为了减轻稻瘟病为害损失,减少农药用量、残留、环境污染和防治成本,确保水稻和粮食生产、稻谷质量与贸易和农业生态环境安全。多年来,通过采用系统监测、定期调查、田间普查、品种抗稻瘟性鉴定、稻瘟病菌生理小种监测、试验示范和气象资料分析等方法,开展了南充市水稻稻瘟病综合防控技术研究。结果表明,生产用品种稻瘟病感病程度越高,大田偏重发生至重发生的概率越大,反之,则越小。3~5年更换一次具有不同抗源的主推品种,搞好品种布局,实现多抗源品种集团当家,能有效降低稻瘟病的流行程度。首次探明了杂糯间栽对稻瘟病的控制效果,搞好病稻草处理和播栽前越冬菌源处理,实施健身栽培,采取药剂浸种、药剂浸秧带药移栽等,可推迟、减轻稻瘟病发生为害。探明了稻瘟病防治时期和次数,尤其是偏重至大发生年颈瘟必须在破口至抽穗初期和齐穗期预防2次,否则,将造成严重损失。探明了75%三环唑(丰登)预防颈瘟的效果和适宜用量,4%春雷霉素、20%三环唑和1000亿个/g枯草芽孢杆菌对叶瘟和颈瘟的防治效果和差异显著性,2% 8亿个/g井冈·蜡芽菌、41%春雷·稻瘟灵3种处理和化学农药75%三环唑(对照药剂1)与40%稻瘟灵(对照药剂2)预防颈瘟的效果及评价。搞好防治示范片和应急防控,可以显著提高防治效果,并带动大面积防控落实。1997年以来,全市水稻稻瘟病中偏重至大发生频率达50.0%,通过应用综合防控技术措施,稻瘟病得到有效控制,其实际损失率均控制在2%以下,共计少用农药4523 t,2014年有44129.1 hm2水稻基地、32.7万t稻谷获得无公害、绿色和有机农产品认证,经济、社会和生态效益显著。
Abstract
The study aims to reduce blast damage and the use of pesticides residue, environment pollution and control costs, and to make a significant contribution to ensuring rice and grain production, grain quality and trade and agricultural ecological environment safety. Over these years, by the methods of systematical monitoring, regular surveys, field investigation, rice blast resistance identification, physiological sampling inspection of morbidity plant, experiment and meteorological data analysis, the study on comprehensive prevention and control technology of rice blast in Nanchong city was carried out. The results showed that the higher the degree of rice blast disease sensitivity, the heavier occurrence of the disease would be. Replacing the main varieties resistance sources each 3-5 years and a well-planned variety distribution would make multi resistance source be the group head which can effectively reduce the prevalence of rice blast. In the study we firstly discovered that rice variety mixture was good for preventing the rice blast. The measures such as straw treatment, overwintering pathogen source treatment before planting, health cultivation, soaking seed with medicine and planting with medicine can reduce the occurrence of rice blast. It was necessary to find out the prevention time and number of rice blast, especially in heavy occur year the prevention should be carried twice in the early break to heading time, otherwise, it would cause serious loss. The effect and appropriate dosage of 75% Tricyclazole (Fengdeng) was proved, and the prevention effect and significant difference of 4% kasugamycin, 20% Tricyclazole and 100 billion/g of Bacillus subtilis to leaf blast and neck blast were also proved. Meanwhile, the effect and evaluation of 2%·800 million/g Jinggangmycin- wax bud bacteria, 41% kasugamycin- isoprothiolane with 3 treatments, 5% Tricyclazole (contrast medicament1) and 40% isoprothiolane (contrast medicament2) to prevent neck blast were found out. Effective prevention and emergency prevention and control could significantly improve the control effect, and put the large area control into practice. Since 1997, the frequency of heavy occurrence reached to 50.0% in Nanchong city. Through the measures of comprehensive prevention and control technology, the rice blast was effectively controlled and the actual loss rate was controlled below 2% which reduced the application of pesticide of 4523 t in total. In 2014, 327000 t rice and 44129.1 hm2 of rice base gained pollution- free, green and organic agricultural products certification. The economic, social and ecological benefit was obvious.
