不同花生品种秸秆与籽仁营养成分综合分析

张忠信,王庆东,赵婧伊,董文召,韩锁义,高伟,刘华,徐静,杜培

植物遗传资源学报. 2020, 21(1): 215-223

PDF(1152 KB)
PDF(1152 KB)
植物遗传资源学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (1) : 215-223. DOI: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20191029004
论文

不同花生品种秸秆与籽仁营养成分综合分析

  • 张忠信1, 王庆东2, 赵婧伊2, 董文召1, 韩锁义1, 高伟1, 刘华1, 徐静1, 杜培1
作者信息 +

Nutritional Components Comprehensive Analysis of Stalk andKernels in Different Peanut Varieties

  • ZHANG Zhong-xin1,WANG Qing-dong2 ,ZHAO Jing-yi2,DONG Wen-zhao1,HAN Suo-yi1, GAO Wei1,LIU Hua1,XU Jing1,DU Pei1
Author information +
History +

摘要

花生是一种经济效益高的大田作物，为综合利用花生秸秆和籽仁的营养价值提高经济效益等，本研究以 26 个花生 品种为材料，通过分析秸秆中的粗蛋白、粗脂肪、粗纤维、粗灰分、钙、磷、中性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤纤维等指标，利用 SPSS 软 件通过主成分分析法进行营养价值评价；同时，用近红外分析仪测定了其籽仁的脂肪、蛋白质、油酸、亚油酸等营养指标，采 用 Topsis 法对其进行综合分析排序。结果表明：不同花生品种秸秆营养成分存在显著差异，商花 26 号、冀 545、冀 5059、远杂 9102、豫花 90 号综合营养价值较高；多数品种间籽仁的蛋白质含量和脂肪含量差异不显著，而油酸含量和亚油酸含量则存在 显著差异，其中豫花 102 号蛋白质含量最高，冀 5059 脂肪含量最高，冀农 G99 油酸含量最高、亚油酸含量最低；若兼顾秸秆和 籽仁的营养成分含量，综合价值由高及低的 10 个品种依次为冀农 G99、开农 310、商花 26 号、豫花 93 号、远杂 9102、冀 545、 濮花 56、濮花 52 号、豫花 89 号、郑农花 19 号，它们可作为仁秆两用型花生品种的首选。

Abstract

Peanut is a field crop with high economic benefits. In order to comprehensively utilize the nutritive value of peanut stalk and kernels to improve economic benefits，we carried out a study using 26 peanut varieties. We analyzed crude protein，crude fat，crude fiber，crude ash，calcium，phosphorus，neutral detergent fiber，and acid detergent fiber in the stalk. SPSS software was used to evaluate the nutritional value by principal component analysis. On the other hand，the nutritional indexes of fat，protein，oleic acid and linoleic acid were determined by near infrared analyzer while Topsis method was used to comprehensively analyze and rank the analysis results. The results showed that there were significant differences in the nutrient components of stalk among different peanut varieties. Shanghua 26，Ji 545，Ji 5059，Yuanza 9102 and Yuhua 90 have a higher comprehensive nutritional value. There were no significant differences in protein and fat contents among the most of peanut varieties，while there were significant differences in oleic acid and linoleic acid contents.Yuhua102 has the highest protein content，Ji5059 has the highest fat content，Jinong G99 has the highest oleic acid content and lowest linoleic acid content. If the nutrient content of stalk and kernels are taken into account，the comprehensive value of 10 varieties from the highest to the lowest is as the following order：Jinong G99， Kainong 310，Shanghua 26，Yuhua 93，Yuanza 9102，Ji545，Puhua 56，Puhua 52，Yuhua 89 and Zhengnonghua 19. These peanuts can be used as the first choice for the dual-purpose.

