探地雷达技术在土壤性质探测应用中的研究进展

富美玲, 朱向明, 段文标

农学学报. 2024, 14(4): 93-100

PDF(1375 KB)
PDF(1375 KB)
农学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (4) : 93-100. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0214
农业信息 农业气象

探地雷达技术在土壤性质探测应用中的研究进展

作者信息 +

Research Progress of Application of Ground Penetrating Radar Technology in Soil Properties Detection

Author information +
History +

摘要

探地雷达(Ground Penetrating Radar, GPR)作为一种快速、无损的中小尺度近地传感技术,因其具有信息量大、分辨率高、空间连续性好等优点在土壤性质探测中得到广泛应用。在系统介绍探地雷达在探测土壤性质原理的基础上,概述了正演模拟方法与目前应用广泛的土壤介电模型,归纳了探地雷达技术在土壤性质(土壤含水量、土壤质地、土壤层次、土壤压实、土壤盐分)探测中的应用研究现状。并讨论了该技术在实地应用中存在的问题与局限性:实地探测影响因子复杂,难以分离,数据解译复杂且具有主观性,大部分研究仅停留在定性或半定量阶段等。最后针对探地雷达在土壤学领域的应用情况,提出了其不足与展望:随着信号处理技术的不断发展与理论研究的日益成熟,探地雷达在土壤特性探测中仍然是一个有潜力的工具。旨在为探地雷达在土壤性质探测应用中的研究提供参考。

Abstract

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) is recognized for its rapid, non-invasive technology in medium and small-scale near-earth sensing. It has been widely applied in soil property analysis due to its considerable data richness, high resolution and excellent spatial continuity. This article presented a comprehensive review of the principles underlying GPR’s use in soil property detection, elaborated on forward simulation methods and the prevalent soil dielectric models in use. It summarized the current advancements in applying GPR technology for assessing various soil properties, including moisture content, texture, stratification, compaction, and salinity. Additionally, the paper discussed the challenges and limitations in the field applications: the influence factors of field detection were complex, and the data interpretation was complex and subjective, most of the researches only stayed in the qualitative or semi-quantitative stage. Concluding perspective, the article pointed out that with ongoing advancements in signal processing and theoretical research, GPR held significant potential for future innovations in soil characteristic exploration. This work aimed to serve as a valuable resource for ongoing and future studies on the application of GPR in soil property investigation.

关键词

探地雷达 / 土壤性质 / 正演模拟 / 土壤介电模型

Key words

ground penetrating radar / soil properties / forward modeling / soil dielectric model

引用本文

导出引用
富美玲 , 朱向明 , 段文标. 探地雷达技术在土壤性质探测应用中的研究进展. 农学学报. 2024, 14(4): 93-100 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0214
FU Meiling , ZHU Xiangming , DUAN Wenbiao. Research Progress of Application of Ground Penetrating Radar Technology in Soil Properties Detection. Journal of Agriculture. 2024, 14(4): 93-100 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0214

