Exudates Autotoxicity of Peanut

  • Liu Juan, Zhang Jun, Zang Xiuwang, Tang Fengshou, Dong Wenzhao, Miao Lijuan, Xu Jing, Zhang Zhongxin
Author information +
History +

摘要

中国花生主产区的连作面积较大，连作障碍已成为影响花生产量的重要因素之一。目前，化感作用研究已成为揭示连作障碍机制的热点。本研究系统综述了连作对花生生育、产量、品质、营养吸收、生理特性和病害的影响；介绍了植物化感自毒作用与根系分泌物的概念，以及根系分泌物对花生生育的影响；总结了缓解花生连作障碍的措施包括合理轮作、土壤灭菌、添加有益微生物或营养元素以及采用综合措施等。并对花生连作障碍相关研究中的热点问题进行了探讨，以期为指导中国花生生产，实现花生生产的可持续发展提供理论和技术支持。

Abstract

China has a large area of continuous cropping of peanut production, and continuous cropping obstacle has become one of the important factors affecting the yield of peanut. At present, the study of allelopathy has become a hot topic to reveal the continuous cropping obstacle mechanism. This paper systematically summarized the effect of continuous cropping on peanut growth, yield, quality, nutrient uptake, physiological characteristics and disease. The concept of allelopathic autotoxicity and root exudates, and the influence of root exudates on peanut growth and development were introduced. The abatement measures of peanut continuous cropping obstacles were summarized including rational crop rotation, soil sterilization, beneficial microorganisms or nutrient elements supply, and the application of comprehensive measures. The hot research topics of peanut continuous cropping obstacles were discussed in order to guide Chinese peanut production and provide theoretical and technical support for sustainable development of peanut production.

关键词

花生；连作障碍；根系分泌物；自毒作用；消减措施

Key words

peanut; continuous cropping obstacles; root exudates; autotoxicity; abatement measures

引用本文

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

导出引用
刘娟,张俊,臧秀旺,汤丰收,董文召,苗利娟,徐静,张忠信. 花生连作障碍与根系分泌物自毒作用的研究进展. 中国农学通报. 2015, 31(30): 101-105 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15040100
Liu Juan,Zhang Jun,Zang Xiuwang,Tang Fengshou,Dong Wenzhao,Miao Lijuan,Xu Jing and Zhang Zhongxin. Research Advances in Continuous Cropping Obstacles and Root Exudates Autotoxicity of Peanut. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2015, 31(30): 101-105 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15040100

参考文献

[1] Chen M N, Li X, Yang Q L. et al. Soil eukaryotic microorganism succession as affected by continuous cropping of peanut--pathogenic and beneficial fungi were selected[J]. PLoS ONE, 2012,7(7): e40659.
[2] Liu P, Wan S B, Jiang L H , et al. Autotoxic potential of root exudates of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)[J]. Allelopathy Journal, 2010, 26(2):197-206.
[3] 高群,孟宪志,于洪飞.连作障碍原因分析及防治途径研究[J].山东农业科学,2006(3):60-63.
[4] Asao T, Hasegawa K, Sueda Y, et al. Autotoxicity of root exudates from taro[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2003, 97(3/4):389-396.
[5] Inderjit I. Soil microorganisms: an important determinant of allelopathic activity[J]. Plant and Soil, 2005, 274(1/2): 227-236.
[6] 何志鸿,刘忠堂,许艳丽,等.大豆重迎茬减产的原因及农艺对策研究——重迎茬大豆减产的主要原因[J].黑龙江农业科学,2003(2):1-4.
[7] 许艳丽,王光华,韩晓增,等.连作大豆生物障碍研究[J].中国油料,1997,19(3):46-49.
[8] 何志鸿,刘忠堂,胡立成,等.大豆重迎茬减产的主要原因及农艺对策[J].大豆通报,1998(3):4-5.
[9] Yu J Q, Matsui Y. Phytotoxic substances in root exudates of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1994, 20:21-31.
[10] Yu J Q, Masui Y H. Effects of root exudates of cucumber and allelochemicals on ion uptake by cucumber seedling[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1997(23): 817-827.
[11] 郭冠瑛,王丰青,范华敏,等.地黄化感自毒作用与连作障碍机制的研究进展[J].中国现代中药,2012,14(6):35-39.
[12] 陈慧,郝慧荣,熊君,等.地黄连作对根际微生物区系及土壤酶活性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(12):2755-2759.
[13] 张重义,尹文佳,李娟,等.地黄连作的生理生态特性[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(5):547-554.
[14] 郭利川,刘常宏,左广胜,等.地黄连作障碍机制分析[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(31):227-230.
[15] 黄玉茜,韩立思,韩梅,等.花生连作对土壤酶活性的影响[J].中国油料作物学报,2012,34(1):96-100.
[16] 徐瑞富,王小龙.花生连作田土壤微生物群落动态与土壤养分关系研究[J].花生学报,2003,32(3):19-24.
[17] 封海胜,张思苏,万书波,等.土壤微生物与连、轮作花生的相互效应研究[J].莱阳农学院学报,1995,12(2):97-101.
[18] 崔瑞,李玉荣.花生重茬连作危害与合理轮作倒茬效果的调查研究[J].辽宁农业科学,2008(1):18-20.
[19] 曹爱东,秦庆红.花生连作重茬减产原因及增产措施[J].现代农业科技,2007(21):137-138.
[20] 孙秀山,封海胜,万书波,等.连作花生田主要微生物类群与土壤酶活性变化及其交互作用[J].作物学报,2001,27(5):617-621.
[21] 张思苏,封海胜,万书波,等.花生不同连作年限对植株生育的影响[J].花生科技,1992(2):21-23.
[22] 王明珠,陈学南.低丘红壤区花生连续高产的障碍及对策[J].花生学报,2005,34(2):17-22.
[23] 刘苹,赵海军,万书波,等.连作对花生根系分泌物化感作用的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2011,19(3):639?644.
[24] 吴正锋,成波,王才斌,等.连作对花生幼苗生理特性及荚果产量的影响[J].花生学报,2006,35(1):29-33.
[25] 王才斌,吴正锋,成波,等.连作对花生光合特性和活性氧代谢的影响[J].作物学报,2007,33(8):1304-1309.
[26] 甄志高,段莹,王晓林,等.花生连作对植株营养水平和光合生理指标的影响[J].陕西农业科学,2004(1):12-13.
[27] 刘美昌,郑亚萍,王才斌,等.连作对花生生育的影响及其缓解措施研究[J].中国农学通报,2006,22(9):144-148.
[28] Chen M N, Li X, Yang Q L, et al. Dynamic succession of soil bacterial community during continuous cropping of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(7): e101355.
[29] Li X G, Ding C F, Hua K, et al. Soil sickness of peanuts is attributable to modifications in soil microbes induced by peanut root exudates rather than to direct allelopathy[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2014(78):149-159.
[30] Yao H Y, Bowman D, Rufty T, et al. Interactions between N fertilization, grass clipping addition and pH in turf ecosystems: Implications for soil enzyme activities and organic matter decomposition[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2009,41(7):1425- 1432.
[31] He C N, Gao W W, Yang J X, et al. Identification of autotoxic compounds from fibrous roots of Panax quinquefolium L[J]. Plant and Soil, 2009, 318(1/2):63-72.
[32] 解文科,王小青,李斌,等.植物根系分泌物研究综述[J].山东林业科技,2005(5):63-67.
[33] 贺永华,沈东升,朱荫湄,等.根系分泌物及其根际效应[J].科技通报,2006,22(6):761-766.
[34] 涂书新,孙锦荷,郭智芬,等.植物根系分泌物与根际营养关系评述[J].土壤与环境,2000,9(1):64-67.
[35] Vancura V. Root exudates of plants[J]. Plant Soil, 1964, 21: 231-248.
[36] 陈龙池,廖利平,汪思龙,等.根系分泌物生态学研究[J].生态学杂志, 2002,21(6): 57-62.
[37] Bertin C, Yang X, Weston L A. The role of root exudates and allelochemicals in the rhizosphere[J]. Plant Soil,2003,256(1):67-83.
[38] Strobel B W. Influence of vegetation on low-molecular-weight carboxylic acids in soil solution[J]. Geoderma,2001,99(3-4):169-198.
[39] Rovira A D. Plant root exudates[J]. Botanical Reviews,1969, 35: 35-57.
[40] Baziramakenga R, Leroux G D, Simard R R. Effects of benzoic and cinnamic acids on membrane permeability of soybean roots[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1995,21(9):1271-1285.
[41] Zeng R S, Luo S M, Shi Y H, et al. Physiological and biochemical mechanism of allelopathy of secalonic acid F on higher plants[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2001,93(1):72-79.
[42] Tang C S, Young C C. Collection and identification of allelopathi compounds from the undisturbed root system of bigalta limpograss (Hemarthria altissima)[J]. Paint Physiology, 1982, 69(1):155-160.
[43] 孔祥丽,任新明.花生连作障碍的产生机理及防控措施研究[J].湖北农业科学,2011,50(10):1951-1953.
[44] 刘苹,赵海军,万书波,等.花生根系分泌物自毒作用研究[J].中国油料作物学报,2010,32(3):431-435.
[45] 刘苹,王梅,杨力,等.花生根系腐解物对根腐镰刀菌和固氮菌的化感作用研究[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(35):21701-21703.
[46] 刘苹,高新昊,孙明,等.3种酚酸类物质对花生发芽和土壤微生物的互作效应研究[J].江西农业学报,2012,24(8):85-87.
[47] 袁云云,咸洪泉,洪永聪,等.花生根系分泌物的鉴定及其化感效应分析[J].花生学报,2011,40(3):24-29.
[48] 王兴祥,张桃林,戴传超.连作花生土壤障碍原因及消除技术研究进展[J].土壤,2010,42(4):505-512.
[49] 李培栋,王兴祥,李奕林,等.连作花生土壤中酚酸类物质的检测及其对花生的化感作用[J].生态学报,2010,30(8):2128-2134.
[50] Kato-Noguchi H. Stress-induced allelopathic activity and momilactone B in rice[J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 2009, 59: 153-158.
[51] Zhou J, Kang L, Wang H W, et al. Liquid laccase production by Phomopsis liquidambari B3 accelerated phenolic acids degradation in long-term cropping soil of peanut[J]. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B -Soil & Plant Science, 2014, 64(8): 683-693.
[52] 封海胜,张思苏,万书波,等.解除花生连作障碍的对策研究.Ⅰ模拟轮作的增产效果[J].花生科技,1996(1):22-24.
[53] 郑亚萍,王才斌,黄顺之,等.花生连作障碍及其缓解措施研究进展[J].中国油料作物学报,2008,30(3):384-388.
[54] 何志刚,汪仁,王秀娟,等.花生自毒物质降解菌的筛选及其降解效果初步研究[J].中国农学通报,2014,(21):224-227.
[55] 封海胜,张思苏,万书波,等.解除花生连作障碍的对策研究Ⅲ.微生物调节剂的增产效果[J].花生科技,1996(3):13-16.
PDF(1290 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail
段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