甘油三酯指纹图谱在食用植物油掺伪鉴别中的应用

翁嘉, 黄秀丽, 朱文娟, 王晓琴

农学学报. 2021, 11(10): 95-101

PDF(1665 KB)
PDF(1665 KB)
农学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (10) : 95-101. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20190600065
食品科学

甘油三酯指纹图谱在食用植物油掺伪鉴别中的应用

作者信息 +

Application of Triglyceride Fingerprint in Identification of Adulterated Edible Oil

Author information +
History +

摘要

为了构建橄榄油、大豆油、花生油、玉米油、葵花籽油、菜籽油的甘油三酯指纹图谱,采用反相液相色谱-蒸发光散射检测器对6种食用植物油中甘油三酯进行分离,图谱数据采用平均矢量法导入中药色谱指纹图谱相似度评价系统(2012版),分析指纹图谱的相似度。结果表明,同一种食用植物油不同品牌间的甘油三酯指纹图谱相似度高,不同食用植物油的甘油三酯指纹图谱差异明显。橄榄油与玉米油、大豆油及葵花籽油相似度比较低,分别为0.233、0.086、0.073;与菜籽油、花生油相似度较高,分别为0.830和0.776。当橄榄油中掺入10%的大豆油、玉米油或葵花籽油时,其指纹图谱相似度均低于0.90。橄榄油中掺入菜籽油后其相似度变化不明显。采用面积归一法对指纹图谱特征峰进行分析,掺入比例的检出限低于15%。甘油三酯指纹图谱与面积归一法相结合,可作为食用植物油鉴定及掺伪鉴别的有效手段。

Abstract

To construct the triglyceride fingerprint of olive oil, soybean oil, peanut oil, corn oil, sunflower oil and rapeseed oil, triglycerides of the six edible vegetable oils were isolated by HPLC-ELSD. The data was imported into the traditional Chinese medicine chromatographic fingerprint similarity evaluation system (version 2012) by the average vector method, and the similarity of the fingerprint was analyzed. The results showed that the fingerprint profile of triglycerides was similar among different brands of the same edible vegetable oil, while was significantly different among various edible vegetable oils. Olive oil had low similarity with corn oil, soybean oil, or sunflower oil, and the similarity was 0.233, 0.086 and 0.073, respectively; however, it had high similarity with rapeseed oil and peanut oil, and the similarity was 0.830 and 0.776, respectively. When olive oil was mixed with 10% corn oil, soybean oil, or sunflower oil, the similarity of triglyceride fingerprint was less than 0.90, but the similarity change was not obvious when mixed with rapeseed oil. Area normalization method was used to analyze the characteristic peak of fingerprint, and the detection limit of adulteration ratio was less than 15%. The combination of triglyceride fingerprint and area normalization method can be an effective method for identification the adulteration of edible vegetable oil.

关键词

食用植物油 / 甘油三酯 / 指纹图谱 / 种类鉴定 / 掺伪鉴别

Key words

edible vegetable oil / triglyceride / fingerprint / identification / adulteration

引用本文

导出引用
翁嘉 , 黄秀丽 , 朱文娟 , 王晓琴. 甘油三酯指纹图谱在食用植物油掺伪鉴别中的应用. 农学学报. 2021, 11(10): 95-101 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20190600065
Weng Jia , Huang Xiuli , Zhu Wenjuan , Wang Xiaoqin. Application of Triglyceride Fingerprint in Identification of Adulterated Edible Oil. Journal of Agriculture. 2021, 11(10): 95-101 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20190600065

