Scientia Agricultura Sinica

Figure/Table detail

Genetic Diversity of the Prunus salicina L. from Different Sources and Their Related Species

WEI Xiao,ZHANG QiuPing,LIU Ning,ZHANG YuPing,XU Ming,LIU Shuo,ZHANG YuJun,MA XiaoXue,LIU WeiSheng

Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(3): 568-578. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.03.017

位点 Locus	连锁群LG	位置Sites	Ao	Ne	I	Ho	He	F	Nm
SSRPACITA5^[17]	G1	13.6	7	3.207	1.429	0.667	0.688	0.031	0.388
EPDCU5100^[18]	G1	14.5	6	3.734	1.406	0.729	0.732	0.004	0.363
PGS1.24^[19]	G1	58.4	19	9.125	2.473	0.667	0.890	0.251	0.374
BPPCT028^[19]	G1	60.7	10	6.055	1.990	0.688	0.835	0.177	0.387
pchgms1^[20]	G1	—	9	4.571	1.730	0.792	0.781	-0.013	0.461
PceGA025^[21]	G1	77.4	21	12.031	2.696	0.500	0.917	0.455	0.412
CPSCT039^[17]	G2	35.1	15	8.678	2.371	0.958	0.885	-0.083	0.449
CPDCT028^[22]	G2	48.6	21	9.521	2.583	0.813	0.895	0.092	0.376
CPDCT016^[23]	G3	28.4	21	11.157	2.656	0.833	0.910	0.085	0.299
CPDCT045^[18]	G3	46.4	14	7.211	2.231	0.833	0.861	0.033	0.519
CPSCT034^[22]	G4	1.8	13	4.347	1.854	0.708	0.770	0.080	0.455
CPPCT030^[23]	G4	16.8	16	7.189	2.273	0.688	0.861	0.201	0.326
CPSCT011^[22]	G5	5.2	19	9.253	2.559	0.667	0.892	0.253	0.529
PGS1.21^[19]	G5	26.7	8	3.050	1.330	0.500	0.672	0.256	0.212
CPSCT004^[23]	G5	30.7	5	3.504	1.399	0.833	0.715	-0.166	1.502
CPDCT027^[18]	G5	—	3	1.889	0.703	0.333	0.471	0.292	0.233
BPPCT025^[21]	G6	56.4	18	5.654	2.176	0.583	0.823	0.291	0.324
BPPCT029^[24]	G6	80.2	16	10.355	2.500	0.708	0.903	0.216	0.426
CPPCT006^[22]	G7	9.5	17	8.727	2.413	0.875	0.885	0.012	0.523
pchcms4^[21]	G7	29.6	7	2.503	1.170	0.500	0.600	0.167	0.313
CPSCT018^[22]	G8	0	19	8.471	2.414	0.750	0.882	0.150	0.382
CPDCT008^[24]	G8	—	14	3.266	1.695	0.458	0.694	0.339	0.158
整体Whole	—	—	298	143.5	2.002	0.686	0.798	0.142	0.428

Table 2 Diversity index of SSRs

Other figure/table from this article

Table 1 Information of materials in this study
Table 3 Diversity index of different populations in P. salicina
Table 4 Pairwise Nei’s Genetic Distance (above diagonal) and coefficient of genetic differentiation Fst (below diagonal) among different populations
Fig. 1 A dendrogram of 48 accessions obtained by UPGMA cluster analysis based on SSR markers
Fig. 2 Reasonable groups number of tested accessions inferred by mapping method
Fig. 3 The genetic structure of the plum accessions