为有效利用茶园天敌控制病虫害，对茶园不同生产管理方式中的结网型蜘蛛进行调查，分析其群落的种类、组成和多样性。结果表明：结网型蜘蛛共采集到16科40种，多刺新园蛛(Neoscona polyspinipes)为优势种；低碳管理茶园(DT)与常规管理茶园(CG)间结网型蜘蛛群落组成存在明显差异，DT比CG的种类和个体数分别高出2.33倍和0.67倍。此外，多样性指数中，DT与CG差异明显，夏秋和冬春茶期间DT比CG分别增加1.39倍和1.05倍；DT均匀性指数数值较大，而CG优势度指数数值较大。主成分分析表明，DT明显向多刺新园蛛、雪银斑蛛(Argyrodes argentatus)、草间钻头蛛(Itatsina praticola)、卡氏盖蛛(Neriene cavaleriei)和温室希蛛(Achaearanea tepidariorum)等结网型蜘蛛群落数量分布较多的方向偏移。由此可知，茶园实行低碳管理，生境结构植物丰富，人为干扰少，有利于保护结网型蜘蛛种类多样性。
Abstract
In order to promote more effective pest control in tea plantations, we examined the effects of web spider communities in terms of species composition, structure and diversity in tea plantations subjected to different production management. Sampling was collected from tea plantations with low-carbon management (DT) and routine management (CG). The results showed that: Web spiders that were collected belonged to 5 families and 11 species, and Neoscona polyspinipes was the dominant species. The community structure in plantation DT was significantly richer than in plantation CG, with 2.67-fold and 0.68-fold the species and individual numbers, respectively. In addition, the diversity index, during summer-autumn and winter-spring, increased by 1.39-fold and 1.04-fold, respectively, in plantation DT compared with plantation CG, and had a much higher evenness index，and lower dominance index. Principal component analysis showed that plantation DT contained significantly distributed more community orientation offsets to the number of web spiders of Argyrodes argentatus, Itatsina praticola, Neoscona polyspinipes, Neriene cavaleriei, and Achaearanea tepidariorum. Therefore, low- carbon management, a rich habitat structure of plants, and less human interference were all conducive to the protection of web spider species diversity.
关键词
茶园； 低碳； 蜘蛛； 群落结构
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
tea plantations; low-carbon; spiders; community structure
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Yan X Y, Cai Z, Wang S W, et al. Direct measurement of soil organic carbon content change in the croplands of China[J]. Global Change Biology,2011(17):1487-1496.
[2] He Youjun, Qin Lin, Li Zhiyong, et al. Carbon storage capacity of monoculture and mixed-species plantations in subtropical China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2013(295):193-198
[3] 戴轩.假眼小绿叶蝉的天敌蜘蛛种类及其物种多样性研究[J].昆虫天敌,1999,21:164-169.
[4] 沈星荣,汪秋红,吴洵,等.充分发挥茶园碳汇功能,促进茶叶低碳生产发展[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(8):254-260.
[5] Connor E F, Courtney A C, Yoder J M. Individuals- area relationships: the relationship between animal population density and area[J]. Ecology,2000,81(3):734-748.
[6] 赵金钊.中国棉田蜘蛛[M].武汉:武汉出版社,1993:1-552.
[7] 韩宝瑜,有机、无公害和普通茶园蜘蛛群落组成及动态差异[J].蛛形学报,2005,14(2):104-107
[8] 庞冬辉,肖润林,侯柏华,等.生态管理对茶园节肢动物群落结构和多样性的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2010,18(6):1272-1276
[9] 王定锋,刘丰静,李慧玲,等.宁德市低海拔茶园蜘蛛群落结构及发生动态[J].茶叶科学,2013,33(5):457-464.
[10] 谭济才,邓欣,袁哲明.不同类型茶园昆虫、蜘蛛群落结构分析[J].生态学报,1998,18(3):291-294.
[11] 雷元胜.不同茶果间作茶园蜘蛛种群组成差异与控制小绿叶蝉效应的研究[J].茶业通报,2009,31(3):122-124.
[12] 吴琼梅,林胜,尤民生,等.烟稻邻作对稻田蜘蛛功能团的影响[J].福建农林大学学报:自然科学版,2011,40(4):337-340.
[13] 叶火香,崔林,何迅民,等.茶园间作柑桔杨梅或吊瓜对叶蝉及蜘蛛类群数量和空间格局的影响[J].生态学报,2010,30(22):6019-6026.
[14] 黎健龙,黎华寿,李家贤,等.不同茶树品种节肢动物多样性分析[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(31):274-279.
[15] Thioulouse J, Chessel D, Doledec S, et al. ADE- 4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software[J]. Statistics and Computing,1997,7(1):75-83.
[16] David Norse. Lowcarbon agriculture: Objectivesand policy pathways[J]. Environmental Development,2012(1):25-39
[17] Julian J C Dawson, Pete Smith. Carbon losses from soil and its consequences for land- use management[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2007(382):165-190.
[18] 孔箐锌,靳佩贞.低碳背景下的农业生物多样性保护思考[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(21):297-300.
[19] 黎健龙,唐劲驰,赵超艺,等.不同景观斑块结构对茶园节肢动物多样性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(5):1305-1312.
[20] 高东,何霞红,朱书生.利用农业生物多样性持续控制有害生物[J].生态学报,2011,31(24):7617-7624.
[21] 吴满霞,韩仁甲,汪升毅,等.苦李山茱萸或板栗与茶间作增进昆虫多样性的效应[J].昆虫知识,2010,47(6):1165-1169.
[22] 黎健龙,涂攀峰,陈娜,等.茶树与大豆间作效应分析[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(7):2040-2047.
[23] 朱璧然,黎健龙,刘杰,等.广东茶区蜘蛛新纪录及其地理分布[J].广东农业科学,2011(13):63-64.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
