试验于2001年10月—2002年8月在攀枝花进行。处理药剂及其浓度为16.7%CaCN2、0.5%~2.0%H2CN2、0.5%~2.0%H2CN2+1%吐温80；处理时期为12月25日、1月10日、1月25日。最佳处理时间是1月10日；最佳处理组合是1.0% H2CN2 + 1.0%吐温80，霞多丽、佳美、梅尔诺、黑虎香分别提前萌芽16、13、11、4d；提前成熟17、13、14、6d；提高萌芽率4%、12%、17%、9%；芽眼成枝率提高40%、29%、37%、12%；提高果枝率为9%、8%、28%、4%，提高结果系数7%、7%、37%、3%。不同品种对处理反应有差异，对照黑虎香有药害现象。
Abstract
An experiment on prompting viticulture in the field was done during Oct., 2001-Aug., 2002.in Panzhihua vineyard. The treating with chemicals and their concentration were 16.7% CaCN2, 0.5%~2.0% H2CN2, 0.5%~2.0% H2CN2 +1.0%Tween80.The treatment on Jan.10 (1.0%H2CN2+ 1.0% tween 80) had the best dormancy breaking efficiency. It advanced ‘Chardonnay’, ‘Gamay’, ‘Merlot’ and ‘Fox’ sprouting by 16, 13, 11, 4 days, maturity periods by 17, 13, 14, 6 days respectively. It also enhanced the bud breaking percentages of the four varieties by 4%, 12%, 17%, 9% respectively, bud’s shoot-forming percentages by 40%, 29%, 37%, 12%, the fruit shoot percentages by 9%, 8%, 28%, 4%, fructification by 7%, 7%, 37%, 3% respectively. But the investigated data showed that the effects of the advancing maturity period were not remarkable by chemical treating.
关键词
CaCN2 ；H2CN2；酿酒葡萄；提前萌芽；成熟期
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
Wine grape;CaCN2;H2CN2;Promoting sprouting;Dormancy breaking.
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
1李华,房玉林,刘启光.南亚热带酿酒葡萄(系)引种研究．植物遗传资源科学,2001,2(4):21~26
2李华,陶永胜,房玉林.化学控制处理打破落叶果树休眠的研究进展.见:李华主编.葡萄与葡萄酒研究进展.西安:陕西人民出版社,2002.34~37
3晁无疾.氰氨基化钙、赤霉素对设施内葡萄萌芽的影响.葡萄栽培与酿酒,1998,(4):5~8
4张振文.葡萄品种学.西安:西安地图出版社,2000.59~61
5杨治元.南方葡萄结果母枝涂石灰氮的效应及使用技术.中国南方果树,2001,30(1):46~47
6Pires E J P,Terra M M,Pommer C V,et al. Adjustment of ideal H2CN2 concentration for breaking dormancy of grapevine in less warm region. Acta Hortic,1995,395:169~176
7Shulman Y, Nir G,Lavee S. Oxidative processes in bud dormancy and the use of hydrogen cyanamide in breaking dormancy. Acta Hort,1986,179:141~149
8Uzun H I, Kuden A B, Dennis F G, et al. Effects of hydrogen cyanamide application at various time, during dormancy on phonological stages and fruit characteristics of grapes. Acta Hort,1997, 441:201~206
9Kazuo I. Effects of bud scale removal, calcium cyanamide, GA3, and ethephon on bud break of ‘Muscat of Alexandria’ grape (Vitis vinifera L.). J Jpn Soc Hort Sci,1980,48(4):395~398
10Zeieke K. The effect of hydrogen cyanamide and benzyladenine on bud burst of cuttings of two Vitis species. Ethiopian J of Agri Sci,1986,8(1):11~17
11 Shulman Y, Lavee S. The effect of cyanamide on release from dormancy of grapevine buds. Scient Hort,1983,19:97~104
12Dokoozlian N Z, Williams L E, Neja R A. Chilling exposure and hydrogen cyanamide interact in breaking dormancy of grape buds. Hortscience,1995,30(6):1244~1247
13Uzun H I,Kuden A B, Dennis F G Jr. Effects of hydrogen cyanamide application at various time,during dormancy on phonological stages and fruit characteristics of grapes. Acta Hortic,1997,441:201~206
14Faust M,Erez A,Rowland L J,et al. Bud dormancy in perennial fruit trees: physiological basis for dormancy induction, maintenance, and release. Hortscience,1997,32(4):623~629
15 Kuroi I. Effects of calcium cyanamide and cyanamide on budbreak of ‘Kyoho’ grape. J Japan Soc Hort Sci,1985,54(3):301~306
16 Inglese P,Gullo G,Pace L S. Effect of cyanamide on budbreak and cane fruitfulness for ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit in relation to cane length and time of application. NewZealand J of Crop and Hort Sci, 1998,26:45~51
17杨耀祥.葡萄催芽剂氰氨基化钙使用方法之研究.农林学报(台湾),1984,33(1):97~116
18Lavee S, Shulman Y, Nir G. The effect of cyanamide on budbreak of grapevines Vitis vinifera L., In: Weaver R J (Ed) ,oc of Symp on bud dormancy in grapevine: Potential and practical uses of hydrogen cyanamide on grapevine. Univ of California, Davis,1984.17~19
19Dokoozlian N K,Ebisuda N C,Neja R A.Surfactants improve the response of grapevines to hydrogen cyanamide.Hortscience,1998,33(5): 857~859
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