关键词
水稻;稻瘟病;综合防控;技术
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
Rice; Rice blast; Comprehensive prevention and control; Technology
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 周光召.面向 21世纪的科技进步与社会经济发展[M].北京:中国科技出版社,1999:522.
[2] 孙国昌,杜新法,陶荣祥,等.水稻稻瘟病防治策略和 21世纪研究展望[J].植物病理学报,1998,28(4):289-292.
[3] 孙国昌,杜新法,陶荣祥,等.水稻稻瘟病防治研究进展和 21世纪初研究设想[J].植物保护,2000,26(1):33-35.
[4] 刘国权,孟昭河,任艳军,等.水稻稻瘟病研究进展与对策[J].中国农学通报,2002,20(1):211-214.
[5] 孙漱沅,孙国昌.我国稻瘟病研究的现状和展望[J].植保技术与推广,1996,16(3):39-40.
[6] 温小红,谢明杰,姜健,等.水稻稻瘟病防治方法研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2013,29(3):190-195.
[7] 熊春生,李曙胜,吴锋,等.首席风光——记中国农业大学教授彭友良.http://www.hb.xinhuanet.com/xsb/wuxue/tndb12.htm,新华网.
[8] 生物通.中国农大彭友良 《Plant Cell》 发表植物病理学新成果.http://www.ebiotrade.com/newsf/2014-3/2014320104905243.htm.
[9] 彭昌家.南充市水稻稻瘟病重发原因及综合防治研究[J].中国农学通报,2002,18(1):78-81.
[10] 杜晓宇,丁攀,陈晓娟,等.南充市水稻稻瘟病重发成因及治理对策[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(5):218-222.
[11] 夏敬源.公共植保、 绿色植保的发展与展望[J].中国植保导刊,2010,30(1):5-9.
[12] 谭家兴,张金瑜.稻瘟病流行与控制研究[J].西南农业大学学报(自然科学版),1999,21(1):7-9.
[13] 林正文.中国水稻病虫害综合防治策略与技术[M]北京:农业出版社,1991:197-206.
[14] 彭昌家,丁攀,白体坤,等.南充市主要粮油作物重大病虫害发生流行及灾变规律研究[J].安徽农学通报,2014(13):78-83.
[15] 赵学谦,廖华明.四川省利用水稻品种多样性间栽技术持续控制稻瘟病[J].西南农业学报,2006,19(3):418-422.
[16] 王平.水稻杂糯间栽对稻瘟病的控制作用及病菌种群结构的影响研究[D].成都:四川农业大学,2007.
[17] 樊江顺,文炳智,何海勇,等.杂糯间栽防治稻瘟病试验示范[J].贵州农业科学,2009,37(9):51-53.
[18] 张学博.药剂浸种对稻谷中稻瘟病菌消毒效果初报[J].福建农业科技,1983(2):20-21.
[19] 林荣寿,张武军,梁月清.三环唑浸秧防治稻叶瘟技术研究[J].植物保护学报,1989,16(3):211-215.
[20] 张金花,赫百令,韩润亭,等.75%三环唑可湿性粉剂发展稻瘟病药效评价[J].吉林农业科学,2010,35(4):41-42.
[21] 冯礼斌,白体坤,丁攀,等.川东北地区水稻全程绿色防控技术集成与效果评价[J].中国植保导刊,2013,33(10):47-50.
[22] 穆常青,潘玮,陆庆光,等.枯草眼胞杆菌对稻瘟病的防治效果评价及机制初探[J].中国生物防治,2006,22(2):158-160.
[23] 韦雪琼,黄汉能,贾雄兵.2%春雷霉素WP防治水稻稻瘟病的药效试验[J].广西植保,2006,19(4):15-16.
[24] 彭昌家.南充市植保专业化防治探索与实践[C]//吴孔明,公共植保与绿色防控——中国植保学会2010学术年会论文集.北京:中国农业出版社,2010:660-666.
[25] 梁江涛.女博士 “卤鸡论文” 为学术增添 “色香味” .http://pinglun.eastday.com/p/20141203/ulai8473614.htma.东方网.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}