RESERACH NOTES
XuDoudou, ZhaoLiang, ZhangNing, ZhangYongli, XieZhangshu, LiKan, YangDan, QinYeling, LiJiarui, ZhouChengxuan, ZhuFangge, LiuAiyu, HeYunxin, ZhouZhonghua
[Objective] This study aimed to explore the cotton yield formation mechanism under strip intercropping in the Yangtze River basin, and to screen the cotton intercropping patterns that are suitable for mechanized cotton production and highly efficient and sustainable. [Method] Four intercropping patterns of cotton-chili (CCI), cotton-bean (CBI), cotton-peanut (CPI), and cotton-sweet potato (CSI) and monocropping cotton (MC) were set up, and the photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter accumulation and distribution, yield and yield components of cotton under different intercropping patterns were analyzed, and the cotton partial land equivalent ratio (PLER) and economic benefits under various patterns were calculated. [Result] The seed cotton yield of CCI and CBI treatment were 6 055.19 kg·hm-2 and 6 495.81 kg·hm-2, which were 2.36% and 9.81% higher than that of MC, respectively. The main reason for the yield increase was that boll number per plant under these two modes increased by 1.61% and 11.21%, compared with MC, respectively. Compared with MC, the boll number per plant of cotton under CPI and CSI treatments decreased by 2.18% and 8.98%, and boll weight of cotton under CPI and CSI decreased by 2.59% and 5.60%. At full boll setting period, the leaf area index of cotton in various intercropping modes showed the following order: CBI > CCI > CPI > MC > CSI, and the leaf area index of cotton in CCI and CBI treatment increased by 5.88% and 9.80% compared with MC, respectively. At flourishing flowering period, compared with MC, the SPAD value and net photosynthetic rate of cotton leaves of CCI, CBI and CPI treatments increased by 8.51%, 7.65%, 6.37% and 11.55%, 8.31%, 4.02%, respectively. The CCI, CBI, and CPI treatments had a positive effect on the photosynthesis of cotton leaves and further increased the total dry matter accumulation of cotton at the boll opening period by 9.71%, 7.58% and 6.14% compared with MC, respectively. Under the treatments of CCI, CBI, CPI, and CSI, the economic benefits increased by 0.62, 1.53, 0.38, and 2.33 times compared with that of MC. Cotton is in the dominant position in CCI, CBI and CPI treatments based on the proportion of cotton area and the PLER. [Conclusion] From the perspective of economic benefits of cotton fields, the economic benefits of the four intercropping modes are higher than that of monocropping cotton, among which the cotton-sweet potato intercropping mode has the highest economic benefit, which has certain feasibility in production. The cotton-bean intercropping mode has the highest seed cotton yield, followed by the cotton-chili intercropping mode.