参考文献

[1]
LOMBARDI F, ORTUANI B, FACCHI A, et al. Assessing the perspectives of ground penetrating radar for precision farming[J]. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(23):1-34.
Human activities along with climate change have unsustainably changed the land use in coastal zones. This has increased demands and challenges in mapping and change detection of coastal zone land use over long-term periods. Taking the Bohai rim coastal area of China as an example, in this study we proposed a method for the long time-series mapping and change detection of coastal zone land use based on Google Earth Engine (GEE) and multi-source data fusion. To fully consider the characteristics of the coastal zone, we established a land-use function classification system, consisting of cropland, coastal aquaculture ponds (saltern), urban land, rural settlement, other construction lands, forest, grassland, seawater, inland fresh-waters, tidal flats, and unused land. We then applied the random forest algorithm, the optimal classification method using spatial morphology and temporal change logic to map the long-term annual time series and detect changes in the Bohai rim coastal area from 1987 to 2020. Validation shows an overall acceptable average accuracy of 82.30% (76.70–85.60%). Results show that cropland in this region decreased sharply from 1987 (53.97%) to 2020 (37.41%). The lost cropland was mainly transformed into rural settlements, cities, and construction land (port infrastructure). We observed a continuous increase in the reclamation with a stable increase at the beginning followed by a rapid increase from 2003 and a stable intermediate level increase from 2013. We also observed a significant increase in coastal aquaculture ponds (saltern) starting from 1995. Through this case study, we demonstrated the strength of the proposed methods for long time-series mapping and change detection for coastal zones, and these methods support the sustainable monitoring and management of the coastal zone.
[2]
ZEHRA K, TARUN S, NAIYARA K, et al. Soil exploration using ground penetrating radar[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and environmental science, 2021, 889(1):1-10.
[3]
DE BENEDETTO D, CASTRIGNANÒ A, QUARTO R. A Geostatistical approach to estimate soil moisture as a function of geophysical data and soil attributes[J]. Procedia environmental sciences, 2013, 19:436-445.
[4]
JOL H M. Ground Penetrating Radar: theory and applications[M]. Elsevier, 2009.
[5]
DOOLITTLE J A, MINZENMAYER F E, WAITMAN S W, et al. Ground-penetrating radar soil suitability map of the conterminous United States[J]. Geoderma, 2007, 141(3):416-421.
[6]
ZAJÍCOVÁ K, CHUMAN T. Application of ground penetrating radar methods in soil studies: a review[J]. Geoderma, 2019, 343:116-129.
[7]
王敬朋, 王金满, 张雅馥, 等. 探地雷达技术探测土壤特性的研究进展[J]. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(01):242-252.
[8]
LIU X W, DONG X J, LESKOVAR D I. Ground penetrating radar for underground sensing in agriculture: A review[J]. International agrophysics, 2016, 30(4):533-543.
Belowground properties strongly affect agricultural productivity. Traditional methods for quantifying belowground properties are destructive, labor-intensive and pointbased. Ground penetrating radar can provide non-invasive, areal, and repeatable underground measurements. This article reviews the application of ground penetrating radar for soil and root measurements and discusses potential approaches to overcome challenges facing ground penetrating radar-based sensing in agriculture, especially for soil physical characteristics and crop root measurements. Though advanced data-analysis has been developed for ground penetrating radar-based sensing of soil moisture and soil clay content in civil engineering and geosciences, it has not been used widely in agricultural research. Also, past studies using ground penetrating radar in root research have been focused mainly on coarse root measurement. Currently, it is difficult to measure individual crop roots directly using ground penetrating radar, but it is possible to sense root cohorts within a soil volume grid as a functional constituent modifying bulk soil dielectric permittivity. Alternatively, ground penetrating radarbased sensing of soil water content, soil nutrition and texture can be utilized to inversely estimate root development by coupling soil water flow modeling with the seasonality of plant root growth patterns. Further benefits of ground penetrating radar applications in agriculture rely on the knowledge, discovery, and integration among differing disciplines adapted to research in agricultural management.
