乡村振兴背景下新疆和田农村产业融合发展实践探索——基于水平、驱动力与模式的研究

王德斌, 吴文婕, 刘珊珊, 陈俏

农学学报. 2023, 13(12): 91-100

PDF(1657 KB)
PDF(1657 KB)
农学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (12) : 91-100. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0082
乡村振兴

乡村振兴背景下新疆和田农村产业融合发展实践探索——基于水平、驱动力与模式的研究

作者信息 +

Practical Exploration of Rural Industrial Integration Development in Hetian of Xinjiang Under the Background of Rural Revitalization ——Research Based on Level, Driving Force and Mode

Author information +
History +

摘要

积极探索农村产业融合发展实践,总结典型经验,推广发展新模式,旨在进一步拓展农村产业发展空间,优化农村产业结构,建立农村产业发展新业态,实现农村产业可持续繁荣。研究基于新疆和田地区2016—2020年统计年鉴数据,运用熵值法、熵权TOPSIS综合分析法、灰色关联度分析测算研究区农村产业融合发展水平及其驱动因素。结果显示:(1)研究期内,熵权TOPSIS综合得分呈上升趋势,表明新疆和田地区农村产业融合发展正处在发展阶段,产业融合行为、产业融合效果已初见成效。(2)市场需求因素对农村产业融合发展影响最为突出;技术创新与企业合作对农村产业融合发展具有促进作用;关联产业与农村产业融合发展较为密切。(3)和田地区各县市之间农村产业融合发展水平具有一定的空间相关性,与距离和田市市区距离呈一定正相关,但并非唯一决定因素。综上,研究提出“一产为基础,二产连两头”、“一产连三产,发挥多功能”、“二产中间连,一三齐发展”等产业融合模式,为和田地区实现脱贫巩固有效衔接乡村振兴可持续发展提供参考借鉴。

Abstract

The study explores the practice of integrated development of rural industries, summarizes typical experiences, and promotes new development modes, aiming at further expanding the development space of rural industries, optimizing the structure of rural industries, establishing new forms of rural industry development, and realizing the sustainable prosperity of rural industries. Based on the statistical yearbook data of Hetian region from 2016 to 2020, this paper uses entropy method, entropy weight TOPSIS comprehensive analysis method and grey correlation analysis to calculate the development level and driving factors of rural industrial integration in Hetian region of Xinjiang. The results are as follows. (1) During the study period, the comprehensive score of entropy weight TOPSIS shows an upward trend, indicating that the development of rural industrial integration in Hetian is in an initial development stage, the industrial integration behavior and the effect of industrial integration have achieved initial results. (2) The market demand has the most prominent influence on the integrated development of rural industries; technological innovation and enterprise cooperation have a promoting effect on the integrated development of rural industries; the related industries are closely related to the integrated development of rural industries. (3) The development level of rural industrial integration among counties and cities in Hetian region has a spatial correlation, which is positively correlated with the distance from Hetian City, but it is not the only determinant factor. To sum up, this paper puts forward the industrial integration modes of "primary industry as the foundation, secondary industry connecting two ends", "primary industry connecting tertiary industry, giving full play to multiple functions" and "secondary industry connecting in the middle, and primary and tertiary industry developing together", which provides a reference for Hetian region to achieve effective connection between poverty alleviation consolidation and rural revitalization sustainable development.

关键词

乡村振兴 / 产业融合 / 实践探索 / 新疆和田

Key words

rural revitalization / industrial integration / practical exploration / Hetian, Xinjiang

引用本文

导出引用
王德斌 , 吴文婕 , 刘珊珊 , 陈俏. 乡村振兴背景下新疆和田农村产业融合发展实践探索——基于水平、驱动力与模式的研究. 农学学报. 2023, 13(12): 91-100 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0082
WANG Debin , WU Wenjie , LIU Shanshan , CHEN Qiao. Practical Exploration of Rural Industrial Integration Development in Hetian of Xinjiang Under the Background of Rural Revitalization ——Research Based on Level, Driving Force and Mode. Journal of Agriculture. 2023, 13(12): 91-100 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0082