关键词

花生 / 秸秆 / 籽仁 / 营养

Key words

peanut；stalk；kernel；nutrition

引用本文

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

导出引用
张忠信,王庆东,赵婧伊,董文召,韩锁义,高伟,刘华,徐静,杜培. 不同花生品种秸秆与籽仁营养成分综合分析. 植物遗传资源学报. 2020, 21(1): 215-223 https://doi.org/10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20191029004
ZHANG Zhong-xin,WANG Qing-dong,ZHAO Jing-yi,DONG Wen-zhao,HAN Suo-yi,GAO Wei,LIU Hua,XU Jing and DU Pei. Nutritional Components Comprehensive Analysis of Stalk andKernels in Different Peanut Varieties. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources. 2020, 21(1): 215-223 https://doi.org/10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20191029004

参考文献

[1]禹山林.中国花生品种及其系谱.上海:上海科学技术出版社,2008.12Yu S L. Chinese peanut varieties and their pedigrees. Shanghai:Shanghai Scientific Technical Publishers,2008:12
[2]乔巧芝,万海燕.TOPSIS法在市场品牌竞争力研究中的应用.广东财经职业学院学报,2006,5(2):71-74Qiao Q Z,Wan H Y. he Application of TOPSIS in Competition Capacity of Market Brand.Journal of Guangdong College of Finance and Economics,2006,5(2):71-74
[3] 杨燕林,王朝文,杨洪涛,和加卫,王宇萍.不同蓝莓品种在云南省丽江市表现的综合评价.安徽农业科学,2015,43(15):37-40Yang Y L,Wang C W,Yang H T,He J W,Wang Y P. Comprehensive Evaluation onthe Performance of Different Blueberry Species in Lijiang City of Yunnan Province.Journalof Anhui Agri.Sci.2015,43(15):37-40
[4] 苏泽春,和秀云,和加卫.基于TOPSIS法和聚类分析法的树莓品种的综合评价.江西农业学报,2015,27(4):66-69Su Z C,He X Y,He J W. Comprehensive Evaluation of Raspberry Varieties Based onTOPSIS and Clustering Analysis Methods. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi,2015,27(4):66-69
[5] 苏泽春,陈翠,徐中志,谭敬菊,杨少华,李兆光.2种综合评价法在白芨种质资源综合评估中的应用.江西农业学报,2015,27(5):10-15Su Z C,Chen C,Xu Z Z,Tan J J,Yang S H, Li Z G. Application of Two Comprehensive Evaluation Methods in Comprehensive Evaluation of Bletilla Germplasm Resource. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2015,27(5):10-15
[6] 雷涌涛,于亚雄,杨金华,王志伟,乔祥梅,程耿,胡银星,黄锦,程加省.用TOPSIS综合评价云南大麦新品系推广价值.西南农业学报,2015,28(3):982-985Lei Y T,Yu Y X,Yang J H,Wang Z W,Qiao X M,Cheng G,Hu Y X,Huang J,Cheng J S. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yunnan Barley New Lines Promotional Value Based on TOPSIS.Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2015,28(3):982-985
[7] 孙志超,荆绍凌,刘文国.TOPSIS分析法在玉米杂交种综合评价中的应用.玉米科学,2006,14(5):49-51Sui Z C,Jing S L,Liu W G. The Comprehensive Evaluation of Hybrid Corn Based on TOPSIS. Journal of Maize Sciences,2006,14(5):49-51
[8] 林真,邓祖丽颖,王庆东,赵林萍,唐保宏.华北地区18个玉米品种秸秆饲用品质分析.草业科学,2017,34(7):1542-1549Lin Z, Deng Z L Y, Wang Q D, Zhao L P, Tang B H. Analysis of the feeding quality of 18maize cultivars in North China. Pratacultural Science,2017,34(7): 1542-1549
[9] 林海明,杜子芳.主成分分析综合评价应该注意的问题.统计研究,2013.30(8)25-31Lin H M,Du Z F. Some Problems in Comprehensive Evaluation in the PrincipalComponent Analysis. Statistical Research,2013.30(8)25-31
[10]王庆东,赵婧伊,赵林萍,张忠信,董文召,王瑞祥.14个花生品种秸秆的营养品质分析.中国饲料,2019(7):75-78Wang Q D,Zhao J Y,Zhao L P,Zhang Z X,Dong W Z,Wang R X. Analysis of thefeeding quality of peanut vine of 14 cultivars. China Feed, 2017,34(7):1542-1549