[9]
LEE J H, OH M H, PARK J, et al. Dielectric dispersion characteristics of sand contaminated by heavy metal, landfill leachate and BTEX (02-104B)[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2003, 105(1-3):83-102.
Experiments have been performed to investigate the dielectric properties of contaminated sand. The separate real and imaginary parts of a dielectric constant were investigated in the frequency range of 75 kHz to 12 MHz. The contaminated soils exhibit different complex dielectric dispersion from the uncontaminated soils. The variation in the real dielectric constant can be explained by a polarization mechanism while that in the imaginary dielectric constant by ionic conductivity loss mechanism. The differences of the dielectric behavior with contaminant types suggest that the monitoring of complex dielectric constant has the potential to classify contaminants. The additional analysis for the imaginary part of the dielectric constant can be recommended to obtain the clear information about the state of ionic contaminants in subsurface.
[10]
KLOTZSCHE A, JONARD F, LOOMS M C, et al. Measuring soil water content with ground penetrating Radar: A Decade of Progress[J]. Vadose zone journal, 2018, 17(1):1-9.
[11]
HUISMAN J A, HUBBARD S S, REDMAN J D, et al. Measuring soil water content with ground penetrating radar: A review[J]. Vadose zone journal, 2003, 2(4):476-491.
[12]
曹棋, 宋效东, 吴华勇, 等. 探地雷达地波法测定红壤区土壤水分的参数律定研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2020, 51(02):332-342.
[13]
GROTE K, HUBBARD S, RUBIN Y. Field-scale estimation of volumetric water content using ground-penetrating radar ground wave techniques[J]. Water resources research, 2003, 39(11):1321.
[14]
GALAGEDARA L W, PARKIN G W, NREDMAN J D, et al. Field studies of the GPR ground wave method for estimating soil water content during irrigation and drainage[J]. Journal of hydrology, 2004, 301(1):182-197.
[15]
HUISMAN J A, SPERL C, BOUTEN W, et al. Soil water content measurements at different scales: accuracy of time domain reflectometry and ground-penetrating radar[J]. Journal of hydrology, 2001, 245:48-58.
[16]
ZHOU L, YU D S, WANG Z Y, et al. Soil Water Content Estimation Using High-Frequency Ground Penetrating Radar[J]. Water, 2019, 11(5):1036.
The rapid high-precision and nondestructive determination of shallow soil water content (SWC) is of vital importance to precision agriculture and water resource management. However, the low-frequency ground penetrating radar (GPR) technology currently in use is insufficient for precisely determining the shallow SWC. Therefore, it is essential to develop and use a high-precision detection technology to determine SWC. In this paper, a laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the use of a high-frequency GPR antenna to determine the SWC of loamy sand, clay, and silty loam. We collected soil samples (0–20 cm) of six soil types of loamy sand, clay, and silty loam and used a high-frequency (2-GHz) GPR antenna to determine the SWC. In addition, we obtained GPR data and images as well as characteristic parameters of the electromagnetic spectrum and analyzed the quantitative relationship with SWC. The GPR reflection two-way travel times and the known depths of reflectors were used to calculate the average soil dielectric permittivities above the reflectors and establish a spatial relationship between the soil dielectric permittivity ( ε ) and SWC ( θ ), which was used to estimate the depth-averaged SWC. The results show that the SWC, which affects the attenuation of wave energy and the wave velocity of the GPR signal, is a dominant factor affecting the soil dielectric permittivity. In addition, the conductivity, magnetic soil, soil texture, soil organic matter, and soil temperature have substantial effects on the soil dielectric permittivity, which consequentially affects the prediction of SWC. The correlation coefficients R2 of the “ θ   ~   ε ” cubic curve models, which were used to fit the relationships between the soil dielectric permittivity ( ε ) and SWC ( θ ), were greater than 0.89, and the root-mean-square errors were less than 2.9%, which demonstrate that high-frequency GPR technology can be applied to determine shallow SWC under variable hydrological conditions.
