植物拮抗细菌及其在林木土传病害防治上的应用研究进展

鲍正宗 刘鹏 刘训理

中国农学通报. 2014, 30(19): 257-262

中国农学通报 ›› 2014, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (19) : 257-262. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2969
植物保护 农药

植物拮抗细菌及其在林木土传病害防治上的应用研究进展

  • 鲍正宗 刘鹏 刘训理
作者信息 +

Research in Plants Antagonistic Bacteria on the Soil-Borne Disease Control in the Forest

Author information +
History +

摘要

林木土传病害严重,防治难度大。拮抗细菌通过自身的代谢活动抑制病原菌的生长,可在林木根际或体内定殖,在防治土传病害方面潜力巨大。笔者从拮抗细菌及其种类、拮抗细菌的抑菌机制、拮抗细菌的定殖、在林木土传病害防治上的研究、应用及存在问题等进行了论述。

Abstract

Forest soil-borne diseases is serious, prevention is difficult. Antagonistic bacteria through its own metabolic activity inhibit the growth of pathogenic and it can be planted in the rhizosphere of forest trees or in vivo. There is great potential in control of soil-borne diseases. The article studied from the antagonistic bacteria and their species. The antibacterial mechanism, the planting and the forest soil-borne diseases control and the existing problems were discussed.

关键词

拮抗细菌; 生物防治; 定殖; 林木土传病害; 应用

Key words

antagonistic bacteria; biological control; colonizing; forestry soil-borne plant disease; application

引用本文

导出引用
鲍正宗 刘鹏 刘训理. 植物拮抗细菌及其在林木土传病害防治上的应用研究进展. 中国农学通报. 2014, 30(19): 257-262 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2969
Research in Plants Antagonistic Bacteria on the Soil-Borne Disease Control in the Forest. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2014, 30(19): 257-262 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2969

参考文献

从广东省各蔬菜基地采集101个表层土壤,测定土壤Olsen-P、Bray-P和CaCl2-P,以确定不同质地土壤的磷淋失临界值。结果表明,Olsen-P与CaCl2-P呈显著的线性关系,随着土壤Olsen-P的增加,CaCl2-P也呈现增加的趋势,存在1个明显的突变点,即土壤磷淋失临界值,壤质粘土的临界值为79.74 mg/kg,粘壤土的临界值为51.08 mg/kg,砂质粘壤土的淋失临界值为43.99 mg/kg,砂质壤土的淋失临界值为8.63 mg/kg,淋失临界值从高到低的顺序依次是:壤质粘土>粘壤土>砂质粘壤土>砂质壤土,与不同质地粘粒含量的表现规律一致。在砂质粘壤土上Bray-P与CaCl2-P呈显著的线性关系,但不存在明显的突变点,在壤质粘土、粘壤土和砂质壤土上,Bray-P与CaCl2-P未呈现显著的线性关系,不存在明显的突变点。因此,在本试验条件下,Olsen-P可以作为不同质地土壤磷淋失临界值指标。
[1] R. James Cook. Biological Control of Plant Pathogens: Theory to Application[J].Phytopathology,1985,75(1):25-29.
[2] Kloepper J W, Schroth M N. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria in Radish[A].Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria[C].GilbertClarey, Tours, France,1978: 879-882.
[3] 胡江春,薛德林,马成新.植物根际促生菌(PGPR)的研究与应用前景[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(10):1963-1966.
[4] Dworkin M, Foster J. Experiments with some microorganisms which utilize ethane and hydrogen[J].Bacteriol,1958(75):592-601.
[5] 陆雅海,张福锁.根际微生物研究进展[J].土壤,2006,38(2):113-121.
[6] Ownley B H, Benson D M. In: Trigiano R N, Windham M T, Windham A S, eds. Plant Pathology, Concepts and Laboratory Exercises (2nd ed)[M].Boca Raton, Florida, USA:CRC Press Inc., 2008:217-233.
[7] 李世东,缪作清,高卫东.我国农林园艺作物土传病害发生和防治现状及对策分析[J].中国生物防治学报,2011,27(4):433-440.
[8] 于淑池.拮抗细菌在生防领域的应用概述[J].承德职业学院学报, 2007,2:151-153.
[9] 陈志谊,张荣胜.植物病害生防芽孢杆菌研究进展[J].江苏农业学报,2012.28(5):999-1006.
[10] 郝晓娟.作物枯萎病生防细菌的研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2006:9.
[11] 胡桂萍,郑雪芳,尤,民等.植物内生菌的研究进展[J].福建农业学报, 2010,25(2):226-234.
[12] 石晶盈,陈维信,刘爱媛.植物内生菌及其防治植物病害的研究进展[J].生态学报,2006,26(7):2395-2401.
[13] 李长松.拮抗性细菌生物防治植物土传病害的研究进展[J].生物防治通报,1992,8(4):168-172.
[14] 郭荣君,刘杏忠,杨怀文.应用根际细菌防治植物寄生线虫的研究[J].中国生物防治,1996,12(3):134-137.
[15] 路宗岩.杉木炭疽病拮抗细菌的筛选及其菌剂研制[D].湖南:中南林业科技大学,2013:2-3.
[16] 朱玥妍,刘娇,杜春梅.芽孢杆菌生物防治植物病害研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2012,40(34):16635-16658.
[17] Hossain, Mohammad B. Inhibition of conidial growth of Venturia inaequalis by the extracellular protein fraction from the antagonistic bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens Bk3[J].Biological Control,2009,48(2):133-139.
[18] 陈宝如,詹儒林,何红,等.红树内生细菌AiL3菌株鉴定及其胞外抗菌活性物质特性[J].农业生物技术学报,2010,18(4):801-806.
[19] 徐刘平,尹燕妮,李师默,等.拮抗细菌对土传病原菌的作用机理[J].中国生物防治,2006,22(1):10-14.
[20] 潘朝勃,莫贱友,李其利,等.拮抗细菌对芒果炭疽病生物防治研究进展[J].南方农业科学学报,2013,44(4):602-606.
[21] 王光华,Jos M.Raaijmakers.生防细菌产生的拮抗物质及其在生物防治中的作用[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(6):1100-1104.
[22] Kanchalee Jetiyanona, Joseph W Kloepperb. Mixtures of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for induction of systemic resistance against multiple plant diseases[J].Biological Control,2002,24(3): 285-291.
[23] Baker R. Diversity in biological control[J].Crop Protection,1991 (10):85-94.
[24] Blakeman J P. Microbial competition for nutrients and germination of fungal spores[J].Ann App Biol,1978,89:151-155.
[25] 杨秀荣,刘水芳,孙淑琴.生防细菌防治土传病害的研究进展[J].天津农业科学,2008,14(4):38-42.
[26] Ryals Neuenschwander, Willits, et al. Systemic acquired resistance [J].Plant Cell,1996,8:1887-1899.
[27] Martin, Ian, Baldwin. Fitness costs of induced resistance: emerging experimental support for a slippery concept[J].Trends in Plant Science,2002(2):31.
[28] 李钠钾.苯并噻二唑(BTH)处理烟苗对普通花叶病诱导抗性研究[D].河南:河南农业大学,2011:1-7.
[29] Benizri E, Baudoin E, Guckert A. Root Colonization by Inoculated Plant Growth- Promoting Rhizobacteria[J].Biocontrol Science and Technology,2001,11(5):557-579.
