为了解横沙东滩围垦后潮间带大型底栖动物的现状,本研究分别于2019年10月（秋季）、2020年4月（春季）在横沙东滩自然潮滩和成陆区开展了大型底栖动物调查工作。结果表明,调查区域共发现大型底栖动物26种,自然潮滩物种数高于成陆区;自然潮滩和成陆区优势种明显不同,自然潮滩优势种为圆锯齿吻沙蚕、河蚬、缢蛏和谭氏泥蟹,成陆区优势种为日本新糠虾、日本旋卷蜾蠃蜚和摇蚊幼虫。大型底栖动物的平均丰度成陆区（481.60 ind./m2）高于自然潮滩（302.40 ind./m2）,平均生物量为自然潮滩（84.50 g/m2）高于成陆区（6.71 g/m2）。大型底栖动物的多样性指数（H′、J、d）为自然潮滩高于成陆区。Cluster和MDS分析表明,横沙东滩不同生境的底栖动物群落之间存在较明显差异,ABC曲线表明成陆区底栖动物群落受到了一定程度的扰动影响。
Abstract
In order to understand the current situation of large animals in the intertidal zone after reclamation in Hengsha East Shoal,the macrobenthic samples were taken in the natural tidal flat and the terrestrial zone of Hengsha East Shoal in October 2019 (autumn) and April 2020 (spring). A total of 26 species were indentified in survey area, and the number of macrobenthos species in the natural tidal flat was higher than the terrestrial zone. The dominant species in natural tidal flats and the terrestrial zone were obviously different. The average abundance of macrobenthos in the terrestrial zone (481.60 ind./m2) was higher than the natural tidal flat (302.40 ind./m2), and the average biomass of the natural tidal flat (84.50 g/m2) was higher than the terrestrial zone (6.71 g/m2). The diversity indices (H', J, d) of macrobenthos in the natural tidal flat were higher than the terrestrial zone. The results of Cluster and MDS showed that there were significant differences in the different habitats. The ABC curves indicated that the macrobenthic community of the terrestrial zone had been changed while the nature tidal flat were relatively undisturbed.
关键词
横沙东滩 /
大型底栖动物 /
多样性 /
群落结构
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
Hengsha East Shoal /
macrobenthos /
diversity /
community structure
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 郭永飞. 长江口水边线和潮沟遥感信息提取研究[D]. 上海:上海海洋大学,2011.
[2] 张云峰,张振克,刘玉卿,等. 长江口北支沉积动力变化及对人类活动的响应[J]. 人民长江,2019,50(9):24-29.
[3] 梁翠. 长江口陆源输入变化及河口生态环境响应的初步研究[D]. 青岛:中国科学院研究生院(海洋研究所),2013.
[4] 袁兴中,陆健健. 长江口潮滩湿地大型底栖动物群落的生态学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2002,11(5):414-420.
[5] 顾晓英,陶磊,尤仲杰,等. 象山港大型底栖动物群落特征[J]. 海洋与湖沼,2010,41(2):208-213.
[6] 张玉平. 九段沙底栖动物群落生态学研究[D]. 上海:华东师范大学,2005.
[7] 周晓,王天厚,葛振鸣,等. 长江口九段沙湿地不同生境中大型底栖动物群落结构特征分析[J]. 生物多样性,2006,14(2):165-171.
[8] 安传光,赵云龙,林凌,等. 长江口九段沙潮间带大型底栖动物季节分布特征的初步研究[J]. 水产学报,2007,31(增刊1):52-58.
[9] 安传光,赵云龙,林凌,等. 崇明岛潮间带夏季大型底栖动物多样性[J]. 生态学报,2008,28(2):577-586.
[10] 章飞军,童春富,谢志发,等. 长江口潮间带大型底栖动物群落演替[J]. 生态学报,2007,27(12):4944-4952.
[11] 吕巍巍,马长安,余骥,等. 围垦对长江口横沙东滩大型底栖动物群落的影响[J]. 海洋与湖沼,2012,43(2):340-347.
[12] 全国海岸带和海涂资源综合调查简明规程编写组. 全国海岸带和海涂资源综合调查简明规程[M]. 北京:海洋出版社,1986.
[13] CLARKE K R,WARWICK R M.Change in marine communities:an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation[M]. Plymouth:plymouth marine laboratory,1994.
[14] 田伟,徐兆礼. 椒江口海域大型底栖动物数量与多样性的分布特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2015,21(2):358-365.
[15] 董鹏,张海波,叶仙森,等. 象山港中部海域大型底栖动物群落组成及多样性特征[J]. 上海海洋大学学报,2015,24(3):430-440.
[16] 李宝泉,李新正,王洪法,等. 长江口附近海域大型底栖动物群落特征[J]. 动物学报,2007,53(1):76-82.
[17] DE ALMEIDA T C M,VIVAN J M. Macrobenthic associations in a South Atlantic Brazilian enclosed bay:the historical influence of shrimp trawling[J]. Marine pollution bulletin,2011,62(10):2190-2198.
[18] 袁兴中,陆健健. 围垦对长江口南岸底栖动物群落结构及多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报,2001,21(10):1642-1647.
[19] 胡知渊,李欢欢,鲍毅新,等. 灵昆岛围垦区内外滩涂大型底栖动物生物多样性[J]. 生态学报,2008,28(4):1498-1507.
[20] CONNELL J H.Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs:high diversity of trees and corals is maintained only in a non-equilibrium state[J].Science,1978,199:1302-1310.
[21] NEWELL R,SEIDERER L,HITCHCOCK D.The impact of dredging works in coastal waters:a review of the sensitivity to disturbance and subsequent recovery of biological resources on the sea bed[J]. Oceanography and marine biology,1998,36(1):127-178.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
基金
中国长江三峡集团有限公司科研项目（201903173）; “科技创新行动计划”社会发展科技攻关项目（21DZ1201700）
{{custom_fund}}
PDF(1222 KB)