[17]
KOYAMA C N, LIU H, TAKAHASHI K, et al. In-Situ measurement of soil permittivity at various depths for the calibration and validation of low-frequency SAR soil moisture models by using GPR[J]. Remote sensing, 2017, 9(6):580-580.
[18]
WIJEWARDANA Y G N S, GALAGEDARA L W. Estimation of spatio-temporal variability of soil water content in agricultural fields with ground penetrating radar[J]. Journal of hydrology, 2010, 391(1):26-35.
[19]
PETTINELLI E, VANNARONI G, DI PASQUO B, et al. Correlation between near-surface electromagnetic soil parameters and early-time GPR signals: An experimental study[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2):A25-A28.
We explore a new approach to evaluate the effect of soil electromagnetic parameters on early-time ground-penetrating radar (GPR) signals. The analysis is performed in a time interval which contains the direct airwaves and ground waves, propagating between transmitting and receiving antennas. To perform the measurements we have selected a natural test site characterized by very strong lateral gradient of the soil electrical properties. To evaluate the effect of the subsoil permittivity and conductivity on the radar response we compare the envelope amplitude of the GPR signals received in the first [Formula: see text] within [Formula: see text]-wide windows, with the electrical properties ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]) determined using time-domain reflectometry (TDR). The results show that the constitutive soil parameters strongly influence early-time signals, suggesting a novel approach for estimating the spatial variability of water content with GPR.
[20]
乔新涛, 曹毅, 毕如田. 基于AEA法的黄土高原矿区复垦农田土壤含水率特征研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2019, 50(1):63-69.
[21]
MATTEO A D, PETTINELLI E, SLOB E. Early-time GPR signal attributes to estimate soil dielectric permittivity: A theoretical stud[J]. IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2013, 51(3):1643-1654.
[22]
ALGEO J, VAN DAM R L, SLATER L. Early-time GPR: A method to monitor spatial variations in soil water content during irrigation in clay soils[J]. Vadose Zone journal, 2016, 15(11):1-9.
[23]
吴志远, 彭苏萍, 杜文凤, 等. 基于探地雷达波振幅包络平均值确定土壤含水率[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(12):158-164.
[24]
程琦, 张世文, 罗明, 等. 基于探地雷达粉煤灰充填复垦土壤含水率反演[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2021, 36(5):2159-2167.
[25]
雷少刚, 卞正富. 探地雷达测定土壤含水率研究综述[J]. 土壤通报, 2008, 236(5):1179-1183.
[26]
DOOLITTLE J A, INDORANTE S J, POTTER D K, et al. Comparing three geophysical tools for locating sand blows in alluvial soils of southeast Missouri[J]. Journal of soil water conservation, 2002, 57(3):175-182.
[27]
PATEL V N, CHAUDHAR P D, RANA V A, et al. Estimation of dielectric properties of clay loam and silty soil with different salinity levels over low frequency range[J]. Current science, 2021, 120(2):414-422.
[28]
GROTE K, ANGER C, KELLY B, et al. Characterization of soil water content variability and soil texture using GPR groundwave techniques[J]. Journal of environmental & engineering geophysics, 2010, 15(3):93-110.
[29]
STOFFREGEN H, YARAMANCI U, ZENKER T, et al. Accuracy of soil water content measurements using ground penetrating radar: Comparison of ground penetrating radar and lysimeter data[J]. Journal of hydrology, 2002, 267(3-4):201-206.
[30]
FREELAND R S, YODER R E, AMMONS J T. Mapping shallow underground features that influence site-specific agricultural production[J]. Journal of applied geophysics, 1998, 40(1-3):19-27.
[31]
DOOLITTLE J A, COLLINS M E. Use of soil information to determine application of ground penetrating radar[J]. Journal of applied geophysics, 1995, 33(1-3):101-108.
[32]
LAUER K, ALBRECHT C, SALAT C, et al. Complex effective relative permittivity of soil samples from the taunus region (Germany)[J]. Journal of earth science, 2010, 21(6):961-967.
[33]
MOURMEAUX N, TRAN A P, LAMBOT S. Soil permittivity and conductivity characterization by full-wave inversion of near-field GPR data[C]. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on ground penetrating radar,Brussels,Belgium, 2014:497-502.
[34]
TOSTI F, PATRIARCA C, SLOB E, et al. Clay content evaluation in soils through GPR signal processing[J]. Journal of applied geophysics, 2013, 97:69-80.
[35]
BENEDETTO F, TOSTI F. GPR spectral analysis for clay content evaluation by the frequency shift method[J]. Journal of applied geophysics, 2013,(97):89-96.
