基于生态服务付费的秸秆机械化还田补贴政策探析

姚科艳

农学学报. 2018, 8(6): 92-95

PDF(1025 KB)
PDF(1025 KB)
农学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (6) : 92-95. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas17110027
三农问题研究 农村产业结构

基于生态服务付费的秸秆机械化还田补贴政策探析

  • 姚科艳
作者信息 +

Subsidy Policy of Mechanized Straw Returning Based on Payments for Ecological Services

Author information +
History +

摘要

焚烧农作物秸秆既是农业资源极大浪费,又严重破坏生态环境。机械化还田是秸秆综合利用的重要途径,具有良好的生态效益和部分经济效益。在我国江苏等地,政府近年来对机械化还田给予定额补贴。本文通过分析秸秆还田补贴政策的不同方式,对比借鉴国外政府购买生态服务(PES)的经验,从大力发展农机服务市场、科学制定生态补偿标准、重视培育第三方组织、充分发挥市场机制作用等方面,提出对农作物秸秆还田补贴政策进行优化。

Abstract

Crop residues burnt in open field is not only a waste of agricultural resources, but also a serious damage to the ecological environment. Mechanized straw returning is an important way for comprehensive utilization of straw, with good ecological and economic benefits. In our country, Jiangsu province and other places, the government has given fixed subsidies to mechanized straw returning in recent years. Through analyzing the different ways of the subsidy policy of returning straw to farmland, comparing the foreign government"s experience of payments for ecological service (PES), Straw subsidy policy can be optimized from the following aspects:Vigorously develop agricultural machinery service market, Scientifically formulating ecological compensation standard, paying attention to cultivating third-party organization and giving full play to the role of market mechanism.

关键词

生态服务;秸秆还田;补贴

Key words

Ecological service; straw returning; subsidy

引用本文

导出引用
姚科艳. 基于生态服务付费的秸秆机械化还田补贴政策探析. 农学学报. 2018, 8(6): 92-95 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas17110027
Subsidy Policy of Mechanized Straw Returning Based on Payments for Ecological Services. Journal of Agriculture. 2018, 8(6): 92-95 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas17110027

参考文献

[1]彭春艳,罗怀良,孔静.中国作物秸秆资源量估算与利用状况研究进展[J].中国农业资源与区划,2014(3):14-20.
[2]曹国良,张小曳,郑方成等.中国大陆秸秆露天焚烧的量的估算[J].资源科学, 2006, 28(1):9-13.
[3]王丽,李雪铭,许妍.中国大陆秸秆露天焚烧的经济损失研究[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2008, 22(2):170-175.
[4]袁立明.秸秆焚烧的危害不止是雾霾[J].地球,2015(12):16-18.
[5]关于进一步加快推进农作物秸秆综合利用和禁烧工作的通知.国家发展改革委,财政部,农业部,环境保护部.2015
[6]王丽伟,王川,王伟.机械化秸秆还田技术推广现状与对策—以安徽省为例[J].安徽省农业科学, 2015,43(34):317-319.
[7]李国平,石涵予.国外生态系统服务付费的目标要素与作用机理研究[J].新疆师范大学学报,2015,36(2):87-97.
[8]冯俏彬,雷雨恒.生态服务交易视角下的我国生态补偿制度建设[J].财政研究,2014(7):11-14.
[9]邹德堂,解保胜.寒地水稻机械化秸秆直接还田技术的研究[J].农机化研究, 2008(7):227-229.
[10]杜辉,李汝莘,樊桂菊等.机械化秸秆还田技术推广存在的问题[J].农机化研究, 2002(3):31-32.
[11]韩永俊,尹大庆,赵艳忠.秸秆还田的研究现状[J].农机化研究, 2003(2):39-40.
[12]杜长征.我国秸秆还田机械化的发展现状与思考[J].农机化研究, 2009, 31(7):234-236.
[13]韩青.农户灌溉技术选择的激励机制——一种博弈视角的分析[J].农业技术经济, 2005(6):22-25.
[14]杨明洪.退耕还林还草工程实施中经济利益补偿的博弈分析[J].云南社会科学, 2004(6):64-68.
[15] Sanders D W, Huszar P C, Sombatpanit. S, et al. Incentives in soil conservation: from theory to practice.[J]. Journal of Dermatology, 1999, 40(2):130–131.
[16] Hellin J, Schrader K. The case against direct incentives and the search for alternative approaches to better landmanagement in Central America[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems Environment, 2003, 99(03):61–81.
[17]王海龙,杨建飞.我国农业财政补贴机制探析[J].农村经济与科技, 2016(10):106-107.
[18]胡凌啸,周应恒.农业综合开发、农技推广培训与农机购置补贴效率[J].经济与管理研究, 2016,37(8):87-95.
[19]陈雨生,朱玉东,张琳.农户环保型农资选择行为研究——基于实验经济学[J].农业经济问题,2016(8):33-40.
[20]周颖, 王丽英, 甘寿文,等. 农户采纳蔬菜清洁生产技术补贴机制研究——以藁城区蔬菜堆肥化处理技术为例[J]. 河北农业科学, 2016, 20(3):82-86.
[21] M Ribaudo,C Greene,LR Hansen,D Hellerstein. Ecosystem services from agriculture: Steps for expanding markets[J].Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(11):2085-2092
[22]彭诗言.国际生态服务付费的经验借鉴[J].前沿,2011(12):196-200.
[23]聂倩.国外生态补偿实践的比较及政策启示[J].生态经济,2014,30(7):156-160.
[24]WunderS.Decentralized payments for environmental services: the cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador[J].Ecological Economics,2008,65(4):p.685-698.
[25]PagiolaS.Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practicesin Nicaragua[J].Ecological Economics,2007,64(2):p.374-385.
[26] Perrot-Ma?tre D. The Vittel Payments for Ecosystem Services: A “perfect” PES Case[J]. Sep 2006 - IIED, 2006.
PDF(1025 KB)

文章所在专题

农业工程

农业生态

24

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/