从中国不同大麦产区选取12份代表性的品种(系),按NCⅡ设计配制成35个杂交组合,对7个主要农艺性状,株高、穗下节间长、穗长、单株穗数、每穗实粒数、单株粒重、千粒重的杂种优势与配合力进行了分析,旨在为杂交大麦育种的亲本选配提供依据。结果表明,不同性状的中亲优势表现不同,株高、穗下节间长、穗长、千粒重大多为正向优势组合,所占比例分别为90%、73.3%、73.3%、73.3%;单株穗数、每穗实粒数、单株粒重多呈负向优势,其中每穗实粒数负向优势组合所占比例高达76.7%。同一性状,不同亲本的一般配合力(GCA)不同,同一亲本,不同性状的GCA不同,组合间的特殊配合力(SCA)也是如此。GCA高的两亲本所配组合的SCA并非一定高,SCA是相对复杂的基因互作结果。因此,在杂交大麦育种的亲本选配上,应先考虑GCA高的亲本,在此基础上,筛选SCA高的组合。
Abstract
In order to provide a guideline in the selection of parents in hybrid barley breeding, twelve representative cultivars (lines) from different barley production areas in China were hybridized according to NCⅡ design to form 35 crosses to analyze the heterosis and combining ability of 7 agronomic traits including plant height (PH), internode length below spike (IL), spike length (SL), spikes per plant (SP), kernels per plant (KP), kernel weight per plant (KWP) and thousand kernel weight (TKW). The results indicated mid-parent heterosis (MPH) of F1 presented to be diverse in different traits. Positive heterotic crosses were obtained in the traits of PH, IL, SL and TKW, the proportion of which were 90%, 73.3%, 73.3% and 73.3%, respectively. More negative heterotic crosses appeared in the traits of SP, KP and KWP, and the highest proportion of 76.7% existed in the trait of KP. Different parents had different general combining ability (GCA) in the same trait and the GCA of one parent varied in different traits. The special combining ability (SCA) among crosses has the same result as to the variation of GCA. The SCA of a cross derived from two parents both with high GCA may not be high, and is the consequence of the interaction of genes. Therefore, primary consideration should be placed on parents with high GCA and cross with high SCA can be then screened.
关键词
大麦;农艺性状;中亲优势;配合力
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
barley; agronomic traits; mid-parent heterosis; combining ability
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 王辉,张宏军,吴险峰,等.作物杂种优势遗传研究进展[J].安徽农业大学学报,2010,37(1):15-21.
[2] 袁隆平.杂交水稻育种的新突破[ J].世界科技研究与发展,1999,21(2):29-30.
[3] 王权智,肖宇龙,王晓玲,等.水稻杂种优势利用的研究进展[J].江西农业学报,2013,25(6):23-28.
[4] 邵启全.大麦雄性不育性的遗传和亲本种间遗传距离关系的初探[A].中国大麦文集(第二集),1991:53-54.
[5] 李承道.大麦核质互作型雄性不育系自交和异交结实性的研究[A].中国大麦文集(第三集),1992:102-103.
[6] 张国荣,马俊虎,杜永芹,等.核质互作型大麦杂种优势研究初报[J].上海农业学报,1996,12(4):5-8.
[7] 许如根,吕超,祝丽,等.大麦杂种优势利用研究Ⅰ.F1杂种的离中亲优势和超优亲优势[J].作物学报,2004,30(7):668-674.
[8] 许如根,吕超,谬丽霞,等.大麦杂种优势利用研究Ⅲ.大麦异棱型和同棱型F1杂种的杂种优势特征[J].作物学报,2005,31(12):1537-1543.
[9] 张明生,张坚勇,蒋小平,等.大麦杂种优势利用研究的现状和趋势[J].江西农业学报,1998,10(4):81-85.
[10] 陈新宏,赵继新,刘淑会,等.普通小麦与大麦杂交研究进展[J].西北农业学报,2005,14(6):38-43.
[11] 张新忠,吕亮杰,吕超,等.大麦农艺性状与产量性状的杂种优势分析[J].麦类作物学报,2013,33(1):39-43.
[12] Tseng S T, Poshlman J M. Hybrid performance among six-rowed × two-rowed winter barleys (Hordeum vulgare L. and Hordeum distichum L.)[J]. Theor Appl Genet,1974(44):294-303.
[13] 刘维正.冬、春啤酒大麦杂种优势及亲子相关的初步研究[J].大麦科学,1993(4):3-6
[14] 史秀秀,毕晓静,马守才,等.黄淮麦区杂交小麦亲本的杂种优势和配合力分析[J].麦类作物学报,2013,33(6):1111-1118.
[15] 董育红,关周博,侯君利,等.春油菜区甘蓝型油菜含油量的杂种优势及配合力研究[J].西北农业学报,2014,23(4):40-44.
[16] 黄世容,陶采成.大麦几个经济性状的配合力与遗传力分析[J].湖北农业科学,2005(1):37-39
[17] Kim H S, Kim J G, Baek S B, et al. Estimation of genetic distance and its predictability of F1 hybrid performance in barley[J]. J. Crop Sci Biotech,2010,13(1):47-52.
[18] 许如根,黄志仁,吕超,等.大麦杂种优势与苗期酯酶同工酶的相关性研究[J].麦类作物,1999,19(6):35-38.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}