[36]
花东文, 韩霁昌, 张扬, 等. 基于探地雷达方法的新增耕地土层厚度估测-以南泥湾土地整治项目为例[J]. 土地开发工程研究, 2016, 1(1):31-36.
[37]
彭亮, 徐清, 朱忠礼, 等. 应用低频微波波段GPR测量土壤结构[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 43(3):324-329.
[38]
夏银行, 黎蕾, 邓少虹, 等. 基于探地雷达的喀斯特峰丛洼地土壤深度和分布探测[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016, 36(1):129-135.
[39]
LUO G B, CAO Y G, XU H X, et al. Research on typical soil physical properties in a mining area: Feasibility of three-dimensional ground penetrating radar detection[J]. Environmental earth sciences, 2021, 80(3):80-92.
[40]
HAN X L, LIU J T, ZHANG J, et al. Identifying soil structure along headwater hillslopes using ground penetrating radar based technique[J]. Journal of mountain science, 2016, 13(3):405-415.
[41]
曹棋, 宋效东, 杨顺华, 等. 基于探地雷达的典型红壤区网纹红土层识别[J]. 土壤学报, 2019, 56(4):813-824.
[42]
李俐, 付雪, 崔佳, 等. 基于包络检波和STFT谱分析的探地雷达土壤分层信息识别[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(2):316-327.
土壤分层信息,特别是表土层结构,对土地生产力具有重要影响,是评价土壤质量的一个重要指标。为了快速、准确地获取土壤分层信息,本文利用探地雷达对分层土壤进行了回波信号采集,并分别在时域和频域分析土壤层位置和层厚信息。首先在信号预处理的基础上,借助包络检波方法确定在土壤分层界面在时域上的位置;然后获取电磁波速度,得到土壤分层厚度。考虑到土壤介电常数与电磁波在土壤中传播速度的相关性,采用短时傅里叶变换方法(Short-time Fourier Transform,STFT)获取各土壤层时频域特征值,并利用回归分析建立特征值与介电常数之间的数学关系,实现对各土壤层的介电常数估算,从而计算出电磁波传播速度,进而确定土壤各层厚度。为验证算法的有效性,分别对理想模拟实验环境和农田环境进行了探地雷达实验,结果表明利用包络检波对探地雷达回波信息进行分析,土壤层检出率达到94.5%,借助STFT谱分析进行探地雷达回波速度估计,对于70 cm深度以上土层厚度计算误差大都保持在10%以下,但随着土壤深度的增加,误差变大。总体来说,本方法能有效识别浅层土壤的分层信息,可应用于实际生产中耕层厚度的估测。
[43]
RUAN W M, LIU B J, LIU H J, et al. Ground penetrating radar (GPR) identification method for agricultural soil stratification in a typical Mollisols Area[J]. Chinese geographical science, 2023, 33(4):664-678.
[44]
LIU C, LIU G, LI H R, et al. Using ground penetrating radar to investigate the thickness of mollic epipedons developed from loessial parent material[J]. Soil & tillage research, 2021, 212:1-8.
[45]
VORONIN Y, SAVIN I Y. GPR diagnostics of chernozem humus horizon thickness[J]. Russian agricultural sciences, 2018, 44(3):250-255.
[46]
KATEŘINA Z, TOMÁŠ C. O and A soil horizons’ boundaries detection using GPR under variable soil moisture conditions[J]. Geoderma, 2022,422.
[47]
吴全, 姚喜军, 陈晓东, 等. 基于探地雷达的土体构型无损探测方法研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(6):1-13.
[48]
许晨, 韦瑜. 基于小波变换和希尔伯特变换的N2红土层厚度识别方法研究-以西北地区崔木矿区为例[J]. 现代信息科技, 2022, 6(24):124-126+130.
[49]
张先武, 高云泽, 方广有. 带有低通滤波的广义S变换在探地雷达层位识别中的应用[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(1):309-316.
[50]
罗古拜, 曹银贵, 白中科, 等. 露天矿区排土场复垦地土壤容重差异、GPR特征识别与反演[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2019, 36(4):441-452.
[51]
WANG P, HU Z Q, ZHAO Y L, et al. Experimental study of soil compaction effects on GPR signals[J]. Journal of applied geophysics, 2016, 126:128-137.
[52]
XU H X, CAO Y G, LUO G B, et al. Variability in reconstructed soil bulk density of a high moisture content soil: A study on feature identification and ground penetrating radar detection[J]. Environmental earth sciences, 2022, 81(9):1-12.
[53]
CUI F, WU Z Y, WANG L, et al. Application of the Ground penetrating radar ARMA power spectrum estimation method to detect moisture content and compactness values in sandy loam[J]. Journal of applied geophysics, 2015(120):26-35.
[54]
GHOSE R, SLOB C E. Quantitative integration of seismic and GPR reflections to derive unique estimates for water saturation and porosity in subsoil[J]. Geophysical research letters, 2006, 33(5):L05404.
[55]
AKINSUNMADE A. GPR imaging of traffic compaction effects on soil structures[J]. Acta geophysica, 2021, 69(2):643-653.
Spatial and depth variability of soil characteristics greatly influence its optimum utilization and management. Concealing nature of soil subsurface horizons has made the traditional soil investigations which rely on point information less reliable. In this study, an alternative use of ground penetrating radar (GPR)—a near-surface geophysical survey method—was tested to address the shortcomings. The focus of the study was on assessment of characteristics variability of soil layers at a test site and evaluation of effects of compaction caused by machinery traffics on soil. GPR methods utilize electromagnetic energy in the frequency range of 10 MHz and 3.0 GHz. Fourteen profiles GPR data were acquired at the test site-a farmland in Krakow, Poland. Compaction on parts of the soil was induced using tractor movements (simulating traffic effects) at different passes. Data were processed using basic filtering algorithms and attributes computations executed in Reflexw