参考文献

[1]
籍淑贤, 魏芳, 胡娜, 等. 食用植物油中甘油三酯色谱分析方法研究进展[J]. 分析测试学报, 2014, 33(1):112-118.
[2]
朱桃花, 范璐, 钱向明, 等. HPLC分析植物油脂甘油三酯结构组成的研究现状[J]. 中国油脂, 2011, 36(5):59-63.
[3]
张东, 龙伶俐, 薛雅琳, 等. 液质联用分析常见植物油甘油三酯[J]. 粮油食品科技, 2012, 20(6):33-37.
[4]
管方方, 何卓琼, 方燕, 等. GC-MS 分析食用油中甘油三酯的研究进展[J]. 中国油脂, 2014, 39(5):76-80.
[5]
赵海珍, 陆兆新, 别小妹, 等. 高效液相色谱法测定猪油甘油三酯中的脂肪酸位置分布[J]. 色谱, 2005(2):142-145.
[6]
何榕, 山晓琳, 董方圆, 等. 反相超效液相色谱–质谱联用分离分析食用油中的甘油三酯[J]. 分析化学, 2015, 43(9):1377-1382.
[7]
Byrdwell W C, Emken E A, Nef W E, et al. Quantitative analysis of triglycerides using atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry[J]. Lipids, 1996, 31(9):919-935.
Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-mass spectrometry (APCI-MS) was used for quantitative analysis of triglycerides (TG) separated by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. APCI-MS was used for analysis of mono-acid TG standards containing deuterated internal standard, of a synthetic mixture of heterogeneous TG, of randomized and normal soybean oils and of randomized and normal lard samples. Quantitation of the TG by four approaches based on APCI-MS were compared, and these were compared to quantitation obtained using liquid chromatography (LC) with flame-ionization detection (FID). The APCI-MS methods were based on (i) calibration curves from data for mono-acid TG standards, (ii) response factors obtained from a synthetic mixture of TG, (iii) response factors calculated from comparison of randomized samples to their statistically expected compositions, and (iv) response factors calculated from comparison of fatty acid (FA) compositions calculated from TG compositions to FA compositions obtained by calibrated gas chromatography (GC) with FID. Response factors derived from a synthetic mixture were not widely applicable to samples of disparate composition. The TG compositions obtained using APCI-MS data without application of response factors had average relative errors very similar to those obtained using LC-FID. Numerous TG species were identified using LC/APCI-MS which were undetected using LC-FID. Two quantitation methods, based on response factors calculated from randomized samples or on response factors calculated from FA compositions, both gave similar results for all samples. The TG compositions obtained using response factors calculated from FA compositions showed less average relative error than was obtained from LC-FID data, and were in good agreement with predicted compositions for the synthetic mixture and for randomized soybean oil and lard samples.
[8]
张樱, 王豪, 林振兴, 等. 内燃机油高效液相指纹图谱的建立[J]. 分析测试学报, 2013, 32(6):737-741.
[9]
Hamdy E L, Fizgank E L. Detection of olive oil adulteration by measuring its authenticity factor using reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography[J] J. Chromatogr. A, 1995, 708(2):351-355.
[10]
Rayda B, Naziha K G, Ahmed R. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Safety, 2013, 12(2):218-227.
[11]
Nef W E, Byrdwell W C. Soybean oil triacylglycerol analysis by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography coupled with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry[J]. Journal of the American oil chemists’society, 1995, 72(10):1185-1191.
[12]
Parcerisa J, Casals I, Boatella J, et al. Analysis of olive and hazelnut oil mixtures by high-performance liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry of triacylglycerols and gas-liquid chromatography of non-saponifiable compounds (tocopherols and sterols)[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 2000, 881(1/2):149-158.
[13]
宁德山, 唐青涛, 陈路林. 液相色谱指纹图法鉴别灵芝孢子油掺伪研究[J]. 临床医学工程, 2009, 16(12):65-66.
[14]
姚云平, 李昌模, 刘慧琳, 等. 指纹图谱技术在植物油鉴定和掺假中的应用[J]. 中国油脂, 2012, 37(7):51-54.
[15]
李雪琴, 黎海红, 苗笑亮. 指纹图谱相似度在芝麻油掺伪检测中的应用[J]. 食品科技, 2009, 34(3):259-264.
[16]
兰庆丰, 梁敏. 气相色谱法鉴别掺假食用油的研究[J]. 刑事技术, 2006(1):37-39.
[17]
张国文, 倪永年, 涂北平. 食用植物油的分类和质量鉴别的模式识别研究[J]. 食品科学, 2005(1):71-75.
[18]
鲍方宇, 张敏. 薄层色谱法测定油脂中甘油三酯含量[J]. 食品科学, 2013, 34(4):125-128.
[19]
耿曼璐, 赵贝贝, 兰韬, 等. 食用油甘油三酯及其氧化聚合物分析方法研究进展[J]. 中国油脂, 2017, 42(1):134-138.
[20]
洪颖. 食用油脂甘油三酯组成特征及HPLC测定方法研究[D]. 无锡:江南大学, 2015.
[21]
孟祥河, 章银军, 毛忠贵. 甘油酯的分析方法[J]. 中国油脂, 2004, 29(1):44-46.
[22]
刘涛, 尹春华, 谭天伟. 高效液相色谱–蒸发光散射检测器测定脂肪酸和甘油酯的含量[J]. 中国油脂, 2005, 30(9):52-55.
[23]
张文婷, 程夏倩, 徐靖, 等. HPLC-ELSD测定灵芝孢子油中甘油三酯的含量[J]. 中国现代应用药学, 2017, 34(5):719-722.
[24]
GH/T 1087—2013蜂胶真实性鉴别方法高效液相色谱指纹图谱法.
[25]
DB33/T 735—2009 掺假山茶油定性鉴别气相色谱法.
[26]
陈辉, 戚建良, 李玉华, 等. 利用GC-MS指纹图谱技术快速检测掺伪大豆油的橄榄油[J]. 粮油加工:电子版, 2014(9):46-47,50.
[27]
张青龄. 气相色谱法鉴别橄榄油掺伪的研究[J]. 粮食储藏, 2014, 43(4):36-38.

基金

广东省科技厅项目“灵芝孢子油质量评价体系及掺伪鉴别研究”(2015A030401012)

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。
PDF(1665 KB)

文章所在专题

小麦

资源与环境

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/