不同棚膜对设施桃果实品质的影响

陈修德,高东升,米庆华,谭钺,郭玉才,李少旋,徐爱红

中国农学通报. 2009, 25(13): 254-259

中国农学通报 ›› 2009, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (13) : 254-259. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2009-0393
工程 机械 水利 装备

不同棚膜对设施桃果实品质的影响

  • 陈修德,高东升,米庆华,谭钺,郭玉才,李少旋,徐爱红
作者信息 +

Effects of different plasic film on fruit quality of peach in greenhouse

  • Chen Xiude,, Gao Dongsheng,, Mi Qinghua, Tan Yue,, Guo Yucai,, Li Shaoxuan,, Xu Aihong,
Author information +
History +

摘要

以日光温室栽培的4年生毛桃品种‘台农甜蜜’(Prunus persica cv.tainongtianmi)为试材，研究了涂覆型消雾无滴膜和内添加型消雾无滴膜的光温环境以及对果实品质的综合影响。结果表明：涂覆型消雾无滴膜比内添加型消雾无滴膜具有更好的紫外线-B透过率及保温保湿效果；同时涂覆型消雾无滴膜更有利于促进果实的生长以及糖、淀粉等的合成，可减少有机酸的合成，提高糖酸比，但不利于果实中蛋白质的合成。总体看来，涂覆型消雾无滴膜更有利于提高果实的综合品质。

Abstract

Four-year-old kansu peach ‘Taiwan farmers sweet’ (Prunus persica cv.tainongtianmi) which was grown in solar greenhouse was used as experiment material to research the comprehensive influence of Coating- anti-fog film and inner-added anti-fog film on light and temperature condition and fruit quality. Results showed as follows：Coating- anti-fog film has better ultraviolet-B transmittance, insulation and moisture retention than inner-added anti-fog film through the results. Meanwhile Coating-anti-fog film is more conducive to promoting the growth of the fruit, sugar, starch, also reducing the synthesis of organic acids and improving sugar acid ratio, but goes against the synthesis of protein. In a word Coating- anti-fog film is more conducive to improveing the comprehensive quality of the fruit.

关键词

涂覆型棚膜;内添加型棚膜;桃;果实品质;设施栽培

Key words

Coating-anti-fog film;inner-added anti-fog film;peach;fruit quality;protected cultivation

引用本文

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

导出引用
陈修德,高东升,米庆华,谭钺,郭玉才,李少旋,徐爱红. 不同棚膜对设施桃果实品质的影响. 中国农学通报. 2009, 25(13): 254-259 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2009-0393
Chen Xiude,, Gao Dongsheng,, Mi Qinghua, Tan Yue,, Guo Yucai,, Li Shaoxuan,, Xu Aihong,. Effects of different plasic film on fruit quality of peach in greenhouse. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2009, 25(13): 254-259 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2009-0393

参考文献

参考文献
[1]高东升.落叶果树自然休眠生物学研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2001:53-54.
[2]高东升,李宪利,张泽华.果树大棚温室栽培技术.北京:金盾出版社,1999:1-2.
[3]马光恕,廉华,闫明伟.不同覆盖材料对大棚内番茄生长发育的影响.吉林农业科学,2002,27(4):41-43.
[4]朱龙英,徐悌惟,唐简强,等.番茄耐低温和耐弱光性能鉴定方法初探.上海农业学报,1998,14(1):45-50.
[5]陈海江,段红喜,徐继忠,等.提高设施桃果实品质试验.山西果树,2003,1:4-5.
[6]王志强,何方,牛良,等.设施栽培油桃光合特性研究.园艺学报,2000,27(4):245-250.
[7]王志强,牛良,刘淑娥,等.设施栽培对油桃营养生长及果实生长发育的影响.果树学报,2002,19(2):98-103.
[8]周红英,伊承继,季玉彬,等.日光温室早红2号油桃栽培技术规程.河北果树,2002,(1):17-18.
[9]Vizzotto G, Pinton R, Varanini Z, et al. Sucrose accumulation in developing peach fruit. Physiologia. Plantarum, 1996, 96:225-230.
[10]廉华,马光恕,王智然.不同覆盖材料对大棚内若干环境指标及蔬菜生长发育的影响.黑龙江八一农垦大学学报,2002,14(1):19-21.
[11]赵世杰,刘华山,董新纯.植物生理学实验指导.北京:中国农业科技出版社,1998:69-72,98-107.
[12]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术.北京:高等教育出版社,2003:184-185.
[13]李宪利,高东升,史作安.桃塑料大棚高效栽培的尝试.落叶果树,1996,4:26-28.
[14]张冬梅,池宝亮,黄学芳,等.地膜覆盖导致旱地玉米减产的负面影响.农业工程学报,2008,24(4):99-102.
[15]侯连涛,江晓东,韩宾,等.不同覆盖处理对冬小麦气体交换参数及水分利用效率的影响.农业工程学报.2006,22(9):58-63.
[16]Li Fengmin, Guo Anhong, Wei Hong. Effects of clear plastic film mulch on yield of spring wheat. Field Crops Research, 1999, 63:79-86.
[17]Ravi V, Lourduraj A C. Comparative performance of plastic mulching on soil moisture content, soilt emperature and yield of rainfed cotton. Madras Agric J, 1996, 83:709-711.
[18]陈丽娟,张新民,王小军,等.不同土壤水分处理对膜上灌春小麦土壤温度的影响.农业工程学报,2008,24(4):9-13.
[19]张兵.浅谈果树设施栽培的温湿气光调控.山西果树,1998,(4):26-27.
[20]李元,王勋陵.紫外辐射增加对春小麦生理、产量和品质的影响.环境科学学报,1998.18(5):504-509.
[21]Zu Y, Li Y, Chen J, et al. Intraspecific responses in grain quality of 10 wheat cultivars to enhanced UV-B radiation under field conditions. J. Photochem. B:Biol, 2004, 74:95-100.
[22]徐建强,肖薇,张荣刚,等.UV-B辐射增强对小麦籽粒化学组分的影响.环境化学,2004,23(3):258-262.
[23]Gao W, Zheng Y, Slusser JR, et al. Effect of supple-mentary ultraviolet-B irradiance on maize yield and quality: A field experiment.Photochem.Photobiol, 2004, 80:127-131.
[24]王春乙,郭建平,郑有飞.二氧化碳、臭氧、紫外辐射与农作物生产.北京:气象出版社,1997:181-183.

Accesses

Citation

Detail
段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