software. Attempt made in the study was on use of GPR geophysical technique for soil assessment. The method allows delineation of the soil horizons which depicts characteristic depth changes and spatial variability within the horizons. Moreover, traffic effects that caused compaction on parts of the soil horizons were discernable from the GPR profile sections. Thus, similar densification like hardpan that may develop in natural setting can be investigated using the method. The results have shown the suitability of the method for quick, noninvasive and continuous soil investigation that may also allow assessment of temporal soil changes via repeated measurement.
[56]
PETERSEN H, FLEIGE H, RABBEL W, et al. Geophysical methods for imaging soil compaction and variability of soil texture on farm land[J]. Advances in goecology, 2006, 38:261-272.
[57]
CHEN X T, GAO R J, WANG Y L, et al. Microwave nondestructive monitoring and quantitative analysis of salinity pollution of reclamation soil[J]. Journal of Liaoning technical university (Natural Science), 2008, 27(2):309-311.
[58]
谢潇, 刘智杰, 花东文, 等. 探地雷达在盐渍土地区盐磐层判断中的应用[J]. 西部大开发(土地开发工程研究), 2019, 4(4):8-12+26.
[59]
薛建, 曾昭发, 田刚, 等. 探地雷达在吉林西部地区探测土壤碱化层[J]. 物探与化探, 2005, 28(5):421-424.
[60]
邹杰, 张金珠, 王振华, 等. 利用探地雷达低频天线监测滴灌棉田盐渍化土壤盐分迁移研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(4):836-844.
[61]
陈星彤, 高荣久, 王宇亮, 等. 复垦土壤盐分污染的微波无损探测及定量分析[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 27(2):309-311.
[62]
胡振琪, 陈星彤, 卢霞, 等. 复垦土壤盐分污染的微波频谱分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(6):56-60.
[63]
REJŠEK K, HRUŠKA J, KUBA L, et al. A methodological contribution to use of Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) as a tool for monitoring contamination of urbansoils with road salt[J]. Urban ecosystems, 2015, 18(1):169-188.
[64]
江红南. 探地雷达在干旱区盐渍化土壤层定量探测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2014, 38(4):800-803.
[65]
张金珠, 邹杰, 王振华, 等. 利用GPR多频天线振幅包络平均值法估算滴灌棉田土壤盐分含量[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(8):99-107.
[66]
MOGHADAS D, JADOON K Z, VEREECKEN H. Effects of near surface soil moisture profiles during evaporation on far-field Ground-penetrating radar data: A numerical study[J]. Vadose zone journal, 2013, 12(2):1-11.
[67]
谢国青, 陈紫秋. 探地雷达功率谱特征与土壤含水率相关关系分析[J]. 中国水运(下半月), 2022, 22(11):156-158.
[68]
李蕙君, 钟若飞. 探地雷达波振幅与土壤含水量关系的数值模拟[J]. 应用科学学报, 2015, 33(1):41-49.
[69]
宋文, 张敏, 吴克宁, 等. 潮土区农田土体构型层次的探地雷达无损探测试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(16):129-138.
[70]
张松. 黄土层地质雷达电磁场正演模拟研究[D]. 山东: 中国石油大学, 2016:39-66.
[71]
MINET J, WAHYUDI A, BOGAERT P, et al. Mapping shallow soil moisture profiles at the field scale using full-waveform inversion of ground penetrating radar data[J]. Geoderma, 2010, 161(3):225-237.
[72]
TOPP C G, DAVIS L J, ANNAN P A. Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines[J]. Water resources research, 1980, 16(3):574-582.
The dependence of the dielectric constant, at frequencies between 1 MHz and 1 GHz, on the volumetric water content is determined empirically in the laboratory. The effect of varying the texture, bulk density, temperature, and soluble salt content on this relationship was also determined. Time‐domain reflectometry (TDR) was used to measure the dielectric constant of a wide range of granular specimens placed in a coaxial transmission line. The water or salt solution was cycled continuously to or from the specimen, with minimal disturbance, through porous disks placed along the sides of the coaxial tube.
[73]
ROTH H C, MALICKI A M, PLAGGE R. Empirical evaluation of the relationship between soil dielectric constant and volumetric water content as the basis for calibrating soil moisture measurements by TDR[J]. Journal of soil science, 1992, 43(1):1-13.
[74]
张文瀚, 杜克明, 孙彦坤, 等. 基于探地雷达的田块尺度下不同深度土壤含水量监测[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2022, 4(1):84-96.
[75]
HERKELRATH W N, HAMBURG S P, MURPHY F. Automatic, real-time monitoring of soil-moisture in a remote field area with time domain reflectometry[J]. Water resources research, 1991, 27(5):857-864.