[30] Bahme, Jb, Schroth, Mn. Spatial-Temporal Colonization Patterns of A Rhizobacterium on Underground Organs of Potato[J]. Phytopathology,1987,77(7):1093-1100.
[31] Yaryura PM, León M, Correa O S, et al. Assessment of the role of chemotaxis and biofilm formation as requirements for colonization of roots and seeds of soybean plants by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BNM339[J].Current Microbiology,2008,56(6):625-632.
[32] Hamon Morgan, Mbemba Elisabeth, Charnaux Nathalie, et al. A syndecan- 4CXCR4 complex expressed on human primary lymphocytes and macrophages and HeLa cell line binds the CXC chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1)[J].Glycobiology, 2004,14(4):311-323.
[33] 汪军,潘江禹,毛超,等.土壤物理因素和栽培方式对淡紫拟青霉E7在香蕉根际定殖和促生作用的影响[J].果树学报,2013,30(2):274- 280.
[34] 严婉荣,赵廷昌,肖彤斌,等.生防细菌在植物病害防治中的应用[J].基因组学与应用生物学,2013,32(4):533-539.
[35] Sanchez- Azofeifa, Yumi Oki, G. Wilson Fernandes, et al. Relationships between endophyte diversity and leaf optical properties[J].Trees-Structure and Function,2012,26(2):291-299.
[36] 张庭静.地黄内生菌的分离鉴定和产梓醇菌株的筛选及其发酵研究[D].河南:河南农业大学,2011:1-5.
[37] 胡炳福.两种抗生细菌防治林木土传病害研究初报[J],生物防治通报,1988,4(4):172-175.
[38] 张运强,谢艺贤,张辉强.橡胶树红根病病原菌的鉴定(II)[J].热带作物学报,2000,20(1):20-24.
[39] 伍慧雄,王胜坤,孙思.桉树青枯病的发生与防治[J].广东林业科技, 2006,22(3):53-55.
[40] 王建美,才玉石,陶万强,等.不同真菌菌株对黄栌的致病性研究[J].中国森林病虫,2008,27(3):1-3.
[41] 向玉英.杨树上发生的两种病毒[J].林业科学研究,1990,3(6):553- 557.
[42] 陈京元,徐红梅,蔡三山.松苗猝倒病不同病原物的致病性差异及其生防细菌的筛选[J].东北林业大学学报,2006.34(2):5-7.
[43] 张兴锋,柳凤.红树内生细菌CШ-1菌株鉴定及其保外抗菌蛋白性质[J].微生物学通报,2010,37(2):222-227.
[44] 金海强,贾斌,李熙英.杨树腐烂病内生拮抗细菌鉴定及防治研究[J].中国森林病虫,2012,31(6):1-4.
[45] 路宗岩.杉木炭疽病拮抗菌HY32的筛选及其应用[J].生物技术通报,2013,3:181-185.
[46] 张艳东,曹梦琪,王俊,等.桑树根腐病真菌病原拮抗细菌JK-7的分离与鉴定[J].蚕业科学,2013.39(2):0220-0225.
[47] Valiente C, Diaz K, Gacitúa S, et al. Control of charcoal root rot in Pinus radiata nurseries with antagonistic bacteria[J].World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology,2008,24(4):557-568.
[48] Carlos Marcelo Ribeiro, et al. Isolation, selection and characterization of root- associated growth promoting bacteria in Brazil Pine[J].Microbiological Research,2012,167(2):69-78.
[49] Elo S L. Maunuksela M. Salkinoja-Salonen, et al. Humus bacteria of Norway spruce stands: plant growth promoting properties and birch, red fescue and alder colonizing capacity[J].FEMS Microbiology Ecology,2000,31(2):143-152.
[50] Ren Jia-Hong, Li Hao, Wang Yan-Fang, et al. Biocontrol potential of an endophytic Bacillus pumilus JK-SX001 against poplar canker [J].Biological Control.2013,67(3):421-430.
[51] Ran L X, Liu CY , Wu G J, et al. Suppression of bacterial wilt in Eucalyptus urophylla by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. in China[J]. Biological Control,2005,32:111-120.
[52] 陈海英,廖富蘋,林健荣,等.拮抗细菌在植物病害防治中的应用及展望[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(20):8690-8691.
[53] 许彦君,刘海龙,刘新晶,等.细菌对植物病害生物防治研究进展[J].大豆科技,2011,05:18-24.
[54] Roose- Amsaleg C L, Garnier- sillam E, Harry M. Extraction and purification ofmicrobial DNA f rom soil and sediment samples[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2001,18:47-60.
[55] Grayst on S J, Prosser J I. Impact of cult ivation on characterization of species composition of soil bacterial communities[J]. FEMSMicrobiology Ecology,2001,35(1):37-48.

文章所在专题

棉花

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/