参考文献

[1]
张永强, 蒲晨曦, 张晓飞, 等. 供给侧改革背景下推进中国农村一二三产业融合发展——基于日本“六次产业化”发展经验[J]. 世界农业, 2017, 457(5):44-50.
[2]
KENTARO Y. Economic valuation of multifunctional roles of agriculture in hilly mountainous areas in Japan[J]. Journal of political economy, 2001(5):152-174.
[3]
SALTZSTEIN S, ROSENBERG F. Ulceration colitis of the ileum, and regional enteritis of the colon a comparative histologist study.[J]. American journal of clinical pathology, 1963,40.
[4]
BORNKESSEL S, BRING S, OMTA S. Analysis indicators of industry convergence in four robotics innovation value chains[J]. Journal on chain and network science, 2014, 14(3):213-229.
The relevance of cross-industry innovation has increased in recent decades with a growing number of inter-industry fields emerging on the borderline between formerly distinct industries. The aim of this paper is to analyse industry convergence in four probiotics innovation value chains based on the following indicators: cross-industry relationships along the innovation value chain as well as knowledge, technological, regulatory and competence convergence. In so doing, the study delivers a framework of indicators for scrutinising industry convergence processes. In order to identify industry convergence, we analyse companies in the converging area of foods and drugs based on products containing the four bacteria strains: Lactobacillus caseii DN 114001, Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12, Lactobacillus acidophilus LA5 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Hence, the commercial availability of the strains on the market serves as a selection criterion. Altogether 12 companies stemming from four industrial backgrounds, food and agriculture (5), pharmaceutics (5), chemistry (1) and personal care (1), as well as one research organisation are identified. Cross-industry relationships occur along the innovation value chains of the four strains. Clear signs of knowledge and technological convergence are found as companies are not only publishing and patenting in the usual area of their own industrial field but also in the area of other industrial fields. Companies with different industrial backgrounds show activities in obtaining health claims indicating regulatory convergence. Companies' competence bases seem to converge as companies with different industrial backgrounds are involved in acquisitions, licencing agreements and strategic alliances (competence convergence). We contribute to the existing body of literature by assessing industry convergence from an innovation value chain perspective with a set of indicators reflecting the intensity of industry convergence. This framework of indicators stemming from literature has not yet been used in a combined comprehensive analysis. Furthermore, we tried to show the characteristics of strategic types driving industry convergence in probiotics.
[5]
杨博文, 李红梅. 商贸流通产业融合对区域经济发展的驱动机理分析[J]. 商业经济研究, 2022, 845(10):9-12.
[6]
张琳. 农村产业融合驱动乡村振兴路径研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2020.
[7]
YOUNGJUNG G, MOON K, SUNGJOO L. How industrial convergence happens a taxonomy approach based on empirical evidences[J]. Technological forecasting & social change, 2016, 10(7):112-120.
[8]
贾卫峰, 王朔, 陈子凤, 等. 技术融合视角下的产业融合创新[J]. 西安邮电大学学报, 2020, 25(1):105-110.
[9]
江登斌. 试论农村多元经济融合[J]. 经济问题, 1994, 17(8):10-12.
[10]
姜长云. 推进农村一二三产业融合发展新题应有新解法[J]. 中国发展观察, 2015(2):18-22.
[11]
杨涛. 农村产业融合的实践特征与提升路径[J]. 中州学刊, 2019(5):37-42.
[12]
米吉提·哈得尔, 杨梅. 农村产业融合发展的现实困境与改进策略[J]. 农业经济, 2022(1):55-57.
[13]
赵趁. 城乡融合背景下农村一二三产业融合发展新模式及实现路径[J]. 农业经济, 2019(11):9-11.
[14]
马晓河. 推进农村一二三产业深度融合发展[J]. 中国合作经济, 2015, 334(2):43-44.
[15]
郝华勇. 特色产业引领农村一二三产业融合发展——以湖北恩施州硒产业为例[J]. 江淮论坛, 2018, 33(4):19-24.
[16]
孙学立. 农村一二三产业融合组织模式及其路径创新[J]. 沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 42(1):57-63.
[17]
李治, 王一杰, 胡志全. 农村一、二、三产业融合评价体系的构建与评价——以北京市为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019, 40(11):111-120.
[18]
余涛. 农村一二三产业融合发展的评价及分析[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2020(11):76-85.
[19]
田聪华, 韩笑, 苗红萍, 等. 新疆农村一二三产业融合发展综合评价指标体系构建及应用[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(3):580-588.
目的 研究针对新疆农村一二三产业发展现状,构建指标体系,对其发展进行评价,找出薄弱环节,提出推进新疆农村一二三产业融合发展措施。方法 收集相关文献资料,运用德尔菲法,聘请相关专家对评价指标进行打分,采用层次分析法和综合指数法构建评价指标体系。结果 新疆农村一二三产业融合发展即将步入成长阶段,发展的薄弱环节主要在农民组织化程度,农业的多功能性的拓展,农产品电子商务发展,农业科技投入,转移劳动力和农村公共资源短缺等方面。结论 新疆已经具备农村一二三产业融合发展的基础,以培育新型农业经营主体为核心,以科技为引领,以融合程度高、带动性强的农业产业化龙头企业为依托,推进农村一二三产业融合发展。
[20]
李芸, 陈俊红, 陈慈. 农业产业融合评价指标体系研究及对北京市的应用[J]. 科技管理研究, 2017, 37(4):55-63.
[21]
陈池波, 李硕, 田云. 中国农村一二三产业融合度与省际比较分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(2):326-334.
[22]
陈盛伟, 冯叶. 基于熵值法和TOPSIS法的农村三产融合发展综合评价研究——以山东省为例[J]. 东岳论丛, 2020, 41(5):78-86.
[23]
陈慈, 陈俊红, 龚晶. 农业产业融合发展的理论与实践[M]. 北京: 中国经济出版社, 2020:13-19.
[24]
王玲. 江苏省农村产业融合水平测度与区域差异分析[J]. 农业经济, 2017(6):21-22.
[25]
张钟允, 朱捷. 农村三产融合评价体系构建及应用——以传统农区山东省为例[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2021, 32(7):42-45.
[26]
谭明交. 农村一二三产业融合发展:理论与实证研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2016.
[27]
杨宾宾, 魏杰, 宗义湘, 等. 乡村产业融合发展水平测算[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(2):125-128.
[28]
陈鹏. 长江经济带旅游高质量发展评价研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2021.
[29]
田富俊, 储巍巍, 刘彦. 科技创新与文化产业融合发展实证分析——基于灰色关联分析法[J]. 湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 26(1):21-28.
[30]
何刚, 杨静雯, 鲍珂宇, 等. 新型城镇化对区域生态环境质量的空间相关性及效应分析[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2020, 20(5):1958-1966.

基金

新疆维吾尔自治区高校科研计划人文社科青年项目“和田地区脱贫巩固与乡村产业融合实践研究”(XJEDU2021SY014)
PDF(1657 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/