A multiplexing time domain reflectoinetry (TDR) system for real‐time monitoring of volumetric soil moisture content was developed. The system was tested at a remote field site in the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest in New Hampshire. The average value of soil moisture content in the top 500 mm of soil was measured every 4 hours for 1 year at 12 locations within a 12‐ by 18‐m plot. The system functioned well except when the air temperature dropped below −15°C, which caused the data logger tape recorder to stop. Calibrations run on undisturbed soil cores did not compare well with published curves developed for mineral soils, probably because of high soil organic matter content. The standard error of estimate of soil moisture content, indicated by the calibrations, was 0.02 cm3/cm3. The standard deviation of repeated moisture content measurements made in the field was 0.003 cm3/cm3. The effect of cable length on the TDR signal was investigated. It was found that long cables tend to attenuate the signal, ultimately making the measurement impractical. However, cable length had little effect on the calibration up to a length of 27 m. The coefficient of variation of the moisture content measurements taken at any given time ranged from 0.12 to 0.21 during the test period. As predicted by a stochastic analysis of soil moisture flow in heterogeneous soil, the spatial variability of the measurements decreased as average soil moisture increased.
[76]
朱安宁, 吉丽青, 张佳宝, 等. 不同类型土壤介电常数与体积含水量经验关系研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2011, 48(2):263-268.
[77]
巨兆强. 中国几种典型土壤介电常数及其与含水量的关系[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2005:24-32.
[78]
DOBSON C M, ULABY T F, HALLIKAINEN T M, et al. Microwave dielectric behavior of wet soil-part II: Dielectric mixing models[J]. IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 1985, GE-23(1):35-46.
[79]
FERRÉ A P, RUDOLPH L D, KACHANOSKI G R. Spatial averaging of water content by time domain reflectometry: Implications for twin rod probes with and without dielectric coatings[J]. Water resources research, 1996, 32(2):271-279.
The averaging of apparent relative dielectric permittivities by time domain reflectometry (TDR) is examined for properties varying along TDR waveguides and in the plane perpendicular to a TDR probe. A square root averaging model with uniform weighting factors describes the measured apparent relative dielectric permittivity for axially varying materials; variations in the transverse plane are described by an inverse averaging model with nonuniform spatial weighting. We define the sensitivity of a TDR probe as the change in the measured travel time for a given change in the average soil water content for rods of a fixed length. For rods with dielectric coatings, this sensitivity increases with the dielectric permittivity of the coating and the rod radius and decreases with the soil dielectric permittivity. Due to the dependence of the sensitivity on the soil water content, coated rods will not measure the actual average water content for conditions of axially variable water contents.
[80]
LEDIEU J, RIDDER P D, CLERCK P D, et al. A method of measuring soil moisture by time-domain reflectometry[J]. Journal of hydrology, 1986, 88(3-4):319-328.
[81]
WANG R J, SCHMUGGE J T. An empirical model for the complex dielectric permittivity of soils as a function of water content[J]. IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 1980, GE-18(4):288-295.
[82]
MIRONOV L V, DOBSON C M, KAUPP V, et al. Generalized refractive mixing dielectric model for moist soils[J]. IEEE Trans. geoscience and remote sensing, 2004, 42(4):773-785.
[83]
ANBAZHAGAN P, BITTELLI M, PALLEPATI R R, et al. Comparison of soil water content estimation equations using ground penetrating radar[J]. Journal of hydrology, 2020,588.
[84]
胡庆荣. 含水含盐土壤介电特性实验研究及对雷达图像的响应分析[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院(遥感应用研究所), 2003:89-130.
[85]
STOGRYN A. Equations for calculating the dielectric constant of saline water[J]. IEEE transactions on microwave theory and techniques, 1971, 19(8):733-736.
[86]
董磊磊, 王维真, 吴月茹. 盐渍土介电特性及模型改进研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(4):786-796.
[87]
邹杰, 张金珠, 王振华, 等. 膜下滴灌棉田Dobson介电模型参数修改及水盐含量反演[J]. 土壤, 2021, 53(6):1281-1289.
[88]
WU Y R, WANG W Z, ZHAO S J, et al. Dielectric properties of saline soils and an improved dielectric model in C-band[J]. IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2015, 53(1):440-452.
[89]
HU W, ZHANG L, CHEN B L, et al. Quantitative evaluation of soil ion content using an imaginary part model of soil dielectric constant[J]. Scientia agricola, 2019, 76(4):299-304.
[90]
赵学伟, 王萍, 李新举, 等. 基于BP神经网络GPR反演滨海盐渍土含盐量模型构建[J]. 山东农业科学, 2018, 50(5):152-155.

基金

国家重点研发计划(2021YFD1500102)
PDF(1375 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/