5种杀菌剂对番茄茎腐病的室内筛选和田间防治

任凤山,高亮,张博

农学学报. 2016, 6(5): 18-22

PDF(1271 KB)
PDF(1271 KB)
农学学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (5) : 18-22. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas15090002
植物保护

5种杀菌剂对番茄茎腐病的室内筛选和田间防治

  • 任凤山,高亮,张博
作者信息 +

Laboratory Screening and Field Control Effect of Five Kinds of Fungicides on Tomato Basal Stem Rot

Author information +
History +

摘要

笔者旨在通过筛选防治番茄茎腐病的有效药剂,为田间防治提供指导。室内测定了5 种杀菌剂对终极腐霉菌丝生长的抑制作用,恶霉灵、唑醚·代森联、硫酸铜钙、甲基硫菌灵和恶酮·霜脲氰为有效杀菌剂。研究结果表明:恶霉灵的EC50为0.364 mg/L,抑菌效果最好;唑醚·代森联效果次之,EC50为9.247 mg/L,其他药剂防治效果相对较差。在田间药剂筛选试验中,70%恶霉灵可湿性粉剂与70%甲基硫菌灵可湿性粉剂组合防治效果为95.57%,均优于其它供试药剂组合,可应用于番茄茎腐病的田间防治。

Abstract

The paper aims to screen out effective fungicides to control tomato basal stem rot and provide guidance for field control. Inhibiting effect of 5 fungicides on the growth of Pythium ultimum was investigated indoor. The test verified that the 5 fungicides, hymexazol, ovraclostrobin·metiram, copper calcium sulphate, thiophanate-methyl and famoxadone·cymoxanil, had control effect on the growth of Pythium ultimum. The results showed that hymexazol had the best antibacterial effect with the EC50 value of 0.364 mg/L, then was ovraclostrobin·metiram with the EC50 value of 9.247 mg/L, other fungicides had poor control efficiency. In field fungicide screening test, the combined control efficiency of 70% hymexazol WP and 70% thiophanate-methyl WP was 95.57%, which was better than other combinations and could be used in field control.

关键词

番茄;终极腐霉;茎腐病;杀菌剂;化学防治

Key words

Tomato; Pythium ultimum; Basal Stem Rot; Fungicide; Chemical Control

引用本文

导出引用
任凤山,高亮,张博. 5种杀菌剂对番茄茎腐病的室内筛选和田间防治. 农学学报. 2016, 6(5): 18-22 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas15090002
Laboratory Screening and Field Control Effect of Five Kinds of Fungicides on Tomato Basal Stem Rot. Journal of Agriculture. 2016, 6(5): 18-22 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas15090002

参考文献

[1] 徐作珽, 李林, 李长松, 等. 番茄茎腐病病原鉴定及防治研究[J]. 植物病理学报, 2004, 3(34): 286-288.
[2] 余永年. 中国真菌志(第六卷.霜霉目)[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1998.
[3] J.Van Der Plaats-Niterink. Monograph of the Genus Pythium[M]. Netherlands: Academy of Sciences and Letters,1981.
[4] 赵思峰, 方许阳, 姜海荣, 等. 新疆加工番茄腐霉根腐病病原鉴定及其rDNA的ITS区段分析. 植物保护学报, 2009, 36(3): 219-224
[5] 刘德生. 不同新型药剂防治大豆根腐病试验效果初报[J]. 大豆通报, 2005(2): 14-16
[6] 黄代峰. 日光温室秋冬茬番茄腐霉茎基腐病的发生与防治[N].上海蔬菜,2006(3):6.
[7] 张博, 李长松, 李林.大蒜腐霉根腐病药剂防治试验[J] .山东农业科学, 2008(8): 84-86, 89
[8] 王满意, 李宝聚, 张薇, 等. 甜椒根腐病防治药剂效果比较[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2006, 27(4): 19~22F.
[9] Abbasi PA, Lazarovits G. Seed treatment with phosphonate (AG3) suppresses Pythium damping-off of cucumber seedlings[J]. Plant Disease, 2006, 90(4): 459-464.
[10] 曹齐卫,孙小镭,王志峰,等.越冬茬日光温室黄瓜腐霉根腐病的发生与防治[J]. 山东农业科学, 2006(1): 60.
[11] 乔飞, 李林, 张博,等. 4种除草剂对花生腐霉根腐病菌的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2010, 6: 79-81
[12] 张博, 李长松. 蔬菜腐霉的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008, 24(3): 313-318
[13] 元菊丹, 冯凯, 齐军山, 等. 13种杀菌剂对生姜腐霉茎基腐病菌的毒力测定. 农药, 2011, 50(8): 617-619, 623
[14] 郭荣侠. 保护地番茄根腐病的发生与防治[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2008, 14(11): 181, 155
[15] 兰成忠, 陈庆河, 赵健, 等. 大豆疫霉菌部分生物学特性及其药剂筛选研究[J]. 植物保护, 2007, 33(4): 92-96
[16] 郭洪参, 李林, 齐军山, 等. 山东花生茎腐病发生规律及防治研究初报[J]. 山东农业科学, 2009(8): 83-85
[17] 杨晓贺, 张瑜, 顾鑫, 等. 大豆疫霉根腐病的综合防治[J]. 大豆科学, 2014, 33(4): 554-558
[18] SHARMA S L, DOHROO N P. Efficacy of Chemicals in Controlling of Rhizome Rot of Ginger Ginger and Turmeric[M]. Calicut: CRCRI, 1980: 120-122.
PDF(1271 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/