[11] 张峰,李魁英,王学清,王昆,马书林,张新同,吴占军,刘小虎.不同品种花生秧营养价值分析.河北农业科学,2010,14(7):72-73Zhang F,LI K Y,Wang X Q,Ma S L,Zhang X T,Wu Z J,Liu X H. Analysis on Nutritive Values of Peanut Vine of Different Varieties. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences,2010,14(7):72-73
[12] Vilas Patel,Amrutlal K. Patel,Nidhi R. Parmar,Anand B. Patel,Bhaskar Reddy,Chaitanya G. Joshi. Characterization of the rumen microbiome of Indian Kankrej cattle (Bos indicus) adapted to different forage diet. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2014,98(23):9749-9761
[13] Akhatou I, Fernández R A. Influence of cultivar and culture system on nutritional and organoleptic quality of strawberry. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2014,94(5):866-875
[14] 秦红艳. 软枣猕猴桃种质资源果实品质、表型性状多样性及主成分分析. 中国农学通报, 2015,31(1):160-165Qin Y H. Diversity of Fruit Quality and Phenotypic Traits of Actinidia arguta Planch Germplasm Resources and Their Principal Component Analysis. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015,31(1):160-165
[15] 杨玲,张彩霞,康国栋,田义,丛佩华. ‘华红’苹果果肉的流变特性及其主成分分析. 中国农业科学, 2015,48(12):2417-2427Yang L, Zhang C X,Kang G D,Tian Y, Cong P H. Rheologic Properties of ‘Huahong’ Apple Pulp and Their Principal Component Analysis. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015,48(12):2417-2427
[16] 王伟,吕旭健,张玉,王强,邵歆,王君虹,朱作艺,李雪,胡桂仙.基于聚类分析和主成分分析法的杨梅营养品质评价研究.食品工业科技,2017,38(1):278-280Wang W,Liu X J,Zhang Y,Wang Q,Shao X,Wang J H,Zhu Z Y,Li X,Hu G X. Evaluation of nutritional quality of red bayberry based on cluster analysis and principal component.Science and Technology of Food Industry,2017,38(1):278-280
[17] 王培云,邓丽,李阳,苗建利.从花生品质分析今后花生研究发展趋势.农业科技通讯,2015(11):25-26Wang P Y,Deng L,Li Y,Miao J L. Development Trend of Peanut Research in the Future Based on Quality Analysis of Peanut.Bulletin of Agricultural Science andTechnology,2015(11):25-26
[18] 郑向丽,叶花兰,王正荣,徐国忠,翁伯琦.仁秆两用型花生新品系农艺性状、产量与品质的比较分析.福建农业学报,2010,25(5):568-571Zheng X L,Ye H L,Wang Z R,Xu G Z,Weng B Q. Agronomic,yield and qualitycharacteristics of a new dual-purpose peanut variety. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2010,25(5):568-571
[19] 王才斌,刘云峰,吴正锋,郑亚萍,万书波,孙奎香,孙学武,冯昊.山东省不同生态区花生品质差异及稳定性研究.中国生态农业学报,2008,16(5):1138-1142Wang C B,Liu Y F,Wu Z F,Zheng Y P,Wan S B,Sun K X,Sun X W,Feng H. Diversity andstability of peanut kernel quality in different ecological regions of Shandong Province.Chinese Journal of Eco-agriculture,2008,16(5):1138-1142
[20] 郭峰,阮建,王莹莹,万书波,彭振英.利用变异系数分析花生品质性状应对环境变化的遗传稳定性研究.山东农业科学,2017,49(9):25-31Guo F,Ruan J,Wang Y Y,Wan S B,Peng Z Y. Study on Genetic Stability of PeanutQuality Characters in Response to Environmental Changes Using Coefficient ofVariation. Shandong Agricultural Sciences,2017,49(9):25-31
[21] 蔡阿敏,薛宵,赵佳浩,廉红霞,付彤,高腾云.春花生秧与夏花生秧的营养价值评价及瘤胃降解率比较.动物营养学报,2019,31(4):1823-1832Cai A M,Xue X,Zhao J H,Lian H X,Fu T,Gao T Y. Evaluation of Nutrient Value and Comparison of Rumen Degradation Rate between Spring-Grown Peanut Vine andSummer-Grown Peanut Vine. Chinese Journal Of Animal Nutrition,2019,31(4):1823-1832
PDF(1152 KB)

30

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail
段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