data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50b0b/50b0b1907448008005f1520ac4ac47532387da83" alt=""
PEG模拟干旱胁迫对聚合草叶片生理特性的影响
PEG Simulating Drought Stress: Effect on Physiological Characteristics of Symphytum officinale Leaves
为研究PEG模拟干旱胁迫环境下聚合草叶片的生理变化,设置不同浓度的PEG溶液(0%、5%、10%、15%、20%、25%)进行处理,对其可溶性糖含量、可溶性蛋白含量、游离脯氨酸含量、过氧化物酶活性、超氧化物歧化酶活性进行测定。结果表明,随着PEG浓度(0%~25%)的增加,可溶性糖含量、可溶性蛋白质含量、POD活性、SOD活性均呈现先上升后下降的趋势。当PEG浓度上升到10%时,POD和SOD活性达到最高值,分别为270.3 U/(g·min)、1167.7 U/g;可溶性糖和可溶性蛋白质含量达到最高值,分别为1.9 µg/g、236.2 µg/g。游离脯氨酸含量随着PEG浓度的升高表现为先下降后上升的趋势,当浓度为10%时,脯氨酸含量到达最低值20.3 µg/g。研究结果表明聚合草具有一定的抗旱性,在轻度干旱环境下通过调节能力可以缓解自身受到的伤害。
To study the physiological changes of Symphytum officinale leaves under PEG simulating drought stress, different concentrations of PEG (0%, 5%, 10%, 15% 20%, 25%) were set up. The soluble sugar content, soluble protein content, free proline content, peroxidase activity and superoxide dismutase activity were measured. The results showed that with the increase of PEG concentrations (0%~25%), the soluble sugar content, the soluble protein content, POD activity and SOD activity increased first and then decreased. When the PEG concentration increased to 10%, POD activity and SOD activity reached the highest value, 270.3 U/(g·min) and 1167.7 U/g, respectively; the soluble sugar content and the soluble protein content was up to the maximum, 1.9 μg/g, 236.2 μg/g, respectively. The free proline content decreased first and then increased with the increase of PEG concentrations. When the concentration was 10%, the proline content reached the lowest value of 20.3 μg/g. It indicates that Symphytum officinale has a certain drought resistance, and it could alleviate the damage suffered through own adjustment ability in mild drought environment.
聚合草 / PEG / 干旱胁迫 / 生理特性 / 抗旱性 {{custom_keyword}} /
Symphytum officinale / PEG / Drought Stress / Physiological Characteristics / Drought Resistance {{custom_keyword}} /
[1] |
邵艳军, 山仑. 植物耐旱机制研究进展[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2006,14(4):16-20.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[2] |
李寿田, 韩建国, 毛培胜. 6个草地早熟禾品种苗期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 草业科学, 2012,29(7):1114-1119.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[3] |
赵永平, 姬苗苗, 朱亚, 等. 干旱胁迫对不同基因型甜叶菊幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2018,30(10):41-44.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[4] |
马艳红, 刘旭婷, 张旭婷, 等. 干旱胁迫对蒙古冰草苗期根系特征及生理特性的影响[J]. 种子, 2017,36(11):66-69.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[5] |
易家宁, 王康才, 张琪绮, 等. 干旱胁迫对紫苏生长及品质的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2020,34(6):1320-1326.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[6] |
李瑞姣, 陈献志, 岳春雷, 等. 干旱胁迫对日本荚蒾幼苗光合生理特性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(6):2041-2047.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[7] |
迟琳琳. 科尔沁沙地4种灌木对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017,31(5):158-162.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[8] |
姜东燕, 刘斌. 俄罗斯饲料菜的栽培技术及利用价值[J]. 北方园艺, 2007(10):104.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[9] |
耿慧, 王志锋. 聚合草的栽培与利用[J]. 新农业, 2017(21):29-31.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[10] |
董双涛, 李宝霞, 霍乃蕊. 聚合草叶蛋白的酸化加热法提取工艺研究[J]. 山西中医学院学报, 2012,13(2):45-47.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[11] |
李凤玲, 何金环. 聚合草鲜草叶蛋白提取条件研究[J]. 中国草地学报, 2009,31(2):76-80.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[12] |
高文伟, 王震, 霍乃蕊, 等. 聚合草多肽的酶法制备及其免疫活性研究[J]. 核农学报, 2017,31(7):1330-1338.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[13] |
段梦颖, 刘坤, 尚红梅, 等. 干燥方式对聚合草多糖理化性质和抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2018,46(10):8-14.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[14] |
张翠梅, 师尚礼, 吴芳. 干旱胁迫对不同抗旱性苜蓿品种根系生长及生理特性影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(5):868-882.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[15] |
李合生. 植物生理生化实验指导与技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1999.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[16] |
区智, 邹旭, 周长梅, 等. PEG-6000模拟干旱胁迫对灯台树幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018,31(6):1180-1184.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[17] |
韩忠明, 王云贺, 胥苗苗, 等. 干旱胁迫对防风生理特性及品质的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2017,45(11):100-106.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[18] |
张卫红, 刘大林, 苗彦军, 等. 西藏3种野生牧草苗期对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2017,37(21):7277-7285.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[19] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[20] |
朱凤荣. 干旱胁迫对三种草本植物生理生化特性的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019,58(6):88-91.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[21] |
张爱慧, 朱士农, 刘广勤, 等. 模拟干旱胁迫对黄瓜幼苗生长及生理特性影响的研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2009(6):200-202.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
{{custom_ref.label}